{"id":6169,"date":"2017-02-13T11:38:46","date_gmt":"2017-02-13T16:38:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/?p=6169"},"modified":"2017-02-13T11:38:46","modified_gmt":"2017-02-13T16:38:46","slug":"a-toxic-scavenger-hunt-finding-the-first-10-lautenberg-act-chemicals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/2017\/02\/13\/a-toxic-scavenger-hunt-finding-the-first-10-lautenberg-act-chemicals\/","title":{"rendered":"A Toxic Scavenger Hunt: Finding the First 10 Lautenberg Act Chemicals"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jack Pratt<\/a>\u00a0is\u00a0Chemicals Campaign Director<\/em><\/p>\n

Recently, EPA identified the first 10 chemicals for evaluation under our country\u2019s newly reformed chemical safety law. That motivated me to see how easy it would be to find these chemicals in consumer products. The answer: very easy. In fact, while you\u2019ve probably not heard of many of these chemicals, the products that contain them are likely all too familiar.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

For decades our main chemical safety law offered little protection against toxic chemicals. Badly outmoded and outdated, the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 could not even restrict a known carcinogen like asbestos. Fortunately, last year, an overwhelming bipartisan majority in Congress passed legislation<\/a> to reform the law. Included in that new law, the Lautenberg Act, was a requirement that EPA identify the first 10 chemicals to undergo risk evaluations. EPA released that list<\/a> in late November, and included chemicals ranging from household names like asbestos to less well-known ones like Pigment Violet 29. All 10 chemicals had already been designated by EPA as chemicals in need of additional scrutiny.<\/p>\n

To begin my toxic scavenger hunt, I had to first figure out which products use these chemicals. That is harder than it might sound. Companies are not required to include most ingredients on product labels (you can see that for yourself right now, if you have a cleaning product within sight).\u00a0 Nor are there comprehensive databases listing where chemicals are used\u2014even chemicals that pose serious health and environmental concerns, like these 10 chemicals.<\/p>\n

To figure out which products use these chemicals, I had to resort to some advanced Googling. I found some products by searching online for Safety Data Sheets containing the chemicals\u2014these sheets of product information are required by OSHA for potentially harmful substances used in the workplace. Other products and product categories can be found by searching EPA\u2019s CPCat: Chemical and Product Categories <\/em><\/a>database and the National Institute of Health (NIH) Household Products Database<\/a>. The databases are not exhaustive and are further limited because product formulations change often, so all of these sources had to be confirmed using other information.<\/p>\n

Many product categories have no ingredient disclosure whatsoever. For instance, a flame retardant on the list (HBCD) is used in electronics, textiles and elsewhere, but little or no disclosure is required for such products. Even so, product testing has turned up some specific uses\u2014as an example, the Ecology Center<\/a> tested children\u2019s car seats and found the flame retardant HBCD in certain models. Still, there\u2019s just no way to know for sure where else that chemical might be found in our homes or workplaces.<\/p>\n

Where products using these chemicals were identified, however, finding out how I could obtain the products was a cinch (see my list<\/a>).<\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>
The Author’s Desk<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Amazon is my go-to vendor for everything from diapers to razors\u2014and it turns out it can also supply me with products containing PERC, 1-Bromopropane, TCE and many more.<\/p>\n

I also found that purchasers\u2019 reviews provided interesting insights. Lectra Clean Degreaser uses PERC. One Amazon reviewer<\/a> gives the product 5 out of 5 stars, noting \u201cI always keep a couple cans of this handy. It’s also an amazing bug killer. It will kill any fly, wasp or nuisance bug almost instantly upon contact. Put the small red tube in and you’ve got about 8 feet of accurate Armageddon for our insect friends.\u201d\u00a0 Now there\u2019s a reasonably foreseen use the product manufacturer perhaps didn\u2019t intend!<\/p>\n

The labels on these products are also of interest. At my local hardware store, I picked up a NMP-based paint stripper. That product is sold under the brand \u201cBack to Nature\u201d and includes a logo that urges browsers to \u201cGo Green.\u201d That\u2019s pretty upbeat language for a suspected reproductive toxicant.<\/p>\n

Generally, hardware stores are great places to find the chemicals on the first-10 list. Paint strippers using NMP<\/a> and Methylene Chloride<\/a> are readily available. Carbon Tetrachloride can be found in adhesives<\/a>. Craft and hobby stores are good places to find others, like Pigment Violet 29<\/a> (used in some permanent violet paints) and 1-Bromopropane in certain<\/a> adhesives.<\/p>\n

\"asbestos<\/a>
Asbestos brakes<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Nothing can beat an auto supply provider, however. There you can find TCE<\/a>, PERC<\/a> and 1-Bromopropane<\/a> products for degreasing. It\u2019s also where I located the coup de grace<\/em> in the toxic chemical hunt: asbestos brake pads. Despite EPA\u2019s inability to ban asbestos under the old chemical law, asbestos use has been curtailed by lawsuits, thanks to a clear link to mesothelioma. Still, both the state of California<\/a> and domestic brake manufacturers<\/a> indicate that asbestos remains in use in certain imported brake pads, as well as in some stockpiles of after-market brake pads for older-model cars. An online auto supply vendor<\/a> shipped me asbestos brake pads, loose and unwrapped, rattling around in a flimsy cardboard box that includes a small warning label \u201ccontains asbestos fibers, avoid breathing dust.\u201d<\/p>\n

We can chuckle a bit at how casual a company was in shipping a product containing a deadly carcinogen, but this is serious stuff. The men and women who work with asbestos brake pads can get deathly sick, and so can their families<\/a> when the fibers come home on clothing. Paint strippers containing methylene chloride are responsible for numerous <\/a>deaths\u2014people killed at work or at home.<\/p>\n

Mechanics using brake cleaners in auto shops, janitors using stain removers, and dry cleaners using spot cleaning products are likely putting their health at risk every day at work. Pregnant women using these products, say, to prepare a nursery, might inadvertently be harming their developing fetus.<\/p>\n

Tuesday, EPA will take the next step on these 10 chemicals, holding a public meeting<\/a> to discuss and get input on what the scope of their risk evaluations should be (see their use dossiers on each of the 10 chemicals here<\/a>). We should all watch closely and participate where we can to ensure that workers, kids, pregnant woman, and everyone else get the protection they deserve. And if you know of any other products containing these chemicals, please let me know. I still have some room on my desk.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jack Pratt\u00a0is\u00a0Chemicals Campaign Director Recently, EPA identified the first 10 chemicals for evaluation under our country\u2019s newly reformed chemical safety law. That motivated me to see how easy it would be to find these chemicals in consumer products. The answer: very easy. In fact, while you\u2019ve probably not heard of many of these chemicals, the …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39717,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,114108],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-6169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-interest","category-tsca"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39717"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6169\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6169"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=6169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}