{"id":4568,"date":"2013-02-25T16:28:04","date_gmt":"2013-02-25T20:28:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/?p=4568"},"modified":"2014-10-10T14:48:33","modified_gmt":"2014-10-10T18:48:33","slug":"fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/","title":{"rendered":"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
photo credit: wanderlasss<\/a> via photopin<\/a> cc<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

To paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald, the test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to entertain two opposed ideas at the same time and still function.<\/p>\n

Two views on the importance of catch data for estimating the abundance of fish populations are portrayed as opposing ideas in recent articles<\/a>, but both of the \u201cantagonists\u201d display first rate intelligence by coming to the same conclusion: catch data send an important signal about the status of a fish population, but other kinds of information must be applied to avoid being confounded by all the other things that affect catch and come to a reasonably accurate estimate of fish abundance.<\/strong><\/p>\n

This argument over methodology may seem arcane, but the stakes are high: estimates of the status of global fisheries based on catch data, which are available for most fisheries, suggest they are in pretty poor shape, because catches have declined sharply in many of them.\u00a0 But when one looks at stocks that have been assessed by scientists who take into account fishery-independent measures of abundance, the situation looks far less dire, because decreases in catch can result not only from decreased abundance, but also from changes in markets, environmental conditions, regulations, and even in what fish are called \u2013 Hilborn and Branch point out that in the 50\u2019s, all sharks were put into only 7 categories, but now there are 36 groups for which catch data are collected, so that reduced catch in some of the earlier categories may merely be the result of re-classification.<\/p>\n

So catch data provide a satellite-eye view of the whole world that is out of focus, while stock assessments provide really sharp images of your town.\u00a0 Which is the more accurate depiction of reality? \u00a0Neither, of course.\u00a0 These two perspectives must be intelligently synthesized to find reality.<\/p>\n

One way to do this synthesis may be to consider the factors that can affect catch, and therefore its usefulness as a proxy for fish abundance, one at a time, so that we can systematically extract more information from catch data.\u00a0 It seems as though the effects of changes in fish names could be easily addressed by reconstructing the original categories \u2013 for example, lumping the 36 current categories into the original 7 to see if catch actually did decline.\u00a0 The effects of regulations only apply to fisheries that are regulated, obviously \u2013 and these happen to be the fisheries most likely to be assessed scientifically.\u00a0 The major gap in our understanding of fish stock status is in unregulated fisheries, where changes in regulations are probably not affecting catch very much.\u00a0\u00a0 The effects of markets on catch could be analyzed at least in a sample of fisheries covering a range of fishery archetypes \u2013 for example, industrial commodity fisheries, small scale fisheries with aggregated catch for export, small scale fisheries that sell to domestic or regional markets, etc. \u2013 by looking for correlations between ex-vessel prices paid to fishermen and catch.\u00a0 Same thing for the effects of fishing costs.<\/p>\n

Instead of expending energy arguing about the merits or de-merits of using catch data to estimate fish stock status, maybe both camps should engage in a collaborative research project aimed at quantifying the effects of the many factors that affect catch so that catch data \u2013 the only data that are available for the majority of the world\u2019s fisheries at the moment \u2013 can provide a more accurate picture of global fisheries status.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\nphoto credit: wanderlasss via photopin cc
\nTo paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald, the test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to entertain two opposed ideas at the same time and still function.<\/p>\n

Two views on the importance of catch data for estimating the abundance of fish populations are portrayed as opposing ideas in recent articles, but both of the \u201cantagonists\u201d display first rate intelligence by coming to the same conclusion: catch data send an important signal about the status of a fish population, but other kinds of information must be applied to avoid being confounded by all the other things that affect catch and come to a reasonably accurate estimate of fish abundance.<\/p>\n

This argument over methodology may seem arcane, but the stakes are high: estimates of the status of global fisheries based on catch data, which are available for most fisheries, suggest they are in pretty poor shape, because catches have declined sharply in many of them. But when one looks at stocks that have been assessed by scientists who take into account fishery-independent measures of abundance, the situation looks far less dire, because decreases in catch can result not only from decreased abundance, but also from changes in markets, environmental conditions, regulations, and even in what fish are called \u2013 Hilborn and Branch point out that in the 50\u2019s, all sharks were put into only 7 categories, but now there are 36 groups for which catch data are collected, so that reduced catch in some of the earlier categories may merely be the result of re-classification.<\/p>\n

