Our impact
For more almost 60 years, we have been building innovative solutions to the biggest environmental challenges — from the soil to the sky.
About us
Guided by science and economics, and committed to climate justice, we work in the places, on the projects and with the people that can make the biggest difference.
Get involved
If we act now — together — there’s still time to build a future where people, the economy and the Earth can all thrive. Every one of us has a role to play. Choose yours.
News and stories
Stay informed and get inspired with our in-depth reporting about the people and ideas making a difference, insight from our experts and the latest environmental progress.
  • Economic Incentives = Environmental Gains

    Newsflash: Clean Air Act saves lives, boosts GDP

    Posted: in Markets 101, Politics, Technology

    Written By

    Gernot Wagner

    Share

    We have sometimes been the bearers of bad news on jobs in the past. Not bad news, really. Realistic news. So excuse me for being a bit giddy at the sight of the latest piece of very realistic—and very good—news.

    The EPA just released a new White Paper that turns out to be as green as it is red, white, and blue.

    Lives and health at a bargain price

    First, it starts with what really matters when considering the impact of the Clean Air Act—health and the corresponding social and economic benefits:

    • 18 million child respiratory illnesses prevented in 1990 alone,
    • 200,000 lives saved that year (160,000 in 2010),
    • total benefits outpacing costs 30:1 since 1990.

    These are the key figures we need to keep in mind. Always.

    Healthy kids means a healthy workforce

    For anyone who isn’t yet satisfied but worries about the economic impact of the Clean Air Act, there’s more good news:

    Protecting children from neurotoxins leads to workers with higher IQs.

    That should be an obvious statement. It also turns out to come with real economic benefits. The latest study by Harvard’s Dale Jorgenson et al shows that the Clean Air Act has boosted productivity and growth:

    GDP in 2010 is 1.5 percent higher than it would have been without the Clean Air Act.

    Again, that’s GDP. Hard economic growth. The number that measures everything except that which makes life worthwhile.

    Clean and competitive

    Lastly, the paper concludes with a look at competitiveness concerns. The verdict: the Clean Air Act does not harm competitiveness.

    That’s not as strong as saying that the Clean Air Act improves U.S. competitiveness. Improving productivity also improves competitiveness, and combining the standard competitiveness arguments with Jorgenson’s productivity results may well show that to be the case.

    But no one to my knowledge has done that yet credibly. (Of course, I’d love to be proven wrong on that point.) To the full credit of EPA and the credibility of its analysis, the paper does not go that far either.

    The White Paper stays well within the mainstream of economic analysis of the Clean Air Act and bears plenty of good news for health, wealth, and the planet.

    Read it at your own peril. It may well be the first piece of economic analysis that makes you giddy yourself.

    One Comment

    1. Posted March 29, 2017 at 9:06 am | Permalink

      It’s awesome to visit this site and reading the views of all mates
      regarding this post, while I am also keen of getting know-how.