{"id":8704,"date":"2014-11-06T13:54:15","date_gmt":"2014-11-06T19:54:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?p=8704"},"modified":"2014-11-06T13:55:05","modified_gmt":"2014-11-06T19:55:05","slug":"wyomings-second-swing-at-curbing-oil-gas-air-pollution-could-be-home-run","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/11\/06\/wyomings-second-swing-at-curbing-oil-gas-air-pollution-could-be-home-run\/","title":{"rendered":"Wyoming\u2019s Second Swing at Curbing Oil, Gas Air Pollution Could be Home Run"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"OLYMPUS<\/a>Late last week Wyoming air regulators took a second crack at a proposed rule<\/a> to fix a serious ozone pollution problem in the state\u2019s Upper Green River Basin. To use a baseball analogy, this rule designed to reduce pollution from the oil and gas industry, is a solid double.<\/p>\n

This proposal improves upon a version released in June. The updated rule<\/a> extends inspection requirements to compressor stations to capture more of the leaks that create air pollution and the methane that is the industry\u2019s main product. And it eliminates provisions that\u2014in some cases–would have allowed companies to remove certain devices from well sites that we know reduce pollution.<\/p>\n

Both changes are improvements that EDF and local allies have advocated for<\/a> and the Mead Administration deserves praise for leadership in this area. Once finalized and implemented, this rule will form the backbone of the state\u2019s plan to clean up the air in and around Pinedale, Wyoming, that has become dangerously polluted by harmful emissions from the oil and gas industry.<\/p>\n

While this rule certainly shows improvement, additional, cost-effective air pollution reductions<\/a> are still available if the state is willing to seize them. These include:<\/p>\n