Why Luminant Shouldn’t Get a Free Pass to Pollute

Yesterday, Luminant filed a motion in the DC circuit court to fight vital clean air rules that other utilities in Texas have been able to meet. Instead of working with EPA on a path toward cleaner air, Luminant abandoned recent talks with EPA and issued a press release that recused itself of responsibility, threatened possible plant closures and blamed EPA for potential job losses. Luminant's recent statement highlights a simple fact: closing plants is a business decision, plain and simple. Luminant isn’t closing these plants because of EPA regulations – that’s just their cover story.  They’re closing the plants because they did not begin to make reductions to meet the rule that anyone could see was coming.  The EPA just gives them a convenient way to shift blame. Moreover, Luminant is ignoring other viable alternatives to plant closures just to save some money in the short-term.  If anyone loses their job, they can blame Luminant’s management team for failing to plan accordingly to abide by the law.  We feel very bad for the workers whose company let them down.

Who is Luminant?

Luminant is a subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (EFH) and is the largest electricity producer in Texas.  In 2005, there were 32 other power plants in the nation that emitted more sulfur dioxide (SO2) than Luminant's Martin Lake coal plant.  By 2010 there were only three. The story is similarly sad for Luminant's two other 1970's vintage plants, Big Brown and Monticello.  Ranked 21st and 28th for their total SO2 emissions in 2005, they ranked 10th and 11th in 2010 as Luminant fell behind the industry in cleaning up. 

Why is the Cross State Air Pollution Rule important?

The Cross-State Air Pollution Rule requiring cleaner air in Texas was initially adopted by the Bush EPA in 2005 and revised in July 2011 in response to a judicial decision.  Like the rule adopted under the Bush EPA, the revised Rule requires Texas power plants to reduce life-threatening air pollution.  The Rule limits the amount of SO2 and nitrogen oxides (NOx) pollution power plants in 27 states – including Texas – are allowed to emit.  Collectively, Texas power plants are the nation's largest emitter of NOx and the second largest emitter of SO2.  Nationally, this rule will save up to 34,000 lives, prevent 400,000 asthma attacks, and avoid 1.8 million lost work or sick days each year once in place.  Texans will be among the biggest beneficiaries of this rule with up to 1,704 lives saved each year.  Likewise, Texas will be among the biggest losers in terms of health if this rule is delayed.

Do other plants comply with the law?

Most Texas utilities have business plans in place to ensure compliance with clean air standards.  In fact, Austin Energy, City Public Service (CPS) Energy in San Antonio and the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) began improvements to their facilities and have already reached the reductions required by the rule, and have excess allowances to sell to Luminant.  NRG Energy has also made reductions in anticipation of the rule, which means that it does not face the issues that Luminant has brought upon itself.

Luminant had a choice to plan for compliance or fight it.  For years, the company fought it and gambled with its shareholder’s money and its employees’ jobs. Rather than take responsibility for its gamble, the company is blaming the consequences on EPA.  As the person who negotiated the environmental commitments during the TXU-EFH buyout, it saddens me that EFH is tarnishing its brand and the long-term value of its stock by violating its touted “Core Operating Principle of Environmental Stewardship” to “outperform current clean air requirements through voluntary emissions reductions.”

For more info, see this link.

This entry was posted in Air Pollution, Environment, Environmental Protection Agency and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Thomas Brown
    Posted January 13, 2012 at 1:14 PM | Permalink

    Since Texas deregulation Texans have paid some of the highest electric rates in the nation. Just in the past year have they gotten more under control and affordable. Now, the liberal droids want to control the power plants in Texas regardless of WHO GETS HURT!

    Every move you morons make effects the end user. Yes, close down Texas's best power plants that you live no where around just to pass along your agenda by the closings of perfectly good plants!
    We the people of Texas are the ones that get hurt,,, those that get unemployed, those that have built business, and we the consumer.

  • Confluence of SJR, Old, and Middle rivers

    About This Blog

    Advocating for healthier air and cleaner energy in Texas through public education and policy influence.

  • Get blog posts by email

    Subscribe via RSS

  • From Twitter

  • Meet The Bloggers

    Ramon AlvarezRamon Alvarez
    Senior Scientist

    Elena Craft
    Health Scientist

    Jim Marston
    Vice President, US Climate and Energy Program, Director of the Texas regional office

    Marita Mirzatuny
    Project Manager

    Marcelo Norsworthy
    Transportation Research Analyst

    Kate Zerrenner
    Project Manager

  • Categories

  • Archives