{"id":7033,"date":"2017-12-12T14:34:48","date_gmt":"2017-12-12T18:34:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/?p=7033"},"modified":"2018-01-03T11:26:44","modified_gmt":"2018-01-03T15:26:44","slug":"heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/","title":{"rendered":"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-7034\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" height=\"332\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-300x184.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-768x472.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic.jpg 1087w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Update: The bills outlined in this blog were passed by the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources on December 13, 2017. You can read EDF\u2019s full statement <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edf.org\/media\/bills-weaken-us-fishing-law-advance-congress-despite-broad-opposition\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In an intensely polarized age, fishery issues have been among the few to stay above the partisan fray on Capitol Hill.\u00a0 Historically, amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA) have proceeded on a virtually consensus basis, with the 2007 reauthorization passing the Senate without a single \u201cno\u201d vote and other relatively minor changes to the law, such as the recent decision to shift management of Dungeness crab to the State of Washington, proceeding with bipartisan support.\u00a0 In taking this approach, lawmakers are following the lead of user groups, which often overcome legitimate differences on how to approach key issues at the local and regional level. In the past these solutions have followed an overall strategy of science-based management that has sharply reduced overfishing in the United States, fueled the recovery of dozens of depleted species, and enabled higher fishing quotas from the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of Alaska.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>But it is highly likely that the House Natural Resources Committee will depart from this tradition tomorrow and approve H.R. 200 (MSA reauthorization) and H.R. 3588 (red snapper) on a largely party line vote. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edf.org\/media\/leading-chefs-across-united-states-unite-send-message-congress\">Fishing groups, chefs<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2017\/oct\/23\/200-scientists-send-letter-defending-fisheries-man\/\">scientists<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edf.org\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/12-12-17%20NGO%20Letter%20to%20Chairman%20Bishop%20Bipartisan%20MSA_1.pdf\">others<\/a> have voiced their concerns about these bills. Many groups, members and staff have worked hard to try to find a middle ground, but the bills as currently drafted lack any meaningful bipartisan support. They also threaten to create significant problems for marine fishes and the fishermen who depend on them.\u00a0 Here\u2019s how.<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>MSA Reauthorization, H.R. 200<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Exempting key fisheries from annual catch limits: <\/strong>As explained in a <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/04\/27\/theres-nothing-modern-about-overfishing\/\">previous blog<\/a>, legal requirements to prevent overfishing truly took hold only after implementation of annual catch limits (ACLs) in virtually all fisheries.\u00a0 That progress resulted in part from limits, sometimes for the first time, on how many fish recreational anglers could catch &#8211; limits that had already applied to commercial fishermen for years.\u00a0 H.R. 200 would exempt a significant, and unclear, number of fisheries from this important requirement, including an indeterminate number of species that are targeted by some fishermen.\u00a0 The North Pacific Fishery Management Council, among others, has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npfmc.org\/wp-content\/PDFdocuments\/CM\/2017\/101817\/10Oct_SullivanLegislativeLtr.pdf\">raised concerns about this approach<\/a>, and we agree.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Eliminating rebuilding deadlines<\/strong>: The longer a fish population (or \u201cstock\u201d) stays overfished or in a rebuilding plan, the longer it stays at risk for declines. \u00a0The stock is less resilient and things like negative environmental effects or declines in the numbers of young fish cause much larger problems.\u00a0 H.R. 200 creates so many exemptions from the current rebuilding requirements that it would effectively eliminate most rebuilding deadlines. The result could well be short term increases in quotas, but in the long-term it will likely lead to declines that will bring hardship to fishermen and coastal communities.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Putting management tools off-limits<\/strong>: One underlying strength of MSA management is the primacy of the regional councils, which must use input from local user groups to form regulations that can only be rejected by federal regulators if they are illegal (not just different from what the feds would prefer).\u00a0 H.R. 200 would impose a moratorium on a form of management known as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edf.org\/oceans\/how-catch-shares-work-promising-solution\">catch shares<\/a> for at least a year while a redundant study is conducted. \u00a0The bill would also dictate how councils could proceed with catch shares even after their authority to do so is restored, requiring a vote that includes non-active fishermen who could hold up a change in management that user groups want.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Preventing innovation<\/strong>: Scientists, fishermen, and others use pilot programs under so-called exempted fishing permits to try out new gears, new data collection methods, and other innovations, but H.R. 200\u2019s review provisions would hamstring regional councils\u2019 ability to move forward with these pilot programs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong><u>Red Snapper Management, H.R. 3588<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Red snapper is one of the most popular species in the Gulf of Mexico, prized by anglers and commercial fishermen alike.\u00a0 Currently managed in federal waters by the National Marine Fisheries Service, private anglers have expressed interest in having their portion of the fishery managed by state fish and wildlife agencies even in federal waters, and H.R. 3588 would make that change.