December 15, 2007 | Posted by Peter Goldmark in International
This post is by Peter Goldmark, Program Director, Climate and Air, Environmental Defense. Also see his previous dispatch from Bali and background on the meetings.
As I prepare to send this account to New York by email, we know how it all ended.
But I had to suffer through 40 hours of nearly sleepless sturm, drang, chaos and emotional suspense to find out. I’ll take you through some of that, too.
December 13, 2007 | Posted by Peter Goldmark in International
This post is by Peter Goldmark, Program Director, Climate and Air, Environmental Defense. Also see his previous dispatch from Bali
The ministers have arrived – environmental ministers, energy ministers, finance ministers, ministers ordinary and plenipotentiary, and ministers who will one day wind up in the penitentiary. They are driving to and fro in limos with police escorts, blaring their horns at those of us on bicycles.
What this means is that we are entering the last 72 hours of the conference. The nights are getting longer, and the strokes shorter.
But measured even against the background experience that large international conferences frequently undergo a moment of dark despair before dawn brings some sort of last-minute agreement, the last two nights of discord have been dismaying.
December 13, 2007 | Posted by Peter Goldmark in International
This post is by Peter Goldmark, Program Director, Climate and Air, Environmental Defense. Click here for his previous dispatch from Bali.
In the second and final week of climate talks here in Bali, wisps and patches of a larger fabric are beginning to appear.
An informal non-group, with unofficial non-co-chairs from South Africa and Australia, has given birth semi-anonymously to a text which issued from an informal non-meeting and has been widely circulated as a non-paper. It addresses tentatively, with conflicting opinions on some key points, the major open issues facing this conference. These include the touchy questions of what the developing countries should be expected to do, and how to advance the talks on incorporating deforestation into the broader climate framework from which they were excluded a decade ago.
December 10, 2007 | Posted by Peter Goldmark in International
This post is by Peter Goldmark, Program Director, Climate and Air, Environmental Defense.
We are coming to the close of the first week of the Bali climate talks – spring training, you might say, before the major league coaches and star players arrive next week. These closing days of warm-up week were punctuated by several trumpet blasts coming in from overseas.
December 3, 2007 | Posted by Sheryl Canter in International
This post is by Sheryl Canter, and Online Writer and Editorial Manager at Environmental Defense.
In last Friday’s post on the Bali climate talks, Kyle mentioned giving countries incentives to leave their forests standing. This was also the topic of an excellent piece on NPR this morning, "Climate Experts Mull Payment to Stop Deforestation". Our own Annie Petsonk was interviewed for the story:
November 30, 2007 | Posted by Kyle Meng in International
This post is by Kyle Meng, a research fellow at Environmental Defense.
Next week, delegates and negotiators from some 190 countries will descend on the Indonesian island of Bali to determine the fate of a global climate agreement to succeed the Kyoto Protocol. Continuing our long-standing presence at these negotiations, Environmental Defense is sending a team of experts to Bali. Here’s what we’ll be working on.
Read more »
September 27, 2007 | Posted by Keith Gaby in International
The author of today’s post, Keith Gaby, is Communications Director of the climate campaign at Environmental Defense.
Today the White House is hosting a meeting of 15 nations with some of the highest greenhouse gas emissions in the world. They have gathered together to discuss solutions to climate change. The President of Environmental Defense, Fred Krupp, is among a small number of outside speakers who will address the delegates. He decided to attend the conference because – with all those world leaders gathered in one place (not to mention Bush Administration officials) – it’s a chance to push for real action. The White House, which so far has opposed mandatory action on climate change, might not want to hear it, but Fred’s message will be simple and direct:
August 28, 2007 | Posted by Kyle Meng in International
The author of today’s post, Kyle Meng, is a Research Fellow at Environmental Defense.
You probably haven’t heard much about it in the news, but the fourth meeting of the U.N. working group on action to address climate change is happening this week in Vienna, Austria. Negotiators are preparing for the next major international climate agreement – what happens when the Kyoto accord’s carbon market runs out at midnight, December 31, 2012. The goal is to strengthen the carbon market framework so it does an even better job of reducing global greenhouse gas emissions. The question is how best to achieve this.
The Environmental Defense International Climate Team is busy communicating with delegates from various countries to encourage broad participation. Major emitting nations must be part of the accord if we are to avoid potentially catastrophic climate change.
June 27, 2007 | Posted by Annie Petsonk in International
The author of today’s article, Annie Petsonk, is International Counsel at Environmental Defense.
When European countries ratified the Kyoto Protocol, they pledged to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. To prepare, they designed the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS), now the world’s largest greenhouse gas cap-and-trade system.
Since the launch of the EU-ETS in January 2005, allowance prices have been volatile and are currently hovering around zero.
Click on graph to enlarge.
Many people point to these figures and proclaim the EU-ETS a failure. Here’s why they’re wrong.
June 7, 2007 | Posted by Annie Petsonk in International
Today’s guest blogger, Annie Petsonk, is International Counsel at Environmental Defense.
The Group of Eight (G8) is an international forum of eight industrialized countries representing the lion’s share of the world’s economy. High on this year’s agenda is global warming, with European countries calling for a mandatory 50 percent cut in global greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
Recognizing that America must take the lead, the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) has gone even further. This group of 27 leading U.S. companies and environmental groups has urged Congress to enact legislation [PDF] mandating that the U.S. cut emissions by 60 to 80 percent by 2050.
Today the G8 Summit reached an agreement.
Climate 411 is powered by WordPress.
By RSS feed or email:
