Strong Federal Air Measures Still Needed

This blog post was written by Tomás Carbonell, Attorney in EDFs Climate and Air Program.  Jack Nelson, a legal intern in EDF’s Washington, D.C. office, assisted in the preparation of this post. 

Source: EPA

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency put in place last year important standards to protect public health and reduce emissions of harmful air pollutants from oil and gas storage tanks and related equipment.  EPA wisely issued those standards after thousands of comments were provided by concerned public advocates for cleaner air.  With oil and gas production expanding quickly, tough standards are needed now more than ever to assure air quality protections for people living near oil and gas producing areas.

Recently, EPA proposed changes to standards for storage tanks in the oil and gas sector — a major source of pollutants that contribute to smog, climate change, and other threats to public health and the environment.  These changes would undermine the progress made thus far and would lead to significant and unnecessary increases in emissions of volatile organic compounds, methane, and other pollutants.  EDF is urging EPA not to finalize the proposed revisions in comments filed together with Clean Air Council, Clean Air Task Force, Environmental Integrity Project, Natural Resources Defense Council and  Sierra Club.

Proposed Changes to the Storage Tank Standards

Last fall, oil and gas industry groups petitioned EPA for changes to the storage tank standards, arguing that less stringent standards are needed because these tanks are even more numerous and emit at higher levels than EPA predicted when it was developing the current standards.  If anything, this new information indicates the need to maintain or strengthen health-protective standards for storage tanks.  EPA’s proposed changes would instead:

  • Exempt approximately 20,000 already-built storage tanks from the standards, unless those storage tanks experience an emissions increase;
  • Allow newly built storage tanks an additional six months to comply with the standards; and
  • Allow many storage tanks to stop using cost-effective emission controls they have already installed, even if they still emit significant quantities of pollutants.

These changes would forego vital and cost-effective emission reductions that are needed to protect communities around the country from harmful levels of ozone and toxic air pollutants. EDF’s comments note that just one of the proposed revisions, the exemption for already-built tanks, could result in additional emissions of more than 3 million tons of VOCs (volatile organic compounds) and 700,000 tons of methane over the lifetime of these facilities.

EPA’s proposal is a step in the wrong direction at a time when families and communities affected by oil and gas pollution need stronger and more comprehensive protections.  Our comments point out serious shortcomings in the proposed rule and the analysis that accompanies it, and urge EPA not to finalize these changes to the storage tank standards.

 

This entry was posted in Methane, Natural Gas, Washington, DC. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • About the author

    From time to time, the Energy Exchange blog includes posts from infrequent contributors, such as other EDF scientists and staff. Since these authors vary, we use this standard author bio profile for guest posts. For more information about this author, please see his/her link at the beginning of the post.

  • About this Blog

    EDF Energy Exchange - Accelerating the clean energy revolution

    EDF's energy experts discuss how to accelerate the transition to a clean, low-carbon energy economy.

    Follow EDFEnergyEX

  • Categories

  • Get blog posts by email

    Subscribe via RSS