Concerned Citizens Plea for Stronger CAFE Standards
August 5, 2008 | Posted by John Balbus in Automobiles & Fuels, Health
This post is by John Balbus, M.D., M.P.H., Chief Health Scientist at Environmental Defense Fund.
Yesterday, a quiet public hearing on a hot August day in Washington D.C. drew a surprisingly large crowd. The official reason for the hearing, conducted by the National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration (NHTSA), was to take comment on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for revised Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards. A lawsuit forced NHTSA to draft an EIS that assessed global climate change impacts - including health - from improved fuel economy in the U.S. car and light truck fleet.
The 400-page document is technical, turgid, incomplete and misleading, and asserts that it is not possible to distinguish between the future health and climate impacts of a 41 mpg fuel economy versus the present 25 mpg. Needless to say, EDF does not agree with that conclusion or the methods used to come to it, but the comments at the hearing were far broader than just the EIS. Most striking was the lineup of citizens who called on NHTSA to take definitive action on climate change to help protect their future.

This post is by
This post is by Catherine Malina, an associate in the Health Sciences Program at Environmental Defense Fund and a survey interviewer for the "Are We Ready?" report.
This post is by Sheryl Canter, an online writer and editorial manager at Environmental Defense Fund.
This post is by 