Growing Returns

To feed a growing population, farmers need quality financing to flow

Farmers harvesting coffee in the countryside of Brazil.

Agriculture is both a driver of climate change and on the frontlines of climate impacts. A variety of farming practices, technologies and system changes can reduce emissions to help stabilize the climate and build resilience to help protect global food production. However, a lack of access to fit-for-purpose finance keeps farmers from transitioning to climate-smart farming practices.

This year at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, countries will gather to set a new global climate finance goal, known as the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), for how much money high-income countries will provide to low-income countries for climate action.

This negotiation presents an opportunity to elevate farmers’ needs in financing the climate transition in agriculture.

Agriculture needs significantly more climate financing

Increasing access to and availability of climate finance for farmers and agricultural value chains is vital for fostering resilience, food security and sustainable agriculture globally in the face of climate change. Yet, less than 5% of climate finance today — around $28.5 billion USD annually — goes to agrifood systems even though the sector contributes nearly one-third of global emissions and has a pressing need for adaptation.

UNEP finds that the world needs $350 billion per year by the end of this decade to close the funding gap for transforming food systems and meeting climate mitigation and adaptation targets. Agriculture is critically underfunded when it comes to climate finance, and an urgent increase in dedicated funding is essential to safeguard our food system.

Farmers also need higher quality climate financing

As the global community works to finalize a new climate finance goal, boosting the quality of climate finance is just as important as scaling the quantity of climate finance. We need to ensure money is accessible to the countries and communities that need it the most without creating more financial burdens on them.

EDF’s new report, Quality Matters: Strengthening Climate Finance to Drive Climate Action, further outlines why strengthening the quality of international climate finance is essential.

Agriculture has unique financing needs, and the transition to climate-smart agriculture at scale will require transformative investment from both the public and private sectors. For farming systems to shift, the market, finance and insurance systems that are the bedrock of farm businesses must also change. Yet, at present, these systems leave many farmers locked in the status quo and increasingly vulnerable to devastating financial losses. In addition, many other farmers do not have access to basic finance and market services.

High-quality climate finance, which considers the criteria below, can bridge these gaps.

  • Accessibility: Finance should directly reach farmers when they need it to help them invest in on-farm practice changes and technology for climate adaptation. Funding should be easy for farmers to access by reducing application burdens and delays and, ideally, distributing it through trusted local partnerships.
  • Impact: Finance should be targeted toward practices, technologies and system changes that reduce emissions or improve climate resilience. Systems for measuring, monitoring, reporting and verifying environmental impacts must be both accurate and practical for farmers and their partners.
  • Concessionality: Given the thin margins of most farming systems, finance providers should expect that below-market rate returns will often be required to achieve desired environmental and social impacts. Finance should address inequities in farmer access, while not increasing the burden of unsustainable debt at either the country or farmer level. Concessional finance should be leveraged to encourage more private sector finance to participate in solutions, helping to improve climate finance quantity and quality.

As the global community strives to set and meet ambitious climate finance targets, both quantity and quality must remain at the heart of discussions. Climate finance providers need to increase the total amount of financing available for investing in agriculture’s climate transition. At the same time, finance providers must assess how the structure of the financing they offer measures up against indicators of quality — accessibility, impact and concessionality.

The only way to ensure that both quantity and quality priorities are met is by listening to and learning from farmers, farmer organizations and their supporting partners.

By strengthening our collective focus on delivering sufficient high-quality climate finance, we can turn ambition into action — enabling farmers to build a low-carbon, resilient and abundant food system.

 

Posted in Uncategorized / Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

How can we support New York City’s housing cooperatives in adapting to climate change?

Co-authored by: Anushi Garg and Linda Shi

Anushi is the senior analyst for Environmental Defense Fund’s Climate Resilient Coasts & Watersheds program in New York-New Jersey. Linda is the associate professor for Department of City and Regional Planning at Cornell University.

New York City, like many cities, is simultaneously facing a housing affordability crisis and the impacts of climate change. As the city responds to these complex, interlinked challenges, it is critical to find solutions that ensure all New Yorkers have access to housing that is affordable and adapted to a changing climate.  

Unfortunately, cooperative housing, also known as co-ops, lacks access to many public sources of climate adaptation and disaster recovery funding, despite making up more than 12% of the city’s housing stock. Co-ops have a unique ownership model, one where residents have shares in a corporation that owns the building, as well as a proprietary lease tied to their unit, rather than a property title. This model helps preserve long-term affordability, but can also prevent co-ops from accessing resources geared towards housing that is owned by an individual.  

To support affordable multi-family co-ops, Environmental Defense Fund, Urban Homesteading Assistance Board (UHAB) and Cornell University released An Assessment of NYC Cooperative Housing’s Climate Vulnerability and Barriers to Adaptation. This report, based on a mapping assessment, a first-ever survey of co-ops and a policy review, looks at climate impacts on permanently affordable co-ops in New York City and encourages more responsive and equitable policies.   Read More »

Posted in Climate Resilience / Tagged , , , , | Comments are closed

New Report: How high-quality carbon offsets can lower livestock methane emissions

Authors: Erin Leonard and Maggie Monast

With more than 80 times the warming power of carbon dioxide over the first 20 years after its release, methane is one of the most potent greenhouse gasses. One major contributor to global methane is livestock operations — 32% of methane emissions from human activity come from livestock and animal agriculture.

