Our impact
For more almost 60 years, we have been building innovative solutions to the biggest environmental challenges — from the soil to the sky.
About us
Guided by science and economics, and committed to climate justice, we work in the places, on the projects and with the people that can make the biggest difference.
Get involved
If we act now — together — there’s still time to build a future where people, the economy and the Earth can all thrive. Every one of us has a role to play. Choose yours.
News and stories
Stay informed and get inspired with our in-depth reporting about the people and ideas making a difference, insight from our experts and the latest environmental progress.
  • Blogging the science and policy of global warming

    Murkowski Resolution defeated

    Posted: in Climate Change Legislation, Policy

    Written By

    Rebecca Rasch
    Rebecca Rasch

    Share

    After hours of lengthy debate last Thursday, Senator Murkowski’s resolution of disapproval which declared that greenhouse gases do not pose a threat to public health and therefore should not be regulated by the EPA, was voted down on the Senate floor. This is good news but what does it mean for the chances of climate bill?

    E2 has a note from ClearView Energy Partners, a consulting firm, which explains that

    “No Republicans voted against the resolution. This does not mean, however, that that all 41 Republicans will vote against a climate bill that could deliver substantial economic benefits to their states. Although American Power Act architect Lindsey Graham (R-SC) remains opposed to the legislation he helped craft, we reiterate that, with (a) a pro-drilling, pro-safety compromise that provides political “containment” of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill; and (b) explicit support by coal state Democrats, Senator Graham and other green-leaning Republicans may find themselves with the opportunity to negotiate even greater provisions on behalf of their constituents in return for offering the decisive votes in support of passage (60 Senate votes would be required).”