Results were released today for California’s fourth cap-and-trade auction of the year, which was administered last week by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Auction prices in the joint California-Quebec market (known as the Western Climate Initiative, or WCI) have trended downward this year, reflecting growing uncertainty among market participants about how best to plan their compliance strategies in the absence of regulatory or legislative clarity. A clear commitment to ambitious reductions in climate pollution and long-term market stability are urgently needed.
Climate 411
California auction results underscore need for ambition and certainty in cap-and-trade market
Effective participation and engagement of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities at COP29
This post was authored by Bärbel Henneberger, Senior Partnerships Manager at the Environmental Defense Fund.
On November 21, COP29 celebrated Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IP and LCs) as a thematic day in the Action Agenda of the Azerbaijani COP presidency. The day underscored the essential role of IP and LCs in safeguarding 80% of the world’s biodiversity and preserving 36% of intact forest landscapes.
To succeed in the fight against climate change, we must collaborate with IPs and LCs and respect their principles, culture, and methods while providing the support they need to further our shared conservation goals. We won’t succeed in conserving tropical forests without the partnership and leadership of IPs and LCs.
Climate conferences like COP29 offer a platform for IP and LCs to amplify their voices, and shape negotiations. It’s an opportunity for them to show the world how their efforts to conserve and sustainably manage their territories, which are some of Earth’s most important ecosystems, are critically important in the climate fight.
At COP29, IP and LC delegates spotlighted examples of effective participation in negotiations, policy frameworks, and innovative climate finance mechanisms. These efforts, though diverse, share a common goal: to embed Indigenous rights and knowledge systems into global climate action. Below are a few examples of Indigenous approaches to conservation efforts showcased during COP29. Critically, the world must continue to support, and learn from, these approaches well after the negotiations in Baku have ended.
Spotlight on LCIPP and the IP Caucus
What to watch in week 2 of COP29, from the finance conversation to critical sectoral action
This blog was authored by Christopher Dekki, Manager, Global Engagement and Partnerships.
Hopefully, COP29 delegates savored every moment of the rest day here in Baku because week 2 is already off to a hectic start. As deep divides within the negotiations remain unbridged, Azerbaijan, the newly minted COP29 Presidency, will need to increase its efforts to ensure consensus within the process and deliver a meaningful outcome.
Little progress made on the climate finance goal
The core outcome of this COP, a New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on Climate Finance for developing countries, stands on shaky ground as massive disagreements between the Global North and South are making it difficult for negotiations on the substance of the goal to take place in earnest. Nevertheless, the result of this process will have major implications for the ability of developing countries to transform their economies and societies and realize more ambitious climate action. With finance needs estimated to be $2.4 trillion per year by 2030 in developing countries alone, the COP negotiators must urgently step up action in this arena.
While a great deal of attention has been placed on the quantity of money that should be provided, EDF has entered the finance fray by advocating for greater attention to quality – going beyond the raw numbers and ensuring systems are put in place to make the most of every dollar spent on climate action. It is critical for delegates to work together during week 2 to break the deadlock, and deliver a climate finance goal that is concessional, accessible, and impactful. The good news is that the latest text includes many provisions taking us in this direction, laying out options that can lay the foundation for better finance, and thus better outcomes for the climate. We need negotiators to come together around the best solutions.
- For more on this topic, read EDF’s latest report on climate finance quality: “Quality Matters: Strengthening Climate Finance to Drive Climate Action”.
Making moves on carbon credits Read More
Solving the Adaptation Finance Gap: Plans are in Place, but Funding Falls Short
The UN climate talks, COP29, is well underway, and countries have entered final negotiations on the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), a new climate finance goal to boost funding for climate action in developing countries. Reaching agreement on the goal may be difficult in the face of the U.S election results, but it remains an urgent priority.
One glaring finance gap that we need to address in the new goal is finance for climate adaptation. Adaptation is how governments and communities prepare for and adjust to the impacts of climate change. It’s about making changes to reduce or prevent the harm caused by climate impacts like rising sea levels, more frequent storms, and hotter temperatures.
According to a new report from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), adaptation needs are not being met worldwide. Developing countries will need $215 billion per year over the next decade for their adaptation priorities, from building climate resilient infrastructure to restoring ecosystems. Yet international finance flows for adaptation were just $28 billion in 2022 – an increase over prior years, but nowhere near enough.
Transformational adaptation requires closing the finance gap and maximizing the impact of every dollar.
Where is the world falling behind on adaptation?
Many developing countries are particularly vulnerable to climate change impacts, and the good news is that they are prioritizing efforts to build resilience. UNEP’s Adaptation Gap Report found that 87% of countries have at least one national adaptation planning instrument in place, compared to around just 50% a decade ago. These instruments include National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and other strategies or policies that guide adaptation.
