Another outpouring of support for California’s cap-and-trade regulation

With only two and a half months remaining until North America’s largest carbon market goes “live,” it’s no surprise that economic experts from around the nation are standing up and voicing support for California’s program.  Just last weekend, 56 economists from both in-state and out-of-state academic institutions, and some NGOs, sent a letter to Governor Brown commending him for his leadership and recommending the state move forward with the planned auction component of cap-and-trade.

The Air Resources Board’s currently adopted regulation distributes most allowances for free, but does auction some as well, thus taking into consideration the needs of both California consumers and California businesses.  In the first two years of the program, businesses will receive approximately 90% of allowances for free.  After that, the amount auctioned increases, though CARB has committed to continuing to study this option to protect businesses from foreign competition.

In the letter, economists from 34 different colleges and universities, along with several from NGOs and think tank organizations, reiterated an important point: regardless of whether emissions permits are sold or given away for free, regulated businesses are likely going to pass through costs and change the price of the products they sell.  And, while it might be appropriate to give some allowances away to protect businesses from foreign competition, polluters should not be able to profit from the program without making real reductions.  It’s also important, the economists noted, to preserve the state’s ability to put the revenue to beneficial use cutting climate change pollution.

The legislature, the governor’s office, and many stakeholders, including EDF, have been considering what beneficial uses of proceeds from the allowance auction might look like.  EDF’s report Invest to Grow covers this subject in detail.

State law already requires that the money from the auction be spent in ways that further the purpose of AB 32 – cutting climate change pollution – and there are many opportunities within that constraint.  Further, the budget passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor in July calls for a large portion of proceeds to relieve pressure on the state’s much strained budget.  Several other bills are also being considered in this final week of the legislative session that aim to address priorities and guidelines for auction revenue investments.

EDF will continue to explore the win-win opportunities that auction proceeds creates in more depth with a series of upcoming blog posts.

This entry was posted in Cap and trade, Climate, Global Warming Solutions Act: AB 32. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Posted August 29, 2012 at 6:48 am | Permalink

    Tim, thank you for emphasizing the positive. We have to move forward, QUICKLY. I am a HUGE supporter of EDF (financially) for the work you are doing with CARB. This year I gave heavily to EDF and four other disparate organizations who I felt share my sense of urgency to implement effective measures to begin reducing CO2 emissions as quickly as possible. Reductions beginning this year (2012) would signify the end of the world as we know it and a new beginning. I am perplexed that you make no mention of the issue of offsets. If there is a discussion on EDF's position on offsets elsewhere, please point me in the right direction. If not, would you please comment on the use of offsets the case: Citizens Climate Lobby and Our Children’s Earth Foundation v. California Air Resources Board, which was filed on March 27, challenging the proposed use of carbon offset credits to meet emissions reduction requirements? View the PDF at http://bit.ly/CCL-OCEvsOffsets