{"id":3452,"date":"2012-04-02T16:54:45","date_gmt":"2012-04-02T20:54:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/?p=3452"},"modified":"2012-04-11T11:04:19","modified_gmt":"2012-04-11T15:04:19","slug":"charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/","title":{"rendered":"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Atlantic<\/a>
Atlantic Cod; Photo Credit: NOAA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

By now, most people concerned with fisheries management in New England, and in fact many others across the country, are aware of the difficult situation unfolding around the Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod stock.\u00a0 For those who are not, a stock assessment completed late in 2011 drastically altered our perception of the stock from the last assessment completed in 2008, and suggests that the resource is in much worse shape than we previously thought.<\/p>\n

Actually, in many ways the 2011 assessment tells a story similar to the 2008 assessment:\u00a0 Biomass reached all-time lows during the 1990s, but then approximately doubled by 2001.\u00a0 Thereafter, biomass dipped again to another low point in the mid-2000s, before climbing again toward the end of the 2000s.<\/p>\n

The critical difference between the two assessments lies in the pace of rebuilding since the recent low in the mid-2000s.\u00a0 The 2008 assessment suggested that the population was increasing extremely rapidly, with growth of more than 200% from 2005 to 2007.\u00a0\u00a0 In doing so, it had exceeded the overfishing threshold, and was well on its way toward the rebuilding target biomass that would produce the maximum sustainable yield on a continuing basis. <\/p>\n

In contrast, the 2011 assessment suggests stock growth on the order of 50% from 2006 to 2010, certainly more modest but encouraging nonetheless.\u00a0 However, the resulting biomass estimate remains below the overfishing threshold and is approximately 70% less than that estimated by the 2008 assessment.<\/p>\n

Based on the outcomes of the new assessment, the management plan would normally call for a substantial reduction in the catch limit for the 2012 fishing year commencing May 1.\u00a0 That reduction would aim to conserve a species of tremendous cultural and ecological importance, thereby allowing for the long-term persistence of the fishery. But, the reduction would also mean severe near-term impacts upon fishing communities.<\/p>\n

This unexpected outcome, the stark change from one assessment to the next, and the significant implications of potential cuts in quotas for commercial fishermen across the Gulf of Maine region led NOAA to take unusual steps in response.\u00a0 First, a task force comprised of agency staff and Council members was created to identify all available options.\u00a0 Through several workshops with managers and stakeholders and by carefully examining the law, the agency determined that it could invoke its \u201cemergency\u201d authority, which allows a catch limit to be set for one year that will reduce but not necessarily end overfishing (as the law otherwise requires).<\/p>\n

There has been widespread support for this general approach across the fisheries management community, from industry members to environmentalists to decision-makers and others, including EDF<\/a>.\u00a0 The major point of dispute has been how high the 2012 catch limit should be, with arguments ranging from 4,000 metric tons (mt) to 7,000 mt or more.<\/p>\n

Now, NOAA has proposed a catch limit<\/a><\/strong> of 6,700 mt for 2012.\u00a0 That represents a reduction of approximately 22% from 2011, a far cry from the cut of 80% or more that would be required outside of an emergency situation, but an impact on fishermen nonetheless.\u00a0 At the same time, the interim catch limit undoubtedly represents a substantial risk of further stock depletion if the 2011 assessment is accurate.\u00a0 So, why should we move forward knowingly taking such a risk?<\/p>\n

First, the stock can probably weather that harvest for one more year to buy us more time to improve our understanding of the resource, and map out a response to a situation no one saw coming.\u00a0 Indeed, the stock has withstood harvests in the range of 5,000-11,000 mt for the past decade without persistent decline, so we believe one more year in that range won\u2019t lead to outright collapse.<\/p>\n

Still, we should make no mistake that harvest of that magnitude now looks like much more of a gamble, and we cannot in good conscience maintain that level of catch much longer unless we learn that the resource in is better shape than estimated by the 2011 assessment.<\/p>\n

