Transforming the Electric System to Reduce Costs and Pollution

electrical-power-linesBy: Beia Spiller and Kristina Mohlin

Electricity markets around the world are transforming from a model where electricity flows one way (from electricity-generating power plants to the customer) to one where customers actively participate as providers of electric services. But to speed this transformation and maximize its environmental and cost benefits, we need to understand how customer actions affect the three distinct parts of our electric system: generation, transmission, and distribution.


Generators – or power plants – convert an energy source such as natural gas, coal, wind, or sunshine into electricity that flows across wires and into your building, allowing you to turn on lights and use appliances. Although the electricity is no different whether it is generated by solar or coal, the environmental and economic costs associated with different energy sources vary significantly.

Not all generators are created equal in terms of efficiency, pollution, and how much they cost to build and run. Some generators produce electricity very cheaply and with fewer carbon emissions, but are expensive to build and maintain. Other generators are more polluting than clean energy alternatives and cost more per unit (or kilowatt-hour) of electricity generated, but can be turned on when demand for electricity skyrockets (for example, during heat waves). As demand increases, a variety of generators are used to provide the needed electricity – relying first on the cheapest generators (such as wind and solar) in order to keep costs low, and only turning on expensive and inefficient “peaker” generators (such as natural gas-fired power plants) during periods of high demand.

Because higher demand for electricity from power plants drives up cost and pollution, reducing demand for power plant-generated electricity can reduce both the overall cost of the system and harmful environmental impacts.

[Tweet “Transforming the electric system to reduce costs and pollution”]


Electricity is transported from power plants to local communities via transmission lines. In addition to exporting energy from traditional power plants, transmission lines also allow communities to “import” clean and cheap energy from distant areas. But long transmission lines are expensive, and as more electricity flows through them, power is lost through heat, requiring greater amounts of electricity to be produced. Thus, different areas in the same state can face different prices for electricity depending on that area’s overall demand and distance from the generation sources.

Again, reducing demand and increasing local sources of generation helps control these transmission costs. The less electricity needed from large, distant power plants, the less electricity needs to be moved.


Finally, local utility companies distribute electricity via the traditional electric wires we’re used to seeing on city streets. Some utility costs, such as billing and metering, are not affected by customers’ usage of electricity. However, very expensive grid infrastructure – including substations, transformers, wires and poles – is significantly affected by how much electricity customers demand.  Local utilities must also conduct costly maintenance and operations on this infrastructure to avoid blackouts and meet safety requirements. Importantly, as local demand peaks, the system needs to expand accordingly, causing distribution costs to increase even further. For example, New York City’s local utility (Consolidated Edison) foresees a billion-dollar investment in a new substation to accommodate increased demand in the Brooklyn-Queens area.


Reducing demand for utility-provided electricity helps each part of the system

Consider how residential rooftop solar affects the entire system. Each home equipped with solar panels requires less electricity from its local utility. Thanks to this reduction in demand and its related costs, the utility can use funding it would have needed for new transformers or substations to invest in improving energy efficiency or incentivizing more customers to generate their own electricity. Consolidated Edison is currently pursuing this type of effort in the Brooklyn-Queens area by identifying multiple alternatives to try to avoid the billion dollar substation investment. Other utilities are also experimenting with home energy batteries, which can store excess solar energy during daylight hours for use at night, further reducing each customer’s daily electricity use and impact on the distribution system. And because solar reduces demand for utility-provided electricity, less electricity has to be generated at power plants and transmitted from distant regions, reducing generation, transmission, and environmental costs. Many initiatives across the country are attempting to capture the opportunities offered by these technologies to change the fundamental way we interact with the electric grid.

Reducing the amount of electricity that needs to be generated by traditional power plants, transmitted long distances, and distributed locally, reduces the overall cost and environmental impact of our energy system.

For example, the Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) initiative in New York and the Public Utilities Commission-mandated Distribution Resource Plans in California require utilities to consider alternatives to traditional infrastructure investments to deal with peak demand. These initiatives encourage customers to install rooftop solar or adopt energy efficiency, storage, and demand response to reduce their use of grid-supplied electricity at peak times.

