{"id":732,"date":"2015-06-02T10:22:49","date_gmt":"2015-06-02T15:22:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/?p=732"},"modified":"2015-06-02T10:22:49","modified_gmt":"2015-06-02T15:22:49","slug":"when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/","title":{"rendered":"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters"},"content":{"rendered":"

Shortly after September 11, 2001, Vice President Dick Cheney gave us what has since become known as the One Percent Doctrine: \u201cIf there\u2019s a 1% chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al-Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response.\u201d<\/p>\n

It inspired at least one book, one war, and many a comparison to the “precautionary principle” familiar to most environmentalists. It\u2019s also wrong.<\/p>\n

One percent isn\u2019t certainty. This doesn\u2019t mean that we shouldn\u2019t take the threat seriously, or that the precautionary principle is wrong, per se. We should, and it isn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

Probabilities matter.<\/p>\n

Take strangelets<\/a> as one extreme. They are particles with the potential to trigger a chain reaction that would reduce the Earth to a dense ball of strange matter before it explodes, all in fractions of a second.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
\n

That\u2019s a high-impact event if there ever was one. It\u2019s also low-probability. Really low probability.<\/p>\n

At the upper bound<\/a>, scientists put the chance of this occurring at somewhere between 0.002% and 0.0000000002% per year, and that\u2019s a generous upper bound.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s not nothing, but it\u2019s pretty close. Should we be spending more on avoiding their creation, or figuring out if they\u2019re even theoretically possible in the first place? Sure. Should we weigh the potential costs against the social benefit that heavy-ion colliders at CERN and Brookhaven provide? Absolutely.<\/p>\n

Should we \u201ctreat it as a certainty\u201d that CERN or Brookhaven are going to cause planetary annihilation? Definitely not.<\/p>\n

Move from strangelets to asteroids, and from a worst-case scenario with the highest imaginable impact, but a very low probability, to one with significantly higher probability, but arguably much lower impact.<\/p>\n

Asteroids come in all shapes and sizes. There\u2019s the 20-meter wide one that unexpectedly exploded above the Russian city of Chelyabinsk<\/a> in 2013, injuring mored than 1,400 people. And then there are 10-kilometer, civilization-ending asteroids.<\/p>\n

Size matters.<\/p>\n

No one would ask for more 20-meter asteroids, but they\u2019re not going to change life on Earth as we know it. We\u2019d expect a 10-kilometer asteroid, of the type that likely killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, once every 50-100 million years. (And no, that does not mean we are \u2018due\u2019 for one. That\u2019s an entirely different statistical fallacy.)<\/p>\n

Luckily, asteroids are a surmountable problem. Given $2 to $3 billion and 10 years, a National Academy study<\/a> estimates that we could test an actual asteroid-deflection technology. It\u2019s not quite as exciting as Bruce Willis in Armageddon, but a nuclear standoff collision is indeed one of the options frequently discussed in this context.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the cost side of the ledger. The benefits for a sufficiently large asteroid would include not destroying civilization. So yes, let\u2019s invest the money. Period.<\/p>\n

Somewhere between strangelets and asteroids rests another high-impact event. Unchecked climate change is bound to have enormous consequences for the planet and humans alike. That much we know.<\/p>\n

What we don\u2019t know \u2014 at least not with certainty \u2014 could make things even worse. The last time concentrations of carbon dioxide stood where they are today, sea levels were up to 20 meters higher than today. Camels lived in Canada. Meanwhile global average surface temperatures were only 1 to 2.5 degrees Celsius (1.8 to 4.5 degrees Fahrenheit) above today’s levels.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Now imagine what the world would like with temperature of 6 degrees Celsius (11 degrees Fahrenheit) higher.\u00a0There\u2019s no other way of putting it than to suggest this would be hell on Earth.<\/span><\/p>\n

And based on a number of conservative assumptions, my co-author Martin L. Weitzman and I calculate in Climate Shock<\/em> that there might well be a 10% chance of an eventual temperature increase of this magnitude happening without a major course correction.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s both high-impact and high-probability.<\/p>\n

Mr. Cheney was wrong in equating 1% to certainty. But he would have been just as wrong if he had said: “One percent is basically zero. We should just cross our fingers and hope that luck is on our side.”<\/p>\n

So what to do? In short, risk management.<\/p>\n

We insure our homes against fires and floods, our families against loss of life, and we should insure our planet against the risk of global catastrophe. To do so, we need to act \u2014 rationally, deliberately, and soon. Our insurance premium: put a price on carbon.<\/p>\n

