{"id":11080,"date":"2015-09-11T11:16:00","date_gmt":"2015-09-11T16:16:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?p=11080"},"modified":"2017-03-01T16:53:17","modified_gmt":"2017-03-01T21:53:17","slug":"epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/","title":{"rendered":"EPA&#8217;s Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-11082 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"7580640864_0e9392584b_z\" width=\"308\" height=\"205\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z.jpg 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 308px) 100vw, 308px\" \/><\/a>One study cannot answer every question about water pollution risks from oil and gas drilling, nor should it be expected to. But as my colleague Nichole Saunders <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/07\/30\/hydraulic-fracturing-and-the-epa-water-study-where-do-we-go-from-here\/\">pointed out<\/a>, the oft-quoted statement of <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.epa.gov\/hfstudy\/executive-summary-hydraulic-fracturing-study-draft-assessment-2015\">EPA\u2019s water study<\/a> \u2013 that it found no evidence of \u201cwidespread, systemic impacts on drinking water sources\u201d\u2013 implied to some that activities related to hydraulic fracturing had been declared risk-free.<\/p>\n<p>That couldn&#8217;t be further from the truth.<\/p>\n<p>EPA\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.epa.gov\/hfstudy\">draft report<\/a> acknowledged in several places that available data on the impact of oil and gas operations on water resources was severely lacking. The limited scope, the large number of unknowns and the inadequate data were then used to characterize national impacts, leading to the \u201cno widespread, systemic impacts\u201d conclusion simply because confirmed impacts were small compared to the nationwide number of wells. That\u2019s dangerous math that added up to misinterpretation and confusion following the report\u2019s release.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Just because something isn\u2019t happening everywhere doesn\u2019t mean it can\u2019t happen anywhere. In fact, it\u2019s this latter story that EPA\u2019s report illuminates quite well. Documented in numerous places in the nearly 1,000 page report are multiple accounts of local impacts and incidences of water contamination.<\/p>\n<p>EDF has concluded a thorough review of the report and \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/08\/EDF-SAB-Comments-HF-Study-8.28.15.pdf\">submitted comments<\/a> to EPA\u2019s Science and Advisory Board. We asked EPA to simply communicate more clearly, dig deeper, get better data, and keep researching. This draft report is a good first step, but much more is needed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EPA\u2019s report should communicate the overall findings of the study more clearly.<\/strong> For example, the report\u2019s press release indicates that the \u201cassessment shows\u201d that activities have not led to widespread, systemic impacts. Yet, the executive summary concludes the agency did \u201cnot find evidence\u201d of impacts. These conclusions are inconsistent and mean different things. How EPA\u2019s explains its scope and findings must be improved to better reflect the realities of the full analysis and provide clarity to the public.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EPA\u2019s report should dig deeper to more thoroughly answer questions presented in the final study plan.<\/strong> Key elements of the well injection chapter are completely absent, leaving important questions unanswered about subsurface fluid movement and interactions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EPA\u2019s report could have relied on better data.<\/strong> For example, the EPA report relied heavily on data from an early version of FracFocus, the national tool for reporting chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing. Since EPA\u2019s review, FracFocus 3.0 has launched with new data representing a more current picture of chemicals in use today.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EPA should keep researching.<\/strong> The number of unknowns and data gaps that inhibit full and accurate conclusions is significant. Further, EPA\u2019s assessment was limited in scope, leaving out important activities in the oil and gas production and supply chain that create significant risks to drinking water. Perhaps most importantly, EPA\u2019s assessment was merely a \u201csnap shot\u201d in time. It\u2019s vital that EPA monitor future changes in industry practices in order to know when the time has come to again review these issues. EPA can\u2019t walk away now.<\/p>\n<p>Clearly, more work needs to be done. There are ways to reduce and minimize risks of oil and gas production, but they require a full understanding of what those risks are. EPA\u2019s report has provided only a partial understanding.<\/p>\n<p>Through a process of continual improvement, industry and governments can fill data gaps and develop the science and technologies needed to determine when and how risk reduction tools can be deployed in the most effective ways.<\/p>\n<p>At EDF, we are launching a water research agenda that will add depth and detail to this body of research. Our hope is that EPA also will help drive future efforts to fill data gaps and develop new science. Further, we hope the agency will provide better messaging and public education of what each phase of research shows and, importantly, what it doesn\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p>Rather than being a definitive assessment of the safety of oil and gas operations, EPA\u2019s report marks the beginning of a thorough and rigorous scientific examination of the industry\u2019s impact on water \u2013 an effort that will help industry and regulators understand and manage \u00a0very real threats to our water supply. EDF will do everything we can to help.