{"id":12734,"date":"2012-01-12T20:15:50","date_gmt":"2012-01-13T02:15:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?p=12734"},"modified":"2016-03-23T20:16:41","modified_gmt":"2016-03-24T01:16:41","slug":"in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/","title":{"rendered":"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/californiadream\/files\/2012\/01\/TOC.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/californiadream\/files\/2012\/01\/TOC.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"211\" height=\"198\" \/><\/a>In late December, a federal court district judge in Fresno ruled that California\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arb.ca.gov\/fuels\/lcfs\/lcfs.htm\">Low Carbon Fuel Standard<\/a> (LCFS) was unconstitutional because it violates the limits imposed on states by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The ruling halted its enforcement pending appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.<\/p>\n<p>The suit was filed by refiners, truckers, and fuel production companies &#8211; most of which have the bulk of their operations out of state and would rather litigate than innovate, putting profits before people. It is yet another industry attack on the state\u2019s landmark climate and energy law, AB 32, which consists of measures such as the LCFS that will be used to reduce California\u2019s greenhouse gas pollution to 1990 levels by 2020.<\/p>\n<p>California\u2019s LCFS is a scientifically credible standard that was carefully designed to cut climate change pollution, protect and improve public health and drive innovation that delivers economic benefits. These are among the key reasons why Environmental Defense Fund joined <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2012-01-07\/california-appeals-ruling-blocking-low-carbon-fuel-standard-1-.html\">California and three other environmental organizations in an appeal of the suit asking to keep the LCFS<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2012-01-07\/california-appeals-ruling-blocking-low-carbon-fuel-standard-1-.html\"> intact<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cutting climate pollution<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As designed, the LCFS reduces the amount of carbon released during the production, shipping and use of transportation fuels sold in California by 10% between now and 2020. This \u201clifecycle\u201d approach to managing emissions from fuels was pioneered by Argonne National Labs and is the accepted standard used by the federal EPA and other states and nations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Improving air quality<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>California has some of the worst air quality in the country. In addition to fighting climate change, the LCFS cuts pollution that poisons our air and water and results in respiratory ailments and diseases that cost us tens of billions of dollars a year in health care costs. By facilitating newer, less polluting transportation fuels, the LCFS can help California finally achieve attainment of federal health standards for air quality.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Driving innovation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The standard would deliver significant benefits to the state and national economy. California is home to the world\u2019s most advanced biofuel and electric car companies, hydrogen infrastructure, and transportation fuel research institutions. These entities operate here because California has created an environment where scientific enterprises can prosper, and in the case of the LCFS, earn a return on investment by reducing pollution cheaply and quickly. Over the next decade, the standard provides new opportunity for innovators in and out of California to reap the rewards of developing cheap and lasting alternatives to gasoline.<\/p>\n<p>The deep-pocketed oil industry can easily afford to protect its profits. Yet, as The New York Times recently noted in an editorial under the headline, \u2018<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/10\/24\/opinion\/californias-persistence-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions.html?_r=2&amp;emc=eta1\">California\u2019s Persistence<\/a>,\u2019 the industry is up against a state that \u2018has a long and productive history as a leader in environmental policy, requiring cleaner cars and power plants and more energy-efficient appliances.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>We are confident that this standard will be restored on appeal, enabling California to continue doing what it excels at: driving advances in energy that grow the economy and protect our environment.<\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In late December, a federal court district judge in Fresno ruled that California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) was unconstitutional because it violates the limits imposed on states by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The ruling halted its enforcement pending appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":919,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-12734","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard - Energy Exchange<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard - Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In late December, a federal court district judge in Fresno ruled that California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) was unconstitutional because it violates the limits imposed on states by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The ruling halted its enforcement pending appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-01-13T02:15:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-24T01:16:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/californiadream\/files\/2012\/01\/TOC.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Tim O&#039;Connor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Tim O&#039;Connor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Tim O'Connor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/07ed5852e30b31400a51d0a941e7479a\"},\"headline\":\"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-01-13T02:15:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-24T01:16:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":512,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/californiadream\\\/files\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/TOC.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"General\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/\",\"name\":\"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard - Energy Exchange\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/californiadream\\\/files\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/TOC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-01-13T02:15:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-24T01:16:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/07ed5852e30b31400a51d0a941e7479a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/californiadream\\\/files\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/TOC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/californiadream\\\/files\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/TOC.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2012\\\/01\\\/12\\\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Energy Exchange\",\"description\":\"Accelerating the clean energy revolution\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/07ed5852e30b31400a51d0a941e7479a\",\"name\":\"Tim O'Connor\",\"description\":\"Tim O\u2019Connor is a Senior Director and Senior Attorney in EDF\u2019s Energy program. He leads the organization\u2019s strategy on energy transitions \u2013 focused on reducing fossil fuel use and dependence in global heavy and medium-duty transport markets and the built environment. Follow Tim on Twitter \u00bb\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.edf.org\\\/people\\\/timothy-oconnor\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/author\\\/toconnor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard - Energy Exchange","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard - Energy Exchange","og_description":"In late December, a federal court district judge in Fresno ruled that California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) was unconstitutional because it violates the limits imposed on states by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The ruling halted its enforcement pending appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/","og_site_name":"Energy Exchange","article_published_time":"2012-01-13T02:15:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-24T01:16:41+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/californiadream\/files\/2012\/01\/TOC.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Tim O'Connor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Tim O'Connor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/"},"author":{"name":"Tim O'Connor","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/07ed5852e30b31400a51d0a941e7479a"},"headline":"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard","datePublished":"2012-01-13T02:15:50+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-24T01:16:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/"},"wordCount":512,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/californiadream\/files\/2012\/01\/TOC.jpg","articleSection":["General"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/","name":"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard - Energy Exchange","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/californiadream\/files\/2012\/01\/TOC.jpg","datePublished":"2012-01-13T02:15:50+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-24T01:16:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/07ed5852e30b31400a51d0a941e7479a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/californiadream\/files\/2012\/01\/TOC.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/californiadream\/files\/2012\/01\/TOC.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2012\/01\/12\/in-defense-of-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In Defense of California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/","name":"Energy Exchange","description":"Accelerating the clean energy revolution","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/07ed5852e30b31400a51d0a941e7479a","name":"Tim O'Connor","description":"Tim O\u2019Connor is a Senior Director and Senior Attorney in EDF\u2019s Energy program. He leads the organization\u2019s strategy on energy transitions \u2013 focused on reducing fossil fuel use and dependence in global heavy and medium-duty transport markets and the built environment. Follow Tim on Twitter \u00bb","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.edf.org\/people\/timothy-oconnor"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/author\/toconnor\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12734","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/919"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12734"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12734\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12734"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12734"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12734"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=12734"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}