Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Lead Senior Scientist.
Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5
[UPDATE 5-17-15: On April 28, 2015, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee passed a revised version of the Lautenberg Act out of the committee on a bipartisan 15-5 vote. On May 14, 2015, the House Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy passed a revised version of the TSCA Modernization Act of 2015 out of the subcommittee on a bipartisan 21-0 vote. UPDATE 5-28-15: The legislation was formally introduced as H.R. 2576 on May 26, 2015. The new versions made no significant changes to the testing provisions discussed below.]
While most of the attention around legislation to reform the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) has focused on the issue of preemption, it’s important not to lose sight of how new legislation would address fundamental problems in the current law. This post will be the first in a series examining flaws in TSCA and how recent bipartisan reform proposals would address them.
The Lautenberg Act, S. 697, is the bipartisan TSCA reform legislation introduced in the Senate in March. A bipartisan process has also begun in the House, leading to last week’s release of a discussion draft of “The TSCA Modernization Act of 2015.” In this series of posts, I’ll describe how each of these legislative vehicles would address the specific problematic area of the current law I’m discussing.
First up, EPA testing authority. Read More