Read the full post »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":505,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42656],"tags":[149,42657,42659,572,80,70,42],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-4568","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-scienceresearch","tag-biomass","tag-catch-data","tag-discourse","tag-fish","tag-fisheries","tag-research","tag-science"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nFisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches - EDFish<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches - EDFish\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"photo credit: wanderlasss via photopin cc To paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald, the test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to entertain two opposed ideas at the same time and still function. Two views on the importance of catch data for estimating the abundance of fish populations are portrayed as opposing ideas in recent articles, but both of the \u201cantagonists\u201d display first rate intelligence by coming to the same conclusion: catch data send an important signal about the status of a fish population, but other kinds of information must be applied to avoid being confounded by all the other things that affect catch and come to a reasonably accurate estimate of fish abundance. This argument over methodology may seem arcane, but the stakes are high: estimates of the status of global fisheries based on catch data, which are available for most fisheries, suggest they are in pretty poor shape, because catches have declined sharply in many of them. But when one looks at stocks that have been assessed by scientists who take into account fishery-independent measures of abundance, the situation looks far less dire, because decreases in catch can result not only from decreased abundance, but also from changes in markets, environmental conditions, regulations, and even in what fish are called \u2013 Hilborn and Branch point out that in the 50\u2019s, all sharks were put into only 7 categories, but now there are 36 groups for which catch data are collected, so that reduced catch in some of the earlier categories may merely be the result of re-classification. Read the full post »\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"EDFish\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-02-25T20:28:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-10T18:48:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2013\/02\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rod Fujita\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rod Fujita\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Rod Fujita\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/dd647cf8b72422e79b97aca4546e36a2\"},\"headline\":\"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-02-25T20:28:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-10T18:48:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":583,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"biomass\",\"catch data\",\"discourse\",\"Fish\",\"Fisheries\",\"research\",\"science\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Science\\\/Research\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/\",\"name\":\"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches - EDFish\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-02-25T20:28:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-10T18:48:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/dd647cf8b72422e79b97aca4546e36a2\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2013\\\/02\\\/25\\\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/\",\"name\":\"EDFish\",\"description\":\"Innovating for healthy oceans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/dd647cf8b72422e79b97aca4546e36a2\",\"name\":\"Rod Fujita\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.edf.org\\\/page.cfm?tagID=917\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/author\\\/rfujita\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches - EDFish","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches - EDFish","og_description":"photo credit: wanderlasss via photopin cc To paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald, the test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to entertain two opposed ideas at the same time and still function. Two views on the importance of catch data for estimating the abundance of fish populations are portrayed as opposing ideas in recent articles, but both of the \u201cantagonists\u201d display first rate intelligence by coming to the same conclusion: catch data send an important signal about the status of a fish population, but other kinds of information must be applied to avoid being confounded by all the other things that affect catch and come to a reasonably accurate estimate of fish abundance. This argument over methodology may seem arcane, but the stakes are high: estimates of the status of global fisheries based on catch data, which are available for most fisheries, suggest they are in pretty poor shape, because catches have declined sharply in many of them. But when one looks at stocks that have been assessed by scientists who take into account fishery-independent measures of abundance, the situation looks far less dire, because decreases in catch can result not only from decreased abundance, but also from changes in markets, environmental conditions, regulations, and even in what fish are called \u2013 Hilborn and Branch point out that in the 50\u2019s, all sharks were put into only 7 categories, but now there are 36 groups for which catch data are collected, so that reduced catch in some of the earlier categories may merely be the result of re-classification. Read the full post »","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/","og_site_name":"EDFish","article_published_time":"2013-02-25T20:28:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-10T18:48:33+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2013\/02\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Rod Fujita","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rod Fujita","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/"},"author":{"name":"Rod Fujita","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#\/schema\/person\/dd647cf8b72422e79b97aca4546e36a2"},"headline":"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches","datePublished":"2013-02-25T20:28:04+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-10T18:48:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/"},"wordCount":583,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2013\/02\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg","keywords":["biomass","catch data","discourse","Fish","Fisheries","research","science"],"articleSection":["Science\/Research"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/","name":"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches - EDFish","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2013\/02\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg","datePublished":"2013-02-25T20:28:04+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-10T18:48:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#\/schema\/person\/dd647cf8b72422e79b97aca4546e36a2"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2013\/02\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2013\/02\/medium_5329285889-300x225.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2013\/02\/25\/fisheries-catch-data-a-tale-of-two-approaches\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fisheries Catch Data: A Tale of Two Approaches"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/","name":"EDFish","description":"Innovating for healthy oceans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#\/schema\/person\/dd647cf8b72422e79b97aca4546e36a2","name":"Rod Fujita","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.edf.org\/page.cfm?tagID=917"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/author\/rfujita\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4568","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/505"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4568"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4568\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4568"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4568"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4568"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4568"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}