\u00a0 Although proponents of the bill assert that science-based quotas would continue to apply if management is transferred, the bill gives the states unfettered discretion in setting fishing season lengths without linking them back to those quotas, with only actual takeover of all fishing (including state waters) by the Secretary as a backstop.\u00a0 Long before the Secretary takes the \u201cnuclear option\u201d of federal takeover, overly long seasons could quickly deplete the red snapper population to the detriment of all user groups.<\/p>\n<p>The sponsors of H.R. 200 and 3588 likely have the votes to get these bills out of committee, but in proceeding without finding middle ground, the victory may be short-lived. Without broad support, these new provisions are unlikely to advance or work as intended. The best way to deal with fisheries challenges, today as in the past, is to grapple with the in-the-water implications of the bills and achieve as much consensus as possible.\u00a0 We look forward to continuing to work toward that goal as the process moves forward.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Update: The bills outlined in this blog were passed by the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources on December 13, 2017. You can read EDF\u2019s full statement here. In an intensely polarized age, fishery issues have been among the few to stay above the partisan fray on Capitol Hill.\u00a0 Historically, amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Act &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6135,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[263,44,378],"tags":[328,55583,102863],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-7033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gulf-of-mexico","category-policy","category-seafood","tag-congress","tag-domestic","tag-us-policy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support - EDFish<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support - EDFish\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Update: The bills outlined in this blog were passed by the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources on December 13, 2017. You can read EDF\u2019s full statement here. In an intensely polarized age, fishery issues have been among the few to stay above the partisan fray on Capitol Hill.\u00a0 Historically, amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Act ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"EDFish\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-12-12T18:34:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-03T15:26:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Monica Goldberg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Monica Goldberg\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Monica Goldberg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ad241fca33312b8e9d0a383bcee8b1d3\"},\"headline\":\"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-12-12T18:34:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-03T15:26:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":880,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Congress\",\"Domestic\",\"US policy\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Gulf of Mexico\",\"Policy\",\"Seafood\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/\",\"name\":\"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support - EDFish\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-12-12T18:34:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-03T15:26:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ad241fca33312b8e9d0a383bcee8b1d3\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/12\\\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/\",\"name\":\"EDFish\",\"description\":\"Innovating for healthy oceans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ad241fca33312b8e9d0a383bcee8b1d3\",\"name\":\"Monica Goldberg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/author\\\/mgoldberg\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support - EDFish","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support - EDFish","og_description":"Update: The bills outlined in this blog were passed by the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources on December 13, 2017. You can read EDF\u2019s full statement here. In an intensely polarized age, fishery issues have been among the few to stay above the partisan fray on Capitol Hill.\u00a0 Historically, amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Act ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/","og_site_name":"EDFish","article_published_time":"2017-12-12T18:34:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-03T15:26:44+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Monica Goldberg","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Monica Goldberg","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/"},"author":{"name":"Monica Goldberg","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#\/schema\/person\/ad241fca33312b8e9d0a383bcee8b1d3"},"headline":"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support","datePublished":"2017-12-12T18:34:48+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-03T15:26:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/"},"wordCount":880,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg","keywords":["Congress","Domestic","US policy"],"articleSection":["Gulf of Mexico","Policy","Seafood"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/","name":"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support - EDFish","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg","datePublished":"2017-12-12T18:34:48+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-03T15:26:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#\/schema\/person\/ad241fca33312b8e9d0a383bcee8b1d3"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2017\/12\/blog-pic-1024x629.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2017\/12\/12\/heres-why-new-fishing-legislation-lacks-broad-support\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Here\u2019s why new fishing legislation lacks broad support"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/","name":"EDFish","description":"Innovating for healthy oceans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#\/schema\/person\/ad241fca33312b8e9d0a383bcee8b1d3","name":"Monica Goldberg","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/author\/mgoldberg\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6135"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7033"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7033\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7033"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=7033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}