<\/p>\n<p><em>Photo Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/62459458@N08\/7580640864\/in\/photolist-cxSLqy-9KtiPA-pSDDh9-oVaVa8-pRYkcn-njFC3u-dbUyhf-doft5m-dbUyaf-nzaHNo-dbUwU4-dc9wnN-dc9whw-dc9voH-fsZkUv-fteFiU-fteJKJ-fsZiVD-dbUxPD-dbUx22-dbUyrf-dbUxK4-dbUxzP-dbUxn8-dbUyjS-dbUxEX-dbUxCn-dbUyM7-dbUyFm-dbUzeW-dbUxva-dbUxUc-dbUzij-dbUynU-dbUy56-fsZnCn-fsZoqg-fsZmS2-ci6hWw-ci6ggh-ci6kcQ-ci6enw-ci6nbQ-pX6QDz-pLGwAT-p1jBsC-oQ5vzJ-pHixaN-psUMMB-pKpuia\">Flickr user Jeremy Buckingham<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One study cannot answer every question about water pollution risks from oil and gas drilling, nor should it be expected to. But as my colleague Nichole Saunders pointed out, the oft-quoted statement of EPA\u2019s water study \u2013 that it found no evidence of \u201cwidespread, systemic impacts on drinking water sources\u201d\u2013 implied to some that activities &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":167,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[693],"tags":[100168],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-11080","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-natural-gas","tag-produced-water"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>EPA&#039;s Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start - Energy Exchange<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"EPA&#039;s Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start - Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"One study cannot answer every question about water pollution risks from oil and gas drilling, nor should it be expected to. But as my colleague Nichole Saunders pointed out, the oft-quoted statement of EPA\u2019s water study \u2013 that it found no evidence of \u201cwidespread, systemic impacts on drinking water sources\u201d\u2013 implied to some that activities ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Energy Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-09-11T16:16:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-01T21:53:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Scott Anderson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Scott Anderson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Scott Anderson\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7146067f0b02c444be155074dd80ae16\"},\"headline\":\"EPA&#8217;s Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-09-11T16:16:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-01T21:53:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":727,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"produced water\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Natural Gas\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/\",\"name\":\"EPA's Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start - Energy Exchange\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-09-11T16:16:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-01T21:53:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7146067f0b02c444be155074dd80ae16\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/38\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/11\\\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"EPA&#8217;s Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Energy Exchange\",\"description\":\"Accelerating the clean energy revolution\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7146067f0b02c444be155074dd80ae16\",\"name\":\"Scott Anderson\",\"description\":\"Scott serves as EDF\u2019s point person on policies relating to the land and water impacts of oil and natural gas development and to the geological sequestration of carbon dioxide.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.edf.org\\\/people\\\/scott-anderson\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/energyexchange\\\/author\\\/sanderson\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"EPA's Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start - Energy Exchange","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"EPA's Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start - Energy Exchange","og_description":"One study cannot answer every question about water pollution risks from oil and gas drilling, nor should it be expected to. But as my colleague Nichole Saunders pointed out, the oft-quoted statement of EPA\u2019s water study \u2013 that it found no evidence of \u201cwidespread, systemic impacts on drinking water sources\u201d\u2013 implied to some that activities ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/","og_site_name":"Energy Exchange","article_published_time":"2015-09-11T16:16:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-01T21:53:17+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Scott Anderson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Scott Anderson","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/"},"author":{"name":"Scott Anderson","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/7146067f0b02c444be155074dd80ae16"},"headline":"EPA&#8217;s Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start","datePublished":"2015-09-11T16:16:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-01T21:53:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/"},"wordCount":727,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg","keywords":["produced water"],"articleSection":["Natural Gas"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/","name":"EPA's Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start - Energy Exchange","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg","datePublished":"2015-09-11T16:16:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-01T21:53:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/7146067f0b02c444be155074dd80ae16"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/38\/files\/2015\/09\/7580640864_0e9392584b_z-300x200.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/2015\/09\/11\/epas-water-report-a-good-but-incomplete-start\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"EPA&#8217;s Water Report: A Good but Incomplete Start"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/","name":"Energy Exchange","description":"Accelerating the clean energy revolution","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/#\/schema\/person\/7146067f0b02c444be155074dd80ae16","name":"Scott Anderson","description":"Scott serves as EDF\u2019s point person on policies relating to the land and water impacts of oil and natural gas development and to the geological sequestration of carbon dioxide.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.edf.org\/people\/scott-anderson"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/author\/sanderson\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11080","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11080"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11080\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11080"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11080"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11080"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/energyexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=11080"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}