{"id":6665,"date":"2014-04-01T20:22:50","date_gmt":"2014-04-01T20:22:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?p=6665"},"modified":"2015-12-21T12:44:25","modified_gmt":"2015-12-21T18:44:25","slug":"demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/","title":{"rendered":"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Source:<\/a>
Source: North America Power Partners<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Texas Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has, yet again, kicked the can down the road on securing reliable energy to power the state\u2019s growing population. The PUC, the state agency charged with managing electricity rates, meets to securely plan for the future, yet they continue to delay planning meetings. This will benefit no one in the short or long-run. To secure reliable power and safeguard against threats of blackouts, the PUC needs to keep pace with the times and leverage technologies that require little to no water, generate negligible carbon emissions<\/a>, and can respond to the call for electricity.<\/p>\n

Last week, the PUC decided to postpone <\/i>indefinitely<\/i><\/a> an important meeting, originally scheduled for May, to discuss Texas\u2019 recent blackout scares. The PUC has been in a heated debate over Texas\u2019 electricity market structure, and in the midst of backlash from stakeholders, they have decided to push the decision onto the Legislature in 2015. This is not necessarily in the best interest of the state. Texans were asked to conserve<\/a> energy several times this winter after colder temperatures forced heating units to ramp up. This request to turn down thermostats for threat of rolling blackouts came at the same time the state power grid operator assured Texans that reliability is on the upswing<\/a>. But it\u2019s time Texas faces the facts.<\/p>\n

The state\u2019s current electricity market is too reliant on inefficient, fossil-fueled power plants, which failed repeatedly this winter to meet the electricity needs of Texas\u2019 growing economy.<\/p>\n

More power plants is not the answer<\/strong><\/p>\n

Earlier this year, the Brattle Group released its latest analysis<\/a> of Texas\u2019 electricity market, measuring the tradeoffs between the cost of building more power plants and the cost of increased blackouts. As we have highlighted<\/a> before, the debate at the PUC centers on whether the state should keep the status-quo, an energy-only market, or switch to a capacity market<\/a>, which would provide power plants and demand response companies with a premium capacity payment.\u00a0 Simply paying for energy in the form of \u201ccapacity payments\u201d would be similar to insurance payments, meaning Texans would pay power plants to exist in hopes of less risk of blackouts. Yet a key conclusion from the report reiterates what many consumer advocates have said all along: paying power companies to build extra power plants as a solution for managing the state\u2019s growing population and increasingly frequent extreme weather events is not the most cost-effective solution for Texans. This is wasteful of taxpayer\u2019s money and does nothing to curb Texas\u2019 reliance on fossil fuels.<\/p>\n

So what is the most cost-effective solution?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The overall cheapest option for Texans is to keep the market the way it is, according to Brattle. Texas needs flexible, cost-effective resources like demand response to reduce the risk of rolling blackouts without increasing costs for consumers. Flexible technologies \u2013 like energy efficiency, renewable energy, and demand response \u2013 can respond quickly in times of need, require little to no water, improve air quality, and provide stability to the power grid. This is the type of performance worth investing in.<\/p>\n

Demand response doesn\u2019t just save money for consumers and help keep the grid stable<\/a>, it\u2019s good for utilities and power companies, too. By incenting customers to use less power during peak demand, when electricity prices are at their highest, utilities and power providers can avoid buying costly, extra power. For instance, when air conditioning demand peaks during the hottest hours of the year, Texas\u2019 utilities would pay customers to voluntarily reduce energy use, thereby offsetting the need to ramp up an out-of-use (and expensive) power plant. Only customers that have volunteered to would see their energy use lower, unlike a blackout scenario where everyone would be affected.<\/p>\n

