{"id":12601,"date":"2021-04-06T11:48:18","date_gmt":"2021-04-06T15:48:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/?p=12601"},"modified":"2025-05-13T16:54:54","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T20:54:54","slug":"farmers-bottom-lines-risk-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/2021\/04\/06\/farmers-bottom-lines-risk-climate-change\/","title":{"rendered":"Farmers\u2019 bottom lines at risk as growing conditions change"},"content":{"rendered":"

Iowa currently finds itself in a \u201cGoldilocks climate<\/a>,\u201d with just the right measure and timing of humidity, rainfall and heat that help make the state a national leader in corn and soybean production. However, new research shows that climate change threatens to upset this balance.<\/p>\n

Small shifts in rainfall and temperature can have considerable impacts on crops and farmer livelihoods. To better understand how these shifts could impact farmers, Environmental Defense Fund partnered with K\u00b7Coe Isom, an agricultural accounting and business advisory firm, to produce an in-depth report<\/a> that quantifies the potential localized economic impacts from these shifts that Iowa corn and soy farmers could face as soon as the next 10 to 20 years.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
2019 spring flooding in Iowa along the Missouri River.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Millions of dollars at stake in Iowa alone<\/strong><\/p>\n

Researchers found that farmers could see statewide gross farm revenues reduced by as much as $4.9 billion over the course of a decade \u2014 a loss of 3.6% of Iowa farm revenue from sales of corn, silage and soy.<\/p>\n

Because with climate change agricultural prices are likely to rise, relative to without climate change, the impact to gross farm revenues from yield impacts will be offset to some degree by higher prices<\/a>. Additional research is needed to understand how much agricultural regions like Iowa stand to offset yield losses through climate change-induced price increases.<\/p>\n

With this caveat on unknown price increases, nearly\u00a0every county in Iowa could experience decreases in gross farm revenues with losses of more than $50 million in almost half of the state\u2019s counties in that same timeframe, and losses of more than $100 million in some western counties that are projected to experience higher yield reductions than the rest of the state.<\/p>\n

Reductions in revenue would likely imply reductions in capital investment and off-farm spending. As a result, Iowa\u2019s annual economic output could be reduced by between $367 million and $733 million, causing a statewide loss of 1,270 to 2,530 jobs, and reduce annual state revenue collections by $4 million to $8.3 million.<\/p>\n

\u201cA less desirable choice for the next generation\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

The analysis drills down further by modeling how these crop yield impacts might affect a real representative family corn and soybean operation in central Iowa. The researchers obtained financial data for the farm, including harvest, sales and capital expenditure data, and modeled the impact of projected yield reductions on farm revenue over a five-year period (2014-2019).<\/p>\n

When the anticipated crop yield declines from climate change were retroactively applied to the past five years, researchers found that the family farm would have lost between $50,000 and $90,000 in revenue per year, equaling a total potential loss of $360,000 over the five-year period.<\/p>\n

As the farm owner observed, this reduction in revenue would have also made \u201creturning to the farm a less desirable choice for the next generation,\u201d and would have been \u201cespecially hard on those families newest to farming.\u201d<\/p>\nNew research shows how climate change could affect Iowa farm revenue in the coming decades. <\/a><\/span>Share on X<\/a><\/span>\n

Near-term solutions to avert economic loss<\/strong><\/p>\n

Much can be done to address climate change and minimize the financial impacts on farmers, and this report identifies a few ways federal, state and local governments can help mitigate emissions and help farmers further adapt to climate change.<\/p>\n

Public funding and private sector programs can incentivize management practices that limit greenhouse gas emissions, improve soil health and build resilience in agriculture. For example, the federal crop insurance program could incorporate incentives for farmers that adopt practices that reduce crop yield risk.<\/p>\n

Additionally, public funding could support the development of climate-resilient seed varieties, improvements to nutrient management and other climate adaptation strategies. Investing additional funding in Iowa\u2019s public university systems to assist with the creation of practical, publicly available research could also help farmers put these strategies into practice.<\/p>\n

Iowa\u2019s farmers have adapted to changing farming conditions in the past, but climate change poses a more significant shift that requires a proactive response. Policymakers can help ensure farmers have the resources they need to withstand the growing risks posed by climate change and to protect the livelihoods and revenues that make Iowa a global agricultural leader.<\/p>\n

For more information, download the full report<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

New research shows how climate change could affect Iowa farm revenue in the coming decades.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":145319,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[120554],"tags":[152,57127,113297,120326,40288,248,71725],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-12601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-agriculture","tag-climate-change","tag-corn","tag-farm-finance","tag-farm-revenue","tag-iowa","tag-risk","tag-soybean"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/145319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12601"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12601\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15631,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12601\/revisions\/15631"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12601"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/growingreturns\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=12601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}