Instead of pricing carbon, governments right now even pay businesses and individuals to pump more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere due to various energy subsidies, increasing the risk of a global catastrophe. This is crazy and shortsighted, and the opposite of good risk management.<\/p>\n

All of that is based on pretty much the only law we have in economics, the Law of Demand: price goes up, demand goes down.<\/p>\n

It works beautifully, because incentives matter.<\/p>\n

Gernot Wagner serves as lead senior economist at the Environmental Defense Fund and is co-author, with Harvard\u2019s Martin Weitzman, of Climate Shock<\/a> (Princeton, March 2015). This\u00a0op-ed first appeared on Mashable.com<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Shortly after September 11, 2001, Vice President Dick Cheney gave us what has since become known as the One Percent Doctrine: \u201cIf there\u2019s a 1% chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al-Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response.\u201d It inspired at least …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":850,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9532,16683,330],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-climate-science","category-international-agreement","category-politics"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nWhen dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters - Market Forces<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters - Market Forces\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Shortly after September 11, 2001, Vice President Dick Cheney gave us what has since become known as the One Percent Doctrine: \u201cIf there\u2019s a 1% chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al-Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response.\u201d It inspired at least ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Market Forces\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-02T15:22:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gernot Wagner\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Gernot Wagner\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/02\\\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/02\\\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Gernot Wagner\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/848fa9daa71b0c5e7795b5938249145a\"},\"headline\":\"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-02T15:22:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/02\\\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":836,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Climate science\",\"International\",\"Politics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/02\\\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/02\\\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/02\\\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\\\/\",\"name\":\"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters - Market Forces\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-02T15:22:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/848fa9daa71b0c5e7795b5938249145a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/02\\\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/02\\\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/02\\\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/\",\"name\":\"Market Forces\",\"description\":\"Economic Incentives = Environmental Gains\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/848fa9daa71b0c5e7795b5938249145a\",\"name\":\"Gernot Wagner\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0d66a48dd6a3d249bbcced735900500b81779d508e4c8e4ecb8e694ea6517820?s=96&d=mm&r=gb2339d45dd0824feb4b6a542a1cc2c3b\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0d66a48dd6a3d249bbcced735900500b81779d508e4c8e4ecb8e694ea6517820?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0d66a48dd6a3d249bbcced735900500b81779d508e4c8e4ecb8e694ea6517820?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Gernot Wagner\"},\"description\":\"\u00a0\u00a0 Consultant Gernot Wagner, Ph.D., works closely with EDF\u2019s Office of Economic Policy and Analysis, participating in projects relating to climate damages and tipping points, the social cost of carbon, empirical modeling of climate change and human activity, and others.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.edf.org\\\/gwagner\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/markets\\\/author\\\/gwagner\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters - Market Forces","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters - Market Forces","og_description":"Shortly after September 11, 2001, Vice President Dick Cheney gave us what has since become known as the One Percent Doctrine: \u201cIf there\u2019s a 1% chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al-Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response.\u201d It inspired at least ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/","og_site_name":"Market Forces","article_published_time":"2015-06-02T15:22:49+00:00","author":"Gernot Wagner","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Gernot Wagner","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/"},"author":{"name":"Gernot Wagner","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/#\/schema\/person\/848fa9daa71b0c5e7795b5938249145a"},"headline":"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters","datePublished":"2015-06-02T15:22:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/"},"wordCount":836,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Climate science","International","Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/","name":"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters - Market Forces","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-06-02T15:22:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/#\/schema\/person\/848fa9daa71b0c5e7795b5938249145a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/2015\/06\/02\/when-dealing-with-global-warming-the-size-of-the-risk-matters\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When dealing with global warming, the size of the risk matters"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/","name":"Market Forces","description":"Economic Incentives = Environmental Gains","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/#\/schema\/person\/848fa9daa71b0c5e7795b5938249145a","name":"Gernot Wagner","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d66a48dd6a3d249bbcced735900500b81779d508e4c8e4ecb8e694ea6517820?s=96&d=mm&r=gb2339d45dd0824feb4b6a542a1cc2c3b","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d66a48dd6a3d249bbcced735900500b81779d508e4c8e4ecb8e694ea6517820?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d66a48dd6a3d249bbcced735900500b81779d508e4c8e4ecb8e694ea6517820?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Gernot Wagner"},"description":"\u00a0\u00a0 Consultant Gernot Wagner, Ph.D., works closely with EDF\u2019s Office of Economic Policy and Analysis, participating in projects relating to climate damages and tipping points, the social cost of carbon, empirical modeling of climate change and human activity, and others.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.edf.org\/gwagner"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/author\/gwagner\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/850"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=732"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=732"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}