Clean energy – not natural gas – drove decarbonization in 2017

Despite attempts by the Trump administration and the coal industry to limit clean energy in favor of fossil fuels – including a tariff on solar energy, a thinly-disguised bailout for coal and nuclear power plants (that was rightly rejected), and a dramatic proposed cut to energy research – we are accelerating the transition to a cleaner electric grid. In fact, last year was the first time the reduction in power sector emissions can be attributed more to energy conservation and renewable energy than switching from coal to natural gas.

The new 2018 Business Council for Sustainable Energy (BCSE) Factbook* highlights the electric power sector as the driving force behind the decarbonization of the U.S. economy. In total, power sector emissions declined 4.2 percent in 2017, mostly due to the 18.4 GW of new renewable energy we added to the grid (a 14 percent increase over the previous year’s total U.S. renewable capacity). In 2017, renewable generation represented about 18 percent of total U.S. generation (around10 percent from non-hydro renewables alone).

This explosive growth further cements renewable energy’s role in reducing emissions from the U.S. power sector. Let’s dig into the factors that led to this growth, and how we can extend this trend of emissions reductions from renewables beyond 2017.

[Tweet “Clean energy – not natural gas – drove decarbonization in 2017”]

Growing investment, historically low costs

Investment in clean energy worldwide grew to $333 billion in 2017. Despite a 20 percent decline in solar investment – due in part to the uncertainty created by the Trump administration’s policy environment – U.S. clean energy investment held steady at about $57 billion, thanks to a 25 percent increase in energy smart technologies investments (e.g. digital energy, energy storage, and electrified transportation).

Renewable energy is also being procured at historically low costs. In 2017, the most competitive power purchase agreements (PPAs) for solar and wind projects were just over $20/MWh and $17/MWh, respectively. Capital expenditures – cost to construct projects from beginning to end – for solar and wind also declined from $1.14 million/MW and $1.12 million/MW, respectively, in 2016 to $1.1 million/MW and $0.99 million/MW in 2017.

Companies have responded to these deep cost cuts by betting on renewables.

Companies have responded to deep cost cuts by betting on renewables.

In 2017, U.S. corporations signed 2.9 GW of renewable energy PPAs – the second highest year on record, according to the BCSE 2018 Factbook. More and more companies are actively seeking out clean energy to power their operations, both for their bottom-line and because it’s the right thing to do for the world. The most recent State of Green Business Report highlighted that 71 Fortune 100 companies have a public target for renewable energy, and of these companies, 21 have committed to using 100 percent renewable energy. Further, 125 companies around the world have pledged to meet a 100 percent renewable target through the coalition, RE100.

How do we build on this trend of reducing power sector emissions?

This is encouraging progress, but we still have a long way to go to ensure a resilient, sustainable future. Here are some steps policymakers can take to further reduce emissions, including, but not limited to:

  • Investing in a modernized grid Designing a smarter, more flexible grid that keeps energy costs affordable and allows for more integration of renewable energy is vital to maintaining economic growth and a sustainable future.
  • Optimizing distributed energy resources – Distributed energy resources like demand response, rooftop and community solar, energy efficiency, smart appliances, and energy storage – especially when rewarded properly – can give customers more control over their energy bills and help align electricity demand with renewable energy resources.
  • Driving the growth of electric vehicles – With declines in power sector emissions, the transportation sector is now the largest source of carbon emissions in the U.S. Currently, electric vehicles are an expanding market, and if charged with renewable energy and managed well, they have the potential to reduce greenhouse gases and other harmful air pollutants, support further investment in renewable energy, provide grid services, and save people money.
  • Expanding customer options for dynamic pricing – Dynamic or real-time pricing charges different prices for electricity throughout the day based on the actual wholesale electricity costs. When designed well, these real-time electricity rates can help to integrate more renewable energy, limit the use of fossil fuel power plants, and importantly, save people money on their electricity bills.
  • Ensuring equity and access to clean energy – It is critical to ensure the benefits and opportunities of clean energy are made available to all communities. If equity isn’t ensured and the necessary widespread participation in clean energy isn’t achieved, we will fall well short of our climate and energy goals.

By working on these and other initiatives, clean energy can drive further decarbonization of the power sector and create a more sustainable world. We have a strong foundation – let’s build on it.

*This blog post is based on the Executive Summary of the 2018 Business Council for Sustainable Energy Factbook; EDF has not reviewed the methodology contained in the full report.

Editor’s Note: To learn more about just how much renewables contributed to emissions reductions in the United States, check out this new study by EDF economists, published in the journal Energy Policy.

This entry was posted in Clean Energy, Climate, Demand Response, Electric Vehicles, Electricity Pricing, Energy Equity, Grid Modernization, Natural Gas, Solar Energy. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

3 Comments

  1. bill nowak
    Posted February 18, 2018 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Great article and great news…

    Please investigate the role of geothermal heat pumps.

    In NY State the heating sector is almost as large a source of GHGs as transportation and, like EV’s, heat pumps are the way forward for the heating sector
    Check out renewableheatnow.org/

    • Andy Bilich
      Posted February 22, 2018 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

      Thank you for your comment and interest! While the focus of this particular blog was on electric power sector emissions, it is of course important to be addressing the impact and capitalizing on decarbonization opportunities in other sectors.

      EDF sees a lot of opportunity to work directly with cities and companies on issues like heating and building energy efficiency since it is a day to day issue for their employees, citizens, and budgets. To that end, EDF engages and has engaged in initiatives like the NYC Clean Heat program, the PlaNYC and the Better Buildings Summit and is working to drive innovation and create opportunities for clean energy solutions to shine in cities like Chicago and New York. Promoting and demonstrating the effectiveness of low-carbon heating solutions, including but not limited to geothermal, in driving economic and environmental benefits will be critical to reaching our climate goals. Thank you again for your interest!

  2. Ken Egnaczak
    Posted February 18, 2018 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    ” Optimizing distributed energy resources” . How about re-powering the unpowered dams ? In Massachusetts only 2% of the state’s existing (Small and Micro hydro) dams and locks are powered, nationwide 3%.

    ” Ensuring equity and access to clean energy” . How about telling the US Congress to change the Federal Power Act so FERC will stop forcing Federal permitting on all scales of hydro for tying to the grid while the other renewables have no FERC permitting and are rewarded for grid tying with the 30% income tax credit.

    We need all our renewables

    BTW this article should not surprise anyone, natural gas was always considered a “bridge” fuel to replace coal until the renewables are built out.