A big day for chemicals

Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Senior Scientist.

Today is a big day in building momentum towards achieving fundamental reform of our nation’s policies intended to ensure the safety of the chemicals we use and to which we are exposed every day.

Here’s a sample of what's going on:

All three witnesses are expected to press for prompt and comprehensive reform of TSCA.

  • Thirteen states — California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont and Washington — are releasing their own set of principles for TSCA reform, which call for a sweeping overhaul of the law.  Ted Sturdevant, Director of the Washington State Department of Ecology, noted:  “We need a federal law that prevents contamination from happening in the first place, and phases out the harmful chemicals that are already in widespread use.  That’s common sense, but it’s not the system we have today.”
  • HealthyStuff.org has released its latest findings from its ongoing testing of consumer products for toxic chemicals, this batch focused on toys apropos of the upcoming holiday season.  This site is run by the Ecology Center of Ann Arbor Michigan and the Center for Environmental Health, both founding members of the Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families campaign.
  • A new study by the Environmental Working Group identified more than 200 toxic chemicals present in umbilical cord blood of ten African American, Asian and Hispanic newborns.  Among the chemicals found are the plastic component bisphenol A (BPA), the flame retardant tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) used in electronics, the synthetic fragrances galaxolide and tonalide used in many cosmetics and detergents, and perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA, or C4), a member of the family of chemicals used to make non-stick and grease-, stain- and water-resistant coatings for cookware, textiles, food packaging and other products.

Quite a day!

This entry was posted in Health Policy, TSCA Reform and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Stephenie
    Posted December 2, 2009 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Great summary – and one more story! Today is the anniversary of the Bhopal disaster when the Union Carbide/Dow chemical plant blew up, killing thousands. Today's chemical security bill in Congress is meant to prevent this from happening again. More here:
    http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/toxics/justice-for-bhopal

  • About this blog

    Science, health, and business experts at Environmental Defense Fund comment on chemical and nanotechnology issues of the day.

    Our work: Chemicals

  • Categories

  • Get blog posts by email

    Subscribe via RSS

  • Filter posts by tags

    • aggregate exposure (10)
    • Alternatives assessment (3)
    • American Chemistry Council (ACC) (55)
    • arsenic (3)
    • asthma (3)
    • Australia (1)
    • biomonitoring (9)
    • bipartisan (6)
    • bisphenol A (19)
    • BP Oil Disaster (18)
    • California (1)
    • Canada (7)
    • carbon nanotubes (24)
    • carcinogen (22)
    • Carcinogenic Mutagenic or Toxic for Reproduction (CMR) (12)
    • CDC (6)
    • Chemical Assessment and Management Program (ChAMP) (13)
    • chemical identity (30)
    • chemical testing (1)
    • Chemicals in Commerce Act (3)
    • Chicago Tribune (6)
    • children's safety (23)
    • China (10)
    • computational toxicology (11)
    • Confidential Business Information (CBI) (52)
    • conflict of interest (4)
    • consumer products (48)
    • Consumer Specialty Products Association (CSPA) (4)
    • contamination (4)
    • cumulative exposure (4)
    • data requirements (46)
    • dermal exposure (1)
    • diabetes (4)
    • DNA methylation (4)
    • DuPont (11)
    • endocrine disruption (28)
    • epigenetics (4)
    • exposure and hazard (49)
    • FDA (8)
    • flame retardants (20)
    • formaldehyde (15)
    • front group (13)
    • general interest (22)
    • Globally Harmonized System (GHS) (5)
    • Government Accountability Office (5)
    • hazard (6)
    • High Production Volume (HPV) (22)
    • in vitro (14)
    • in vivo (11)
    • industry tactics (41)
    • informed substitution (1)
    • inhalation (18)
    • IUR/CDR (27)
    • Japan (3)
    • lead (6)
    • markets (1)
    • mercury (4)
    • methylmercury (2)
    • microbiome (3)
    • nanosilver (6)
    • National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (20)
    • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (7)
    • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (5)
    • National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) (7)
    • National Toxicology Program (1)
    • obesity (6)
    • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (3)
    • Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) (4)
    • Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (16)
    • Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) (3)
    • oil dispersant (18)
    • PBDEs (16)
    • Persistent Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT) (22)
    • pesticides (7)
    • phthalates (17)
    • polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) (5)
    • prenatal (6)
    • prioritization (35)
    • report on carcinogens (1)
    • revised CSIA (3)
    • risk assessment (69)
    • Safe Chemicals Act (24)
    • Safer Chemicals Healthy Families (33)
    • Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) (20)
    • Small business (1)
    • South Korea (4)
    • styrene (6)
    • Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) (15)
    • systematic review (1)
    • test rule (17)
    • tributyltin (3)
    • trichloroethylene (TCE) (3)
    • Turkey (3)
    • U.S. states (14)
    • vulnerable populations (1)
    • Walmart (2)
    • worker safety (23)
    • WV chemical spill (11)
  • Archives