Global Clean Air

Pollution data sharing norms are shifting

Sharing code in the tech community hasn’t always been considered a virtue. But GitHub, with its easy interface and mammoth user base, has shown how allowing developers to build on one another’s software code can accelerate innovation of new projects and solve bugs with existing applications, all in a transparent, open-source code hosting platform. The air quality data space is ripe for this kind of move.

Opening access to air quality data

Today, in an effort to address this critical need, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) is unlocking our new Air Quality Data Commons (AQDC), an open-access data platform where people can share and use data from low-and medium-cost air quality sensors. With the introduction of the AQDC, researchers now have access to more than the 60 million plus data points from EDF and our partners’ air pollution studies in Oakland, Houston and London.

Until recently, few outside of government could afford the expensive, specialized equipment needed to measure air pollution other than well-funded scientists, whose data was typically private until after the publication of a peer-reviewed paper. Even then, when they wanted to share their data with others in the field, they could do so only on an ad-hoc basis with limited infrastructure in place to support such collaboration.

Now, as scientists, cities and residents are taking advantage of new low-cost, high-quality sensors, and the amount of air quality data is growing rapidly, as is the need to store and share it. To unlock the benefits of the data for both scientists and society, it must be open and easily accessible.

The Fourth Wave of Environmental Innovation

Transparency drives innovation

Many of our academic partners have long expressed the desire to share their data — once they’ve had the opportunity to analyze it. However, they’ve lacked a platform that would allow them to do so. Similarly, donors are increasingly demanding that the data gleaned from the projects they’ve funded be available for others to use and explore. By building this community, we hope people will see a benefit to not only accessing available data but sharing their own — they can ask questions of fellow air quality scientists about trends they are seeing and learn from others who may have new was of analyzing existing data.

Our partner Karin Tuxen-Bettman, Program Manager for Google Earth Outreach sees value for cities and Google as well. “By adding to the Air Quality Data Commons, cities can feel confident their investments in air monitoring — whether through a fixed stationary network or city-owned vehicle fleets equipped with sensors — are creating enormous value,” she says. “Validated data shared on the AQDC will contribute to the larger database that Google’s Environmental Insights Explorer will pull from, enabling us to build hyperlocal air quality maps for more cities. By making this data available through a transparent process, the AQDC can accelerate action required to improve air quality.”

We look forward to growing this group of data scientists, companies and cities sharing and analyzing data into a robust community who will contribute to the scientific knowledge base, so we can better understand air pollution problems around the world.

The revolution of smaller, cheaper air pollution sensors has brought us here, but the full potential of this revolution will only be realized when a larger community of scientists, cities, residents and activists use the data we collect to take action and improve local air quality. Join us by downloading our data from the AQDC, or upload your own. We look forward to sharing and learning with you.

We are entering a new era of environmental innovation that is driving better alignment between technology and environmental goals — and results. #FourthWave

This was originally posted on Medium.

Also posted in Academic, Monitoring, Science / Authors: / Comments are closed

Digging deeper into London air pollution reduction with Waze

Editor’s Note: Today’s post is by Meg Dupuy-Todd, a Manager at Environmental Defense Fund. Meg has led projects as a part of EDF’s Global Clean Air initiative, including collaborations with Google’s Project Air View in London and Salt Lake City.

Covid-19 has disrupted everyone’s lives, including providing an unfortunate and unwelcome experiment to examine London’s changing commuting and pollution patterns.

At Environmental Defense Fund, we have been collecting air quality data as part of Breathe London, a collaborative project to map and measure pollution in London. We could see that the social distancing measures had changed nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution levels, but we wanted to provide a fuller picture and determine what factors might be at play, including traffic.

Here’s how we used Waze for Cities data to dig deeper into the cause of observed NO2 pollution reductions.

NO2 pollution changes

The Breathe London consortium, with partners including Google Earth Outreach, has collected hyperlocal data to help Londoners better understand pollution in the city. Displayed in real-time on an interactive map, the Breathe London project measures and displays data from air quality sensors across the city.

After social distancing was strongly encouraged in the city in mid-March, the Breathe London monitors saw substantial NO2 pollution reductions — across the full network and especially in the city’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) in Central London. The greatest reductions occurred during daytime hours, between 6:00–22:00, when we also expected traffic to be the highest.

FIGURE 1: Breathe London network hourly mean NO2 measurements during 17 March to 13 April 2020 compared to pre-confinement levels.

FIGURE 1: Breathe London network hourly mean NO2 measurements during 17 March to 13 April 2020 compared to pre-confinement levels.

Exploring Waze data

It was a given that restrictions to help reduce the spread of Covid-19 would change traffic patterns, as workplaces and businesses closed and many people began to work from home. As road transport is a major source of NO2 pollution, naturally, our assumption was there was a link with fewer vehicles on the road.

Through partnership with Waze for Cities program, we had access to Waze-generated anonymous incident and slow-down information in Greater London. Could the data help us understand where and how traffic had reduced?

From previous reviews of Waze data, we knew it would not provide us direct information on traffic volume — the number of vehicles on the road. Instead, we relied on the reported congestion information comparing speed on roads as compared to free-flow traffic. Using Google BigQuery, we were able to analyze the large volume of spatio-temporally resolved data to begin to get a picture of daily traffic congestion in London. Using two distinct geographical boundaries (Greater London and the ULEZ), we decided to calculate, for each hour of the day, the total length of roads where traffic was less than 60% of free flow speed as our proxy for traffic.

With our analysis, we saw that traffic congestion reduced to such an extent that it was approaching free-flow in the vast majority of Greater London roads after the stay-at-home order, even during what used to be peak commuting hours. This is most pronounced in the mostly commercial ULEZ.

FIGURE 2: Waze data — mean total length of congested roads by hour during 17 March to 13 April 2020 compared to pre-confinement levels. (Note difference in scales for Greater London and the ULEZ).

FIGURE 2: Waze data — mean total length of congested roads by hour during 17 March to 13 April 2020 compared to pre-confinement levels. (Note difference in scales for Greater London and the ULEZ).

Putting it all together

With both datasets in hand, our team was able to look at the differences over time of NO2 pollution and traffic congestion. We knew that traffic varied by day of week, so we compared the data to a pre-confinement median by day of week and hour of the day.

We found an apparent association between the reduced pollution levels and lower traffic congestion in London. Examining the daily pattern of traffic congestion also suggests a tie between the biggest drops in pollution and the biggest drops in congestion — which both occur in the late afternoon from around 3 to 7 pm. You can see this depicted in the chart below. Note the difference in “variability in road congestion due to traffic during confinement” (shown in red) and the “weekly congestion average” (shown in green).

FIGURE 3: Breathe London network NO2 measurements during 13 March to 13 April 2020 in comparison to the typical hourly pre-confinement levels.

FIGURE 3: Breathe London network NO2 measurements during 13 March to 13 April 2020 in comparison to the typical hourly pre-confinement levels.

There is still a lot more to learn about the changes in road transport emissions and the relationship to measured pollution, but by incorporating the Waze data into our Covid-19 analysis we were able to shed new light on why NO2 pollution has recently gone down in London.

To learn more about our assessment please visit BreatheLondon.org/covid19.

 

This was originally posted on Medium.

Also posted in London, Monitoring, Science, UK / Authors: / Comments are closed