The good news is that methane’s massive warming potential also creates an opportunity for a big and rapid impact if we can mitigate those emissions. To avoid the worst effects of climate change, we need to rapidly lower livestock methane emissions, a process that requires support and incentives to help farmers and ranchers adopt changes in their businesses.

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized / Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments are closed

How a producer-led movement to diversify food production can strengthen global food supply

As the world faces growing climate impacts and shocks, the need for a more sustainable and resilient food system has never been more urgent. Last year, the Kansas wheat harvest, known as a bellwether for global agriculture, hit a 60-year low due to severe drought. Record-breaking floods decimated European harvests in the same year.  

Climate-driven impacts, such as prolonged droughts, severe floods and unprecedented temperature shifts are already creating lasting repercussions for global agricultural and fishing communities. This instability affects local communities, jeopardizing livelihoods and food security. One strategy to enhance the resilience of aquatic and terrestrial food systems is food production diversification.  Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized / Tagged , | Comments are closed

Why food companies must act now to protect public funding for climate-smart agriculture

A low sun shining over a brown farm field.

The reauthorization of the farm bill, which offers critical funding to support farmers and food businesses, is currently being debated in Congress. This is a crucial moment to support farmers and businesses—and major food companies need to make sure they take advantage of it.

What is at stake? Billions of dollars in funding intended to help American farmers adopt innovative practices and protect their businesses from climate-related disasters. If done right, food companies will see increased farmer engagement in climate-smart agriculture, supporting farmers in remaining competitive and in participating in new markets as consumer trends shift to more sustainably produced products.

Food companies can use their voice in Washington to safeguard this essential funding for mitigating agricultural emissions and protecting food supply chains. Contact us to learn more. Read More »

Posted in Policy, Supply Chain / Tagged , , | Comments are closed

Three ways to make home buyouts more efficient

By: Gabrielle Rosario, EDF Intern

Each year, flood risk increases from sea level rise and storms, raising major concerns among millions of homeowners. Flooding can inundate homes, damage property and cause safety and health concerns, as well as isolate residents from essential government services like trash pickup or emergency vehicle access. In fact, by 2030, over 20 million Americans will be at risk of inundation due to sea level rise, and many will be unable to afford to move.  

Managed retreat policies, such as voluntary home buyouts, can facilitate the relocation of residents out of increasingly flood-prone communities. But unfortunately, existing federal programs are slow and require local governments to meet complex and challenging guidelines. 

Innovative approaches are needed to make buyouts more efficient. Here are three strategies that can help: 

Read More »

Posted in Climate Resilience / Tagged , , , , | Comments are closed

New research could help resource managers improve the health and resilience of the Mississippi River Basin

Spanning across 31 states, from Minnesota down to the Gulf Coast of Louisiana, the Mississippi River Basin is one of the most significant waterways in the world. Not only is it important for commercial purposes, but it also provides critical wildlife habitat, fresh water and recreational opportunities for communities.  

Given the river’s complex alterations and increasing climate impacts, it is more important than ever to take actions that will protect and nurture this treasured basin. Earlier this year, Environmental Defense Fund and co-authors* released new research that may prove beneficial to resource managers, aimed at evaluating and implementing actions to improve the Mississippi River Basin’s overall health and resilience. Based on this research, we are sharing a comprehensive framework that can be used to effectively manage the Mississippi River Basin as part of a whole basin governance structure that includes monitoring, modeling and adaptive management.  Read More »

Posted in Climate Resilience / Tagged , , , , | Comments are closed

Closing the enteric methane emissions innovation gap: A call for funding high-quality research

By Peri Rosenstein and Nicole Jenkins

Methane emissions are a potent greenhouse gas, warming the climate more than 80 times faster than carbon dioxide on a 20-year timescale. Rapidly and significantly reducing methane is the most effective way to reduce the rate of warming, especially over the next few decades. 

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized / Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments are closed

One year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court rolled back federal wetland protections. Here are the impacts so far.

One year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision that significantly reduced federal wetlands protections, leaving America’s wetlands at greater risk of development and degradation. The case of Sackett v. EPA was decided 9-0 in favor of the Sacketts, a couple from Idaho that filled in wetlands to build on their property near Priest Lake. The Court ruled unanimously that the wetlands on the Sackett’s property were not regulated under the Clean Water Act, but a narrow majority of justices went further to issue a controversial 5/4 opinion that scaled back federal protections that have provided for the thoughtful conservation of America’s wetlands for decades.  Of note, Justice Kavanaugh, siding with the minority, expressed concern about the decision’s “significant repercussions for water quality and flood control throughout the United States.”   

The impacts of the decision are still unfolding, and there remains a lot of uncertainty on how the unclear language of the Court will be interpreted in the long term. But what we do know is that this decision will have a significant impact. Here’s where things stand one year later. 

Read More »

Posted in Climate Resilience / Tagged , , , , | Comments are closed

Good manure management must involve ammonia emissions, too

When it comes to livestock and environmental impacts, methane emission reductions are often top of mind — and for good reason. Lowering methane emissions from animal agriculture is one of the fastest ways to slow down climate change. However, important local air pollutants like ammonia are seldom discussed with the same frequency or urgency.

Agriculture needs a path forward that jointly addresses its global climate impacts and its local environmental and public health impacts in an equitable way. Methane and ammonia must be managed in tandem. Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized / Tagged , , | Comments are closed