{"id":26,"date":"2009-05-15T15:00:44","date_gmt":"2009-05-15T15:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/texasenergyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/"},"modified":"2011-03-30T14:29:33","modified_gmt":"2011-03-30T14:29:33","slug":"ercot-study-why","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/","title":{"rendered":"ERCOT Study: Why?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Colin<\/a>I am perplexed. Texas news headlines are hyping the phrases \u201cbig electric bill\u201d and \u201ctax could raise bills,\u201d misleading ratepayers everywhere and leaving out a big chunk of the whole story.<\/p>\n

ERCOT<\/a> released its “analysis” of the impacts of CO2 legislation on Texas this week and I’m not really sure what it’s an analysis of, except maybe some bizarre world in which the only option available for reducing carbon emissions in Texas in the next five years is switching entirely from coal-fired electricity to natural gas-fired electricity.<\/p>\n

The whole story? In its much-publicized study, ERCOT failed to incorporate carbon offsets, energy efficiency or the impact of renewable energy beyond what is already planned, in the current bill before congress.<\/p>\n

In fact, in the first paragraph of the paper, ERCOT acknowledges that it has not attempted to determine the equilibrium price of allowances, which is one of the fundamental benefits of using free-market economics to drive innovation and decision making in reducing greenhouse gasses.\u00a0<\/p>\n

To put it simply, what ERCOT is saying is: \u201cThere are a host of inexpensive ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Waxman-Markey bill. We have not analyzed any of those.\u201d\u00a0 Given the statement Commissioner Smitherman, who requested the report, gave the Dallas Morning News<\/a>, I can understand why ERCOT may have focused on such a narrow portion of the legislation. \u201cI’m more concerned about climate change legislation than I am about climate change,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

This tells me two things. First, the report did not look at the real full impact of the legislation, which the EPA says in its report<\/a> would cost the average household about $98 per year. Second, Commissioner Smitherman hasn’t been listening to all of the scientists and economists who talk about the costs of inaction <\/a>and stress that the agricultural sector in Texas alone stands to lose $3.6 to $6.5 Billion if we do nothing to address climate change.<\/p>\n

And that’s just the beginning. While the ERCOT report fails to figure in the least expensive solutions to reducing our GHG emissions, it does go on to say that people will use less energy and the impact of that \u2013 along with all the extra wind generation the good people of Texas had the foresight to build transmission for \u2013 will save us a total of 60 percent of ERCOT’s projected “costs” of the Waxman-Markey bill.\u00a0<\/p>\n

None of this of course looks into the combined impact of Senator Watson’s SB 541 and Senator Fraser’s SB 545, which will develop solar in that same expanded transmission zone, and other renewable energy around Texas.\u00a0 I can tell you that it would have a similar or greater impact on reducing our GHG emissions.\u00a0 In total, this could lead to a reduction of 90 percent of ERCOT’s projected costs if Texas takes back its lead in renewable energy. Of course, I haven’t even mentioned all of the studies showing\u00a0that energy efficiency <\/a>(a net money saver for customers) and agricultural offsets could meet all of our emissions goals through 2030, saving even more money than renewable energy and supporting our agricultural jobs.<\/p>\n

What all of this tells me is that ERCOT has looked at the most expensive way for Texas to meet it\u2019s carbon reduction goals, even though vastly cheaper options exist that will create an entirely new clean energy economy instead of giving all of our money to the oil and gas industry.\u00a0 The only question I have left for ERCOT is why?\u00a0 Why leave out the cheapest solutions in “analyzing” an inherently market-based policy that will focus only on the cheapest solutions?\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I am perplexed. Texas news headlines are hyping the phrases \u201cbig electric bill\u201d and \u201ctax could raise bills,\u201d misleading ratepayers everywhere and leaving out a big chunk of the whole story. ERCOT released its “analysis” of the impacts of CO2 legislation on Texas this week and I’m not really sure what it’s an analysis of, …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1508,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[177,181],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-26","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-renewable-energy","category-texas"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nERCOT Study: Why? - Energy Exchange<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ERCOT Study: Why? - Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I am perplexed. Texas news headlines are hyping the phrases \u201cbig electric bill\u201d and \u201ctax could raise bills,\u201d misleading ratepayers everywhere and leaving out a big chunk of the whole story. ERCOT released its “analysis” of the impacts of CO2 legislation on Texas this week and I’m not really sure what it’s an analysis of, ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-15T15:00:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2011-03-30T14:29:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"ERCOT Study: Why?\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-15T15:00:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-03-30T14:29:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/\"},\"wordCount\":603,\"commentCount\":8,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Renewable Energy\",\"Texas\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/\",\"name\":\"ERCOT Study: Why? - Energy Exchange\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-15T15:00:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-03-30T14:29:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"ERCOT Study: Why?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/\",\"name\":\"Energy Exchange\",\"description\":\"Accelerating the clean energy revolution\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/author\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ERCOT Study: Why? - Energy Exchange","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ERCOT Study: Why? - Energy Exchange","og_description":"I am perplexed. Texas news headlines are hyping the phrases \u201cbig electric bill\u201d and \u201ctax could raise bills,\u201d misleading ratepayers everywhere and leaving out a big chunk of the whole story. ERCOT released its “analysis” of the impacts of CO2 legislation on Texas this week and I’m not really sure what it’s an analysis of, ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/","og_site_name":"Energy Exchange","article_published_time":"2009-05-15T15:00:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2011-03-30T14:29:33+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"ERCOT Study: Why?","datePublished":"2009-05-15T15:00:44+00:00","dateModified":"2011-03-30T14:29:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/"},"wordCount":603,"commentCount":8,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg","articleSection":["Renewable Energy","Texas"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/","name":"ERCOT Study: Why? - Energy Exchange","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg","datePublished":"2009-05-15T15:00:44+00:00","dateModified":"2011-03-30T14:29:33+00:00","author":{"@id":""},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/content_images\/Colin_Meehan.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2009\/05\/15\/ercot-study-why\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"ERCOT Study: Why?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/","name":"Energy Exchange","description":"Accelerating the clean energy revolution","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/author\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1508"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=26"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}