And, in Texas, the Distributed Resource Energy and Ancillaries Market Task Force (DREAM TF) is working to guarantee that customers who generate electricity are able to actively participate in the Texas electricity market. This will ensure distributed energy resources are paid appropriately for the benefits they provide to the system.

These efforts in New York, California, and Texas are on the right track. Reducing the amount of electricity that needs to be generated by traditional power plants, transmitted long distances, and distributed locally, reduces the overall cost and environmental impact of our energy system. That’s not just clean, it’s smart.

This blog post is part one in a three-part series that takes a deep dive into economics of the electric system and the role pricing can play in accelerating the clean energy economy. Part two of the series explores The True Cost of Electricity: What We’re Not Paying for Through Our Utility Bills. Part three of the series examines How More Transparent Electricity Pricing Can Help Increase Clean Energy.

This entry was posted in California, Electricity Pricing, Grid Modernization, New York, Texas, Utility Business Models. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Stuart Anderson
    Posted April 8, 2016 at 6:20 pm | Permalink

    Um, your nice diagram is missing something…..high efficiency energy storage, so that renewable generation never goes to waste. Pumped storage hydropower can have turn-around efficiency as high as 85%. Excess renewable generation can be used to pump water up to a reservoir; when demand exceeds our renewable generating capacity, the water in the reservoir can be used to drive turbine generators. Pumped storage is THE renewable solution to renewable generators’ intermittency problem.

    It is not a coincidence that you’ve failed to note this possibility. All pumped storage hydro in the US falls under the jurisdiction of those fine folks at FERC. All those former and future gas company executives at FERC can approve a 400 mile interstate gas pipeline in about two years (if the pesky activists stay away) but it takes from 7 to 10 years to get even a small pumped hydropower project licensed……..just a coincidence?

    For more info go to
    and download the white paper in the middle of the page.

    • EDF Blogs
      Posted April 13, 2016 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

      Thank you, Stuart for your comment and interest in our blog post. Hydropower certainly has a role to play as a storage technology that can help address the intermittency issue of renewable energy. However, at EDF we think that is one of many solutions we should deploy to ensure we can integrate higher and higher levels of clean, renewable energy onto the electric grid. Some other solutions include demand response, time-of-use electricity pricing, smart charging of electric vehicles, and battery storage. You can find more information here:

  2. Daniel Albert
    Posted April 11, 2016 at 7:33 am | Permalink

    I agree with all of the points brought up by this article and fervently support clean alternatives to power generation. However, the generation and transmission capacity described is a simplistic view. Until a solar or wind solution can provide its own power through storage or other means when the sun is not shining and the wind is not blowing, the power companies are still required to provide for the max projected power use without those solutions in production. Let’s say that you have installed residential solar and converted to electric heat to maximize your savings. On that bitter cold winter night or during that snowstorm when you are not producing, you still expect your power company to heat your home. Even though you can and do produce clean power, the power company still must meet the peak need when you are not producing. We REQUIRE them to build ‘dirty’ plants or transmit power over great distances. We MUST invest in storage technologies allowing local power generation to REMAIN local.

    • EDF Blogs
      Posted April 13, 2016 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

      Thank you, Daniel for your support of clean energy and your comment. We agree that energy storage should play a big role in ensuring clean energy resources can meet energy demand. As we pointed to in the blog post, there are several initiatives encouraging customers to adopt storage and other clean energy solutions in places like California and New York to do just that. However, this is one of many solutions we should be deploying to solve this problem. Some others include demand response, time-of-use electricity pricing, and smart charging of electric vehicles. Thanks again for you interest and we hope you continue to read the rest of the series!

  3. Posted April 13, 2016 at 4:22 am | Permalink

    Reducing the demand for power plant generated electricity can help us save the nature at first following mankind and other natural resources. This post on how to minimize its power demand is more informative and can help us in future prospects to minimize power consumptions to avoid any hazards.
    SMPS Transformer Manufacturer in India | Inductor Coil Manufacturer in India

2 Trackbacks