{"id":8974,"date":"2014-12-11T08:50:18","date_gmt":"2014-12-11T14:50:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?p=8974"},"modified":"2015-01-16T10:42:36","modified_gmt":"2015-01-16T16:42:36","slug":"new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/","title":{"rendered":"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"supreme-court-545534_640\"<\/a><\/p>\n

UPDATE: Yesterday, January 15th<\/sup>, 2015, the Solicitor General formally asked<\/a>\u00a0the Supreme Court to review the demand response case, EPSA v. FERC<\/em>. This action is a welcome step by the Solicitor General. Now the Supreme Court must decide whether or not to hear this important case.<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

Late last week, the Solicitor General signaled its intention to file cert.<\/em> before the Supreme Court in the demand response Order 745 case, EPSA v. FERC<\/em>. Hidden within this legalese is an important update about a significant (and already complex<\/a>) case.<\/p>\n

So what does it all mean?<\/p>\n

First, a bit of background<\/strong><\/p>\n

Demand response<\/a> pays customers to conserve energy when the electric grid is stressed. With demand response, people and technology, not power plants, help meet energy demand. This is good news for customers, who pay less for electricity, the environment, via reductions in harmful air emissions, and the electric grid, by making it more efficient.<\/p>\n

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), tasked with ensuring our nation\u2019s wholesale electricity rates are \u2018just and reasonable,\u2019 created Order 745 to ensure that those providing demand response as a service would be adequately compensated.<\/p>\n

This all changed, however, in a recent court ruling<\/a>, which found that FERC lacked legal authority to regulate demand response. This decision was widely criticized, with White House Counselor John Podesta recently stating<\/a>, \u201cWe think this is a very significant and mistaken decision and we\u2019re hopeful that in time we can see it reversed.\u201d<\/p>\n

After an unsuccessful petition for en banc <\/em>review (meaning that the entire D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals would review the earlier court ruling), FERC was left with one option: ask the Supreme Court to review the decision and reinstate Order 745. However, FERC has no right to appeal to the Supreme Court; instead, the Supreme Court has discretion whether to accept the appeal.<\/p>\n

Supreme Court discretionary review is no walk in the park<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Court receives<\/a> roughly 10,000 petitions for discretionary review (i.e. requests for a case to be heard) each term and only hears 75-80, approximately. For those keeping track at home, that translates to roughly .8 percent.<\/p>\n

However, for a federal agency, there is an initial and vital step that must be taken before even requesting the Supreme Court to review a case: The agency must ask the Solicitor General to bring the case. Why? Because the Solicitor General acts as attorney in all Supreme Court cases where the United States government is involved.[Tweet “#DemandResponse ruling and possible Supreme Court review. What does it all mean? http:\/\/ow.ly\/FKboa “]<\/p>\n

Since the Solicitor General must fulfill this duty for all parts of the Federal government, it naturally has the right to decide against bringing any one particular case. This is both good and bad<\/a>: the Solicitor General often chooses not to bring a case based on what it determines is the likelihood of success; however, the Supreme Court is historically more likely to review a case where the Solicitor General is involved.<\/p>\n

So what does this mean for demand response, FERC, and Order 745?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Solicitor General\u2019s intention to appeal before the Supreme Court signals an important step in the Order 745 case. The Solicitor General, as \u2018gatekeeper\u2019 to cases involving the United States government, has signaled this is a case it believes to be worthy of review by our nation\u2019s highest court. It\u2019s not a responsibility the Solicitor General takes lightly, and its decision shows why this case is so important.<\/p>\n

The next step in this legal process is for the Solicitor General to file its brief by January 15th<\/sup> (stating why the Supreme Court should review the lower court\u2019s decision). From there, all eyes will be on the Supreme Court to see whether or not they decide to take up the case.<\/p>\n

In the meantime, EDF will be watching this case closely and keeping our Energy Exchange readers up-to-date on new advancements. Regardless of the outcome, there\u2019s no doubt demand response is an invaluable clean energy resource that must play an important role in our transition to a clean energy future. How the Supreme Court decides to treat this case will have a significant effect on how demand response is valued in our energy markets, and to what extent Americans are able to reap the full benefits of this important resource.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

UPDATE: Yesterday, January 15th, 2015, the Solicitor General formally asked\u00a0the Supreme Court to review the demand response case, EPSA v. FERC. This action is a welcome step by the Solicitor General. Now the Supreme Court must decide whether or not to hear this important case.   Late last week, the Solicitor General signaled its intention …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39943,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42996,38678],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-8974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-smart-power","category-demand-response"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nNew Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review - Energy Exchange<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review - Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"UPDATE: Yesterday, January 15th, 2015, the Solicitor General formally asked\u00a0the Supreme Court to review the demand response case, EPSA v. FERC. This action is a welcome step by the Solicitor General. Now the Supreme Court must decide whether or not to hear this important case.   Late last week, the Solicitor General signaled its intention ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-12-11T14:50:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-16T16:42:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/12\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael Panfil\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Michael_Panfil\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael Panfil\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Michael Panfil\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7\"},\"headline\":\"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-12-11T14:50:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-16T16:42:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":730,\"commentCount\":4,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Clean Energy\",\"Demand Response\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/\",\"name\":\"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review - Energy Exchange\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-12-11T14:50:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-16T16:42:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/12\\\/11\\\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Energy Exchange\",\"description\":\"Accelerating the clean energy revolution\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7\",\"name\":\"Michael Panfil\",\"description\":\"Attorney Michael Panfil is an attorney for the EDF Clean Energy Program, focusing on reducing energy demand throughout the electric power grid. He also engages on efforts to reduce emissions throughout the United States by advocating for the deployment of smarter technology, improved design standards, and sustainable practices. Follow Michael on Twitter \u00bb\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.edf.org\\\/people\\\/michael-panfil\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Michael_Panfil\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/author\\\/mpanfil\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review - Energy Exchange","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review - Energy Exchange","og_description":"UPDATE: Yesterday, January 15th, 2015, the Solicitor General formally asked\u00a0the Supreme Court to review the demand response case, EPSA v. FERC. This action is a welcome step by the Solicitor General. Now the Supreme Court must decide whether or not to hear this important case.   Late last week, the Solicitor General signaled its intention ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/","og_site_name":"Energy Exchange","article_published_time":"2014-12-11T14:50:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-16T16:42:36+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/12\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Michael Panfil","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Michael_Panfil","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael Panfil","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/"},"author":{"name":"Michael Panfil","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7"},"headline":"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review","datePublished":"2014-12-11T14:50:18+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-16T16:42:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/"},"wordCount":730,"commentCount":4,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/12\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg","articleSection":["Clean Energy","Demand Response"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/","name":"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review - Energy Exchange","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/12\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg","datePublished":"2014-12-11T14:50:18+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-16T16:42:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/12\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/12\/supreme-court-545534_640.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/12\/11\/new-development-in-demand-response-ruling-signals-possible-supreme-court-review\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New Development in Demand Response Ruling Signals Possible Supreme Court Review"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/","name":"Energy Exchange","description":"Accelerating the clean energy revolution","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7","name":"Michael Panfil","description":"Attorney Michael Panfil is an attorney for the EDF Clean Energy Program, focusing on reducing energy demand throughout the electric power grid. He also engages on efforts to reduce emissions throughout the United States by advocating for the deployment of smarter technology, improved design standards, and sustainable practices. Follow Michael on Twitter \u00bb","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.edf.org\/people\/michael-panfil","https:\/\/x.com\/Michael_Panfil"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/author\/mpanfil\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39943"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8974"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8974\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8974"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=8974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}