{"id":1318,"date":"2011-04-14T13:29:15","date_gmt":"2011-04-14T18:29:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/nanotechnology\/?p=1318"},"modified":"2024-02-12T11:01:14","modified_gmt":"2024-02-12T16:01:14","slug":"tsca-reform-2-0-aka-safe-chemicals-act-of-2011-tastes-great-less-filling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/2011\/04\/14\/tsca-reform-2-0-aka-safe-chemicals-act-of-2011-tastes-great-less-filling\/","title":{"rendered":"TSCA reform 2.0, aka, Safe Chemicals Act of 2011: Tastes great, less filling"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Richard Denison, Ph.D.<\/em><em>, is a Senior Scientist.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/lautenberg.senate.gov\/newsroom\/record.cfm?id=332785\">Safe Chemicals Act of 2011<\/a> was introduced in the U.S. Senate today by Senator Frank Lautenberg and is co-sponsored by Senators Amy Klobuchar, Charles Schumer, and Barbara Boxer.<\/p>\n<p>In the TSCA reform debate, some things haven\u2019t changed from last year:\u00a0 TSCA is just as badly in need of an overhaul, and consumers and the chemical industry\u2019s customers have no more confidence in the safety of chemicals in use today than they did a year ago.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/nanotechnology\/2011\/01\/19\/the-states-were-in-on-chemical-policy-reform-in-2011-30-and-counting\/\">States<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/nanotechnology\/category\/reach\/\">other countries<\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2011\/02\/25\/AR2011022502977_pf.html\">marketplace<\/a> all continue to act to advance modern chemical safety policies and practices.\u00a0 We in the advocacy community are still waiting for the chemical industry to offer some of its own proposals for reform \u2013 though some individual companies and product associations have been more forthcoming.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, the 2011 version of the Safe Chemicals Act has changed in some important ways \u2013 and for the better.\u00a0 It includes a number of improvements over last year\u2019s version that would both boost health protections and ease implementation and workability.<\/p>\n<p><em>[Updated 5-9-11:\u00a0 Here&#8217;s a <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/nanotechnology\/files\/2011\/05\/Summary-of-key-changes-in-Safe-Chemicals-Act-of-2011-vs.-2010-v2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">side-by-side<\/a> comparing the\u00a02011 version to the 2010 version of the Act.]<\/em>\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>I won\u2019t go into a lot of detail here; for that, you can follow these links to <em>Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families<\/em>\u2019 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.saferchemicals.org\/2011\/04\/safe-chemicals-act-of-2011-introduced-today-legislation-would-protect-american-families-from-toxic-chemicals.html\">news release<\/a>\u00a0and my <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/nanotechnology\/files\/2011\/05\/Summary-of-key-changes-in-Safe-Chemicals-Act-of-2011-vs.-2010-v2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">side-by-side<\/a>\u00a0comparison of the 2011 vs. 2010 versions of the bill.\u00a0 (A factsheet on the new bill will be posted here and on the coalition\u2019s website later today.)<\/p>\n<p>But here are a few highlights of the changes made in the new bill:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>It establishes an orderly process that categorizes chemicals into high-, some- and low-concern classes and directs those chemicals along specific paths of action.<\/li>\n<li>It requires expedited action be taken to reduce exposure to chemicals of high concern \u2013 those that are persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) to which people are exposed.<\/li>\n<li>It calls for EPA to identify and prioritize chemicals requiring safety determinations, and tie the pace of that activity to EPA\u2019s capacity to expeditiously make these needed determinations.<\/li>\n<li>It clarifies that EPA would tailor minimum data requirements to different types or classes of chemicals, while still ensuring that basic safety information is provided in a timely manner for all chemicals.<\/li>\n<li>It clarifies that States receiving confidential business information (CBI) must have an agreement in place to ensure the information is kept confidential.<\/li>\n<li>It ensures that State governments have a right to take actions that are different from or in addition to those under TSCA, unless compliance with both the TSCA and the State requirement or standard is impossible.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I am hopeful that this bill, with its enhancements, will push the reset button on the stalled discussion over TSCA reform, and bring all of the parties to the table for an honest dialogue on how we can finally bring this vital law into the modern era. \u00a0It is in everyone\u2019s interest \u2013 health advocates and industry alike \u2013 to restore market, consumer and public confidence in the safety of chemicals.<\/p>\n<p>So here\u2019s a toast to moving TSCA reform forward in this Congress.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Senior Scientist. The Safe Chemicals Act of 2011 was introduced in the U.S. Senate today by Senator Frank Lautenberg and is co-sponsored by Senators Amy Klobuchar, Charles Schumer, and Barbara Boxer. In the TSCA reform debate, some things haven\u2019t changed from last year:\u00a0 TSCA is just as badly in need &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":100,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[44,114108],"tags":[39152,39155,39153,39156,39193,39595,5020],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-1318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-policy","category-tsca","tag-chemical-identity","tag-cbi","tag-data-requirements","tag-persistant-bioaccumulative-and-toxic-pbt","tag-prioritization","tag-safe-chemicals-acts","tag-safer-chemicals-healthy-families"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/100"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1318"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1318\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12628,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1318\/revisions\/12628"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1318"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}