Whatever changes state regulators decide on will have a lasting effect on Texans for years to come. And relying on the old mentality, \u201cif it ain\u2019t broke, don\u2019t fix it,\u201d is not good enough. Texas already has over six million smart meters<\/a>. It\u2019s time to finish the smart grid investment we\u2019ve already started and adopt more customer-facing smart grid technologies, like demand response. This will reduce our reliance on fossil-fuel power plants, empower consumers, and increase reliability. State lawmakers should enact rules to prioritize demand response, so that Texans can enjoy both affordable electricity and a reliable electric grid\u2014without increasing pollution.<\/p>\n

This commentary originally appeared on our Texas Clean Air Matters blog<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Texas Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has, yet again, kicked the can down the road on securing reliable energy to power the state\u2019s growing population. The PUC, the state agency charged with managing electricity rates, meets to securely plan for the future, yet they continue to delay planning meetings. This will benefit no one in …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6408,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42996,38678,84830,181],"tags":[53049],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-6665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-smart-power","category-demand-response","category-grid-modernization","category-texas","tag-third-way"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nDemand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid - Energy Exchange<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid - Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Texas Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has, yet again, kicked the can down the road on securing reliable energy to power the state\u2019s growing population. The PUC, the state agency charged with managing electricity rates, meets to securely plan for the future, yet they continue to delay planning meetings. This will benefit no one in ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-04-01T20:22:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-21T18:44:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/04\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marita Mirzatuny\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Marita Mirzatuny\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Marita Mirzatuny\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/3b071de110935f765e83f238c7196151\"},\"headline\":\"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-04-01T20:22:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-21T18:44:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":758,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Third Way\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Clean Energy\",\"Demand Response\",\"Grid Modernization\",\"Texas\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/\",\"name\":\"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid - Energy Exchange\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-04-01T20:22:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-21T18:44:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/3b071de110935f765e83f238c7196151\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Energy Exchange\",\"description\":\"Accelerating the clean energy revolution\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/3b071de110935f765e83f238c7196151\",\"name\":\"Marita Mirzatuny\",\"description\":\"Project Manager Marita is a project manager for EDF\u2019s US Climate and Energy Program, working on issues in Texas such as smart grid development, renewables, demand response, and policy involving the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT).\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.edf.org\\\/people\\\/marita-mirzatuny\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/author\\\/mmirzatuny\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid - Energy Exchange","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid - Energy Exchange","og_description":"The Texas Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has, yet again, kicked the can down the road on securing reliable energy to power the state\u2019s growing population. The PUC, the state agency charged with managing electricity rates, meets to securely plan for the future, yet they continue to delay planning meetings. This will benefit no one in ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/","og_site_name":"Energy Exchange","article_published_time":"2014-04-01T20:22:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-21T18:44:25+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/04\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Marita Mirzatuny","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Marita Mirzatuny","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/"},"author":{"name":"Marita Mirzatuny","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/3b071de110935f765e83f238c7196151"},"headline":"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid","datePublished":"2014-04-01T20:22:50+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-21T18:44:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/"},"wordCount":758,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/04\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg","keywords":["Third Way"],"articleSection":["Clean Energy","Demand Response","Grid Modernization","Texas"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/","name":"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid - Energy Exchange","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/04\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg","datePublished":"2014-04-01T20:22:50+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-21T18:44:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/3b071de110935f765e83f238c7196151"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/04\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2014\/04\/Source-North-America-Power-Partners.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2014\/04\/01\/demand-response-is-the-best-cure-for-texas-ailing-grid\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Demand Response Is the Best Cure for Texas\u2019 Ailing Grid"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/","name":"Energy Exchange","description":"Accelerating the clean energy revolution","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/3b071de110935f765e83f238c7196151","name":"Marita Mirzatuny","description":"Project Manager Marita is a project manager for EDF\u2019s US Climate and Energy Program, working on issues in Texas such as smart grid development, renewables, demand response, and policy involving the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT).","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.edf.org\/people\/marita-mirzatuny"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/author\/mmirzatuny\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6408"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6665\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6665"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=6665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}