Now time for the bad news: although planning has improved, there is a growing gap in implementation as countries lack the necessary finance to meet their objectives. Adaptation has consistently been underfunded compared to mitigation, and while developed countries are working to double adaptation finance, the current $28 billion in annual flows represents just 13% of the $215 billion needed annually.
[Source: UNEP Adaptation Gap Report 2024]
The lack of finance for adaptation has serious implications for many developing countries, especially small island states which urgently need international support to strengthen resilience. For example, the Caribbean nation of Dominica is installing early warning systems to improve preparedness and reduce the impact of future hurricanes, but by 2023 they had only installed three systems and need 50 more to adequately cover the island. Without sufficient adaptation finance, the country will remain highly exposed to sudden climate shocks.
This finance gap is further complicated by limited private sector engagement in adaptation. UNEP finds that many transformational adaptation projects are seen as risky by private investors, due to their longer time frame for benefits and less clear return on investment. Private finance does flow to projects in infrastructure and commercial agriculture, but often not without efforts by the public sector to de-risk investments.
It is not surprising that two-thirds of adaptation financing needs are anticipated to be financed by the public sector. But the quality of public finance for adaptation has room for improvement as well. 62% of public finance for adaptation is delivered through loans, of which 25% are non-concessional, or at market rate with no favorable terms. And the use of non-concessional loans for adaptation in most vulnerable countries has actually increased in recent years. These tools have the potential to drive up the debt burden in developing nations which are already struggling to pay the bills. Expanding grant and concessional finance will be important to mitigate these challenges.
How do we unlock quality adaptation finance?
The Adaptation Gap Report suggests that filling the finance gap will require several enabling factors that can unlock new finance flows. Notably, in EDF’s new report ‘Quality Matters: Strengthening Climate Finance to Drive Climate Action,’ we identify similar strategies as we call for structural reforms within the international climate finance system. Three key recommendations overlap in both reports.
First, countries need to mainstream their climate objectives and adaptation goals within national planning and budgeting processes. This integration should be paired with robust stakeholder engagement that systematically includes subnational authorities, marginalized groups and potential implementing entities in the planning process. Doing so will better align adaptation activities with other national priorities and create more fundable projects. Moreover, planning processes should emphasize project evaluation and evidence gathering to better understand what interventions are most impactful and maximize the potential of climate resources.
Second, countries should adopt investment planning approaches to climate action. Specifically, they should work to develop a pipeline of bankable projects that can meet the objectives within their NAPs and other planning instruments. This can help attract investors to projects and ensure successful implementation of adaptation plans.
Third, multilateral financial institutions including multilateral development banks (MDBs) and climate funds need to undergo structural reform to improve the quality of finance. The MDBs are currently pursuing reforms to become better fit-for-purpose for addressing the climate crisis, and at COP29 they jointly announced that their collective climate finance will reach $120 billion by 2030 – though only $42 billion will be dedicated for adaptation. Improving the balance between mitigation and adaptation finance will be important to ensure that developing countries’ priorities don’t go unfunded. Additional actions these institutions can take include strengthening the concessionality of terms for adaptation projects to alleviate debt burdens and spark new blended finance opportunities, and leveraging innovative instruments like adaptation swaps which can foster positive adaptation outcomes in exchange for forgiving debt.
The NCQG is an important milestone which has the potential to advance action on these reforms and strengthen adaptation finance flows. Alongside supporting a strong quantitative goal, countries should call for improvements in the quality of finance, to ensure that finance for adaptation projects is available, accessible, concessional, and impactful.
Getting Climate Finance Right at COP29: Key Issues to Address in Baku
Negotiations at the United Nations climate talks in Azerbaijan, COP29, are now picking up. Global leaders are tasked with deciding on a new goal for how much money will be provided to developing countries to take climate action. The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance represents a critical opportunity to reshape how we support developing countries in their fight against climate change.
As negotiations continue and the negotiation text is revised, we need to see several core principles included in the NCQG to serve its purpose. EDF has reviewed some key issues for the NCQG to bring quality into climate finance, and these are some issues we must address in Baku:
- Unlock Economic Opportunities, Don’t Lock in Debt
First and foremost, the new finance goal must break away from traditional financing models that burden developing countries with additional debt, which further hampers their ability to take climate action. Market-rate loans and private finance at unfair market returns should not be counted as climate finance. As revealed in recent studies, many developing countries are already struggling with debt distress, making it crucial that climate finance comes primarily through quality climate finance.
The NCQG must transform climate finance into an engine for economic opportunity rather than a source of debt burden. This means structuring climate finance to unlock new markets, create jobs, and build resilient economies while avoiding the debt trap that has historically hindered development. The focus should be on enabling countries to seize the economic opportunities of the green transition through grants, concessional finance, and strategic investment in capacity building.
