{"id":4446,"date":"2013-07-08T15:31:13","date_gmt":"2013-07-08T15:31:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?p=4446"},"modified":"2013-07-08T19:38:44","modified_gmt":"2013-07-08T19:38:44","slug":"now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/","title":{"rendered":"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research"},"content":{"rendered":"

This commentary, authored by Robert Fares, originally appeared on Scientific American’s “Plugged In” blog<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Modeled after the successful Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) uses small grants to bring transformative energy technologies to commercialization. (Source: ARPA-E)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Last month, a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives quietly voted<\/a> to gut funding for the U.S. Department of Energy\u2019s (DOE\u2019s) efforts to promote innovative energy research. The DOE\u2019s Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E)<\/a> was first on the chopping block. The subcommittee voted to slash its funding from the current level of $252 million to just $50 million\u2014an 80% cut. On top of that, the subcommittee cut funding for the DOE\u2019s work on renewable energy<\/a> in half.<\/p>\n

ARPA-E was created by the 2007 America COMPETES Act<\/a>,<\/span> signed into law by then President George W. Bush. The agency is modeled after the successful Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)<\/a>\u2014credited for transformative innovations like GPS and computer networking. ARPA-E is intended to facilitate small government grants for basic research into transformative energy technologies that are too risky for the private sector. Since its first funding allocation<\/a> from the Obama administration in 2009, ARPA-E awardees have already doubled<\/a> the world-record energy density for a rechargeable lithium-ion battery and pioneered<\/a> a near-isothermal compressed air energy storage system.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
With help from a $4 million ARPA-E grant, Envia Systems doubled the world-record energy density for a rechargeable lithium-ion battery. (Source: Envia Systems)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

ARPA-E\u2019s numerous success stories and proven funding model have given it a measure of bipartisan support. ARPA-E is a major component of the Obama administration\u2019s push for clean energy jobs, drawing high praise<\/a> from Vice President Biden. Notably, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney agrees with the administration<\/a> on this point: \u201cGovernment has a role to play in innovation in the energy industry. History\u00a0shows that the United States has moved forward in astonishing ways thanks to\u00a0national investment in basic research and advanced technology.\u201d In addition to Romney, other key Republican lawmakers have voiced support for ARPA-E: Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee both spoke<\/a> at ARPA-E\u2019s annual summit in February. Considering the fact that ARPA-E has already attracted over $450 million<\/a> in private sector funding, its bipartisan support should come as no surprise.<\/p>\n

This recent move to axe clean energy funding does nothing to truly address our budget woes and hurts our footing in the international race towards a clean energy future. As President Obama laid out in his landmark speech on climate change<\/a>, it is time for Americans to come together and create a smart, clean, low-carbon economy that protects future generations from the threat of climate change. Programs like ARPA-E provide the vital funding needed to see innovative energy technologies through to commercialization.Now is not the time to cut these vital programs. We must continue supporting clean energy research and inspiring the next great generation of scientists and engineers.<\/p>\n

Robert Fares is a Communications Intern at\u00a0Environmental Defense Fund<\/a>\u00a0and a Ph.D. student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. Robert\u2019s research at The University of Texas looks at how energy storage models can be used with large-scale data and optimization for economic operational management of battery energy storage. Through his research, Robert hopes to demonstrate the marketability and technical compatibility of emerging storage technologies.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This commentary, authored by Robert Fares, originally appeared on Scientific American’s “Plugged In” blog. Last month, a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives quietly voted to gut funding for the U.S. Department of Energy\u2019s (DOE\u2019s) efforts to promote innovative energy research. The DOE\u2019s Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) was first on the …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,177],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-4446","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","category-renewable-energy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nNow Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research - Energy Exchange<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research - Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This commentary, authored by Robert Fares, originally appeared on Scientific American’s “Plugged In” blog. Last month, a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives quietly voted to gut funding for the U.S. Department of Energy\u2019s (DOE\u2019s) efforts to promote innovative energy research. The DOE\u2019s Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) was first on the ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-07-08T15:31:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-07-08T19:38:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2013\/07\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"EDF Blogs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"EDF Blogs\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"EDF Blogs\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/aae063915aaf10301a322185853c51d3\"},\"headline\":\"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-07-08T15:31:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-07-08T19:38:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":596,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"General\",\"Renewable Energy\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/\",\"name\":\"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research - Energy Exchange\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-07-08T15:31:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-07-08T19:38:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/aae063915aaf10301a322185853c51d3\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2013\\\/07\\\/08\\\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Energy Exchange\",\"description\":\"Accelerating the clean energy revolution\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/aae063915aaf10301a322185853c51d3\",\"name\":\"EDF Blogs\",\"description\":\"From time to time, the Energy Exchange blog includes posts from infrequent contributors, such as other EDF scientists and staff. Since these authors vary, we use this standard author bio profile for guest posts. For more information about this author, please see his\\\/her link at the beginning of the post.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.edf.org\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research - Energy Exchange","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research - Energy Exchange","og_description":"This commentary, authored by Robert Fares, originally appeared on Scientific American’s “Plugged In” blog. Last month, a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives quietly voted to gut funding for the U.S. Department of Energy\u2019s (DOE\u2019s) efforts to promote innovative energy research. The DOE\u2019s Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) was first on the ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/","og_site_name":"Energy Exchange","article_published_time":"2013-07-08T15:31:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-07-08T19:38:44+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2013\/07\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"EDF Blogs","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"EDF Blogs","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/"},"author":{"name":"EDF Blogs","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/aae063915aaf10301a322185853c51d3"},"headline":"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research","datePublished":"2013-07-08T15:31:13+00:00","dateModified":"2013-07-08T19:38:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/"},"wordCount":596,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2013\/07\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg","articleSection":["General","Renewable Energy"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/","name":"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research - Energy Exchange","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2013\/07\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg","datePublished":"2013-07-08T15:31:13+00:00","dateModified":"2013-07-08T19:38:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/aae063915aaf10301a322185853c51d3"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2013\/07\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2013\/07\/ARPA-E-300x167.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2013\/07\/08\/now-is-not-the-time-to-gut-funding-for-innovative-energy-research\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Now Is Not The Time To Gut Funding For Innovative Energy Research"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/","name":"Energy Exchange","description":"Accelerating the clean energy revolution","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/aae063915aaf10301a322185853c51d3","name":"EDF Blogs","description":"From time to time, the Energy Exchange blog includes posts from infrequent contributors, such as other EDF scientists and staff. Since these authors vary, we use this standard author bio profile for guest posts. For more information about this author, please see his\/her link at the beginning of the post.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.edf.org"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4446","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4446"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4446\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4446"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4446"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}