So, like any risk, whether this one is worth taking depends upon what rewards we stand to gain.\u00a0 Avoiding widespread socio-economic impacts is one reward, but that reward might be only for the single year provided by the emergency provision.\u00a0 Whether we are merely delaying the pain, or whether we can avoid or at least minimize it, will be largely determined by what else we do with the time we have bought.<\/p>\n

Tomorrow, I will outline two major goals we should aim to accomplish in the year ahead to most effectively utilize the time at hand and more confidently and effectively manage the Gulf of Maine cod fishery.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

By now, most people concerned with fisheries management in New England, and in fact many others across the country, are aware of the difficult situation unfolding around the Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod stock. For those who are not, a stock assessment completed late in 2011 drastically altered our perception of the stock from the last assessment completed in 2008, and suggests that the resource is in much worse shape than we previously thought.<\/p>\n

Read the full post »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1993,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[172],"tags":[686,517,649,72530],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-new-england","tag-cod","tag-fishery-management","tag-gulf-of-maine","tag-new-england"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nCharting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I - EDFish<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I - EDFish\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By now, most people concerned with fisheries management in New England, and in fact many others across the country, are aware of the difficult situation unfolding around the Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod stock. For those who are not, a stock assessment completed late in 2011 drastically altered our perception of the stock from the last assessment completed in 2008, and suggests that the resource is in much worse shape than we previously thought. Read the full post »\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"EDFish\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-04-02T20:54:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-04-11T15:04:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2012\/04\/resizedcod.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jake Kritzer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jake Kritzer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jake Kritzer\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c068b7939f8dcc65219105cd941e47d7\"},\"headline\":\"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-04-02T20:54:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-04-11T15:04:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":764,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/resizedcod.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Cod\",\"Fishery Management\",\"Gulf of Maine\",\"New England\"],\"articleSection\":[\"New England\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/\",\"name\":\"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I - EDFish\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/resizedcod.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-04-02T20:54:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-04-11T15:04:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c068b7939f8dcc65219105cd941e47d7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/resizedcod.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/wp-content\\\/blogs.dir\\\/18\\\/files\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/resizedcod.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/2012\\\/04\\\/02\\\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/\",\"name\":\"EDFish\",\"description\":\"Innovating for healthy oceans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c068b7939f8dcc65219105cd941e47d7\",\"name\":\"Jake Kritzer\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.edf.org\\\/page.cfm?tagID=867\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/edfish\\\/author\\\/jkritzer\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I - EDFish","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I - EDFish","og_description":"By now, most people concerned with fisheries management in New England, and in fact many others across the country, are aware of the difficult situation unfolding around the Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod stock. For those who are not, a stock assessment completed late in 2011 drastically altered our perception of the stock from the last assessment completed in 2008, and suggests that the resource is in much worse shape than we previously thought. Read the full post »","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/","og_site_name":"EDFish","article_published_time":"2012-04-02T20:54:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-04-11T15:04:19+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2012\/04\/resizedcod.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Jake Kritzer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jake Kritzer","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/"},"author":{"name":"Jake Kritzer","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#\/schema\/person\/c068b7939f8dcc65219105cd941e47d7"},"headline":"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I","datePublished":"2012-04-02T20:54:45+00:00","dateModified":"2012-04-11T15:04:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/"},"wordCount":764,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2012\/04\/resizedcod.jpg","keywords":["Cod","Fishery Management","Gulf of Maine","New England"],"articleSection":["New England"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/","name":"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I - EDFish","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2012\/04\/resizedcod.jpg","datePublished":"2012-04-02T20:54:45+00:00","dateModified":"2012-04-11T15:04:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#\/schema\/person\/c068b7939f8dcc65219105cd941e47d7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2012\/04\/resizedcod.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/18\/files\/2012\/04\/resizedcod.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/2012\/04\/02\/charting-a-course-for-gulf-of-maine-cod-part-i\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Charting a Course for Gulf of Maine Cod: Part I"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/","name":"EDFish","description":"Innovating for healthy oceans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/#\/schema\/person\/c068b7939f8dcc65219105cd941e47d7","name":"Jake Kritzer","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.edf.org\/page.cfm?tagID=867"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/author\/jkritzer\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1993"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3452"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3452\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3452"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/edfish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}