- Agree on What We’re Talking About: Define Climate Finance
Transparency is another cornerstone of the NCQG framework. We need clear, standardized definitions of what constitutes climate finance. Currently, the climate finance landscape is ambiguous, with some countries counting official development assistance (ODA) or non-climate-specific funding toward their climate commitments. The NCQG must establish precise criteria for what qualifies as climate finance, ensuring accountability and preventing the inflation of reported contributions.
- Cut the Red Tape
Access to finance remains a significant hurdle for many developing nations. The NCQG must mandate efficient, streamlined access channels that minimize bureaucratic barriers. Current systems often involve complex application processes and stringent requirements that can delay or prevent countries from accessing crucial funding. The new framework should prioritize swift, direct access while maintaining appropriate oversight.
- Remove the Roadblocks
A critical aspect often overlooked is the need to address “dis-enablers” – structural barriers that prevent effective climate finance deployment. High capital costs, excessive transaction fees, and unilateral measures like carbon border adjustments can significantly reduce the real value of climate finance reaching developing countries. For instance, some developing nations face interest rates two to three times higher than developed countries for renewable energy projects, making clean energy transitions unnecessarily expensive.
- Make Finance Predictable
The NCQG must ensure predictability in climate finance flows, so developing countries can plan long-term climate strategies with confidence that they will be supported. Currently, financing often arrives unpredictably or later than promised. By establishing clear timelines and reliable funding mechanisms, the NCQG can enable better planning and more effective implementation of climate projects.
- Public-Private Finance: Getting the Balance Right
Public finance must remain the cornerstone of the NCQG framework, while strategically leveraging private sector involvement. Currently, multilateral development banks mobilize only about $0.60 in private capital for every $1 of financing – far below what’s needed. While private investment is crucial for scaling up climate solutions, particularly in renewable energy and green technology, it cannot replace public finance. This is especially true for adaptation projects that protect vulnerable communities. Public funding through grants and concessional instruments can de-risk investments and catalyze private capital, while ensuring developing nations maintain sovereignty over their climate priorities.
Make COP29 outcomes matter if we want 2025 to succeed
Looking ahead, the success of the NCQG will depend on how well it addresses these fundamental issues. Simply setting a higher numerical target without addressing quality, access, and structural barriers would perpetuate existing challenges in climate finance. We need a comprehensive approach that combines ambitious funding goals with practical mechanisms for effective delivery.
As negotiations continue, world leaders should remain focused on solutions to make our climate finance system more equitable, efficient, and impactful. By ensuring unconditional access, emphasizing grants and concessional funding, maintaining transparency, and addressing structural barriers, we can build a framework that genuinely serves the needs of developing nations in their fight against climate change.
For more, read EDF’s latest report on climate finance quality: “Quality Matters: Strengthening Climate Finance to Drive Climate Action”.
Climate Finance and Accountability at COP29
Today, November 14, is Finance Day at COP29. We caught up with Leslie Labruto, EDF’s Managing Director for Sustainable Finance, about what she’s watching for at COP29, the United Nations’ climate change talks in Baku, Azerbaijan. Follow Leslie on LinkedIn.
Q: You’re in Baku for COP29. What key issues are on your radar?
A: The spotlight here this year is on scaling up climate finance for developing countries, and a need for redoubled global cooperation to achieve our shared climate goals. My team and I, along with the rest of the +Business team at EDF, are laser focused on working with the private sector to ensure climate and nature wins. A major focus at COP will be the establishment of a climate finance goal, called the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), which will replace the $100 billion annual commitment that high-income countries pledged to deliver under the Paris Agreement. The NCQG could reach at least $1 trillion a year—a figure that better aligns with the financial gap that needs to be closed to address the climate crisis.
Developing countries need these funds to tackle climate change, transition to clean energy, and adapt to the impacts of climate change, and it’s crucial that the finance be provided in a way that’s just, equitable, and effective. Let’s not forget that those ‘wins’ in developing countries are good for everyone everywhere, since climate impacts are felt globally. Successful climate finance means more forests still standing, a larger climate workforce, more resilient food systems, more methane abated, and greater global renewable energy capacity. Because climate-related investments are needed to meet global goals and address inequitable impacts from past emissions, low-income borrowers should have access to concessional finance. The NCQG will not only scale up ambition but also support countries as they prepare to submit their updated climate commitments in 2025.
Q: You’ve emphasized both the quantity and quality of climate finance. What do you mean by “quality”?
A: While the amount of climate finance is essential, its effectiveness — its quality — is equally important. When we talk about quality, we mean ensuring that climate finance is structured to be concessional, accessible, and impactful. In the private sector, finance is tracked with metrics like profits and losses that communicate shareholder value. In climate finance, however, there is less accountability in terms of impact metrics.
Climate finance should leverage public and private investment to make rapid progress toward net zero emissions and benefit local communities. To make sure financing achieves this, we need a system that is accountable for being easy to access, impactful in tackling climate-related challenges, and affordable for borrowers.