Demand Response Helps Texas Avoid Rolling Blackouts in the Face of Polar Vortex

MaritaHeadshotAs we begin a new year, the outlook for 2014 looks bright.  But as the Polar Vortex has descended upon the U.S. over the last few days, we have been reminded of the past, specifically the winter of 2011 when Texas’ electricity grid stuttered under the extreme cold.

Monday, as a record-breaking cold snap whisked over the U.S., the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), the state’s grid operator, warned of possible blackouts, just as they did in 2011.  We were lucky this time, but in February of 2011 we were not, and blackouts occurred throughout the state.

ERCOT’s warning meant that the grid's power reserves “dropped below a comfortable threshold,” and the "system was just one step away from rolling blackouts” as the need for energy outpaced supply.  As these blackout threats loomed, two power plants succumbed to the cold and went down.  The loss in capacity amounted to about 3700 megawatts (MW), with 1800 MW lost due to the cold.  According to Dan Woodfin, ERCOT’s Director of System Operations, “if we had lost another unit it would have put us into an Energy Emergency Alert Three” – the stage that prompts rolling blackouts.  This is unnecessary and unacceptable.

Demand Response to the Rescue

This sudden strain on the system comes after a recent sigh of relief that our electric grid’s shortcomings are not as serious as previously thought.

Over the last few years, EDF has been carefully analyzing and discussing Texas’ resource adequacy imbalance – a topic we call the Texas Energy Crunch.  However, when ERCOT analyzed its previous forecasts for 2013, it indicated that the energy crunch in Texas wasn’t as bad as first thought, based on economic growth calculations.  This news came as the PUC began deliberating whether to reform the state’s current energy-only market structure to a capacity market or, as EDF is advocating, a ‘third way’ that prioritizes demand-side resources: demand response, energy efficiency, energy storage and renewables.

Demand response (DR) rewards customers who voluntarily use less electricity at times when power supplies are tight.  DR is a cost-effective technology that could play a pivotal role in ensuring resource adequacy.  Right now, ERCOT predominately relies on large industrial customers for participation in demand response, but EDF intends to see residential customers reap the benefits of this innovative technology as well. Furthermore, DR is an agile resource that can readily respond during extreme weather, unlike vulnerable traditional generation, such as coal and natural gas plants.

Source: KXXV

Source: KXXV

Monday morning ERCOT called upon available demand response across the state, which helped keep the lights on.  While operators of fossil fuel plants claim that they are the most reliable solution for providing electricity to Texans, it was demand response that helped the state avoid involuntary rolling blackouts.  No single resource is the right answer – they all have limitations – but as we saw this time, some fossil fueled generation couldn’t respond to the need when called upon.

Future Outlook

In Texas, we worry most about the Texas Energy Crunch during hot summer afternoons.  But as we’re experiencing now, winter weather can catch us off-guard too – all the more reason to invest in fast-acting, flexible, clean energy resources now to protect against inevitable shocks.  While we may be able to see our breath, we shouldn’t have to hold our breath in hopes that our grid will make it through these events!

As climate change plays out, weather patterns will become more disrupted and unpredictable.  The U.S. and Texas should prepare for more recording-breaking energy demand by investing in a resilient grid in order to withstand the next extreme weather event.

Of course, this requires Texas officials to stop denying climate change.  State regulators’ forecasting cannot consist of economic analyses alone; it must also include the realities of an uncertain future climate.  To date, climate change has been a missing, but crucial piece to the PUC decision on market structure reform, which aims to address these problems.  EDF’s position prioritizes demand response and other resources capable of meeting the challenges when needed: solar and coastal wind on a hot summer day and west Texas wind on a stormy night.  In the winter of 2011 it was wind power that helped save the day, and it looks like demand response is having its day in the sun this year.

This entry was posted in Demand Response, ERCOT, Extreme Weather, Renewable Energy, Texas Energy Crunch, Wind and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • Confluence of SJR, Old, and Middle rivers

    About This Blog

    Advocating for healthier air and cleaner energy in Texas through public education and policy influence.

  • Get blog posts by email

    Subscribe via RSS

  • From Twitter

  • Meet The Bloggers

    Ramon AlvarezRamon Alvarez
    Senior Scientist

    Elena Craft
    Health Scientist

    Jim Marston
    Vice President, US Climate and Energy Program, Director of the Texas regional office

    Marita Mirzatuny
    Project Manager

    Marcelo Norsworthy
    Transportation Research Analyst

    Kate Zerrenner
    Project Manager

  • Categories

  • Archives