EDFish

Selected tag(s): New England

Offshore Boats Thriving Under New Catch Share Rules in New England; Regional Landings Up 4 Percent 1st Week

Encouraging news from John Sackton at SeafoodNews.com on the implementation of sectors in New England:

New England fishermen offload

New England fishermen offload

SEAFOOD.COM NEWS by John Sackton – May 11, 2010 – Catch shares have come to New England as of May 1st, and contrary to reports of disaster, landings overall are up across the region.

In the first week of May last year (2009), total landings were 981,000 lbs. This year, landings the first week of May totaled 1,020,000 lbs., an increase of 4%, according to the NMFS weekly New England landing summaries. These figures were calculated by comparing the NMFS Weekly Auction report year to date totals for the week ending April 30th, 2010, and May 7th, 2010.

By using the change in the year to date figures for this single week, it is possible to get NMFS’ figures for landings through the Auction for this week in 2009 and the same week in 2010. Both Gloucester and New Bedford saw higher landings in 2010. For Gloucester, 331,000 lbs of fish went through the auction, vs. 249,000 for the same week in 2009. For New Bedford, 689,000 lbs. went through the auction this year, vs. 490,000 for the same week last year. In percentage terms, Gloucester is up 33%, and New Bedford is up 40.6%. The reason that the regional totals are not higher is that in 2009, there were landings recorded for one day in Boston, but in 2010, no landings were made this week in Boston.

So, whatever else is happening in New England, the fleet is landing more fish. Also, reports from boat owners and the auctions show some spectacular results. For example, Carlos Rafael, the largest fleet owner in New England, runs 29 groundfish boats out of New Bedford.

New Bedford Fisherman

New Bedford Fisherman

Last week, he was crying crocodile tears, saying “I don’t have enough fish” to the New Bedford Standard Times. Actually, Carlos has landing rights to about 12.28 million lbs. of fish, about 9% of the total New England landings. Most of his fleet is believed to be in the Northeast Sector 9, managed by his daughter, which has allocations of 13.8 million lbs, while additional quota could also be in the Northeast sectors 7 and 8, which also have other boats from New Bedford.

What happened to Carlos during the first week of the program: he landed the highest grossing groundfish trip ever in New Bedford. One of his vessels came in with a gross stock of over $179,000 for one trip. The boat landed haddock, cod, yellowtail, dabs, blackback etc., and because the vessel could keep everything it caught of legal size, the efficiency of the vessel skyrocketed.

It is true that at that rate, Carlos may not need all of his 29 vessels, but on the other hand, his business will be much more profitable this year, as he can determine whether to quickly catch his quota in a few months, or to spread out his trips. But in any case, each trip he is now landing under the new system will be bigger and more profitable than under the old system of trip limits and discards.

Read More »

Posted in New England / Also tagged , , | Read 5 Responses

Another Year of Operation Approved for RI Fluke Sector Program

Emilie Litsinger, EDF Oceans NE Groundfish Project Manager

Emilie Litsinger, EDF Oceans NE Groundfish Project Manager

This week marks another historical step towards achieving sustainable fisheries management in New England.  The Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) just approved another year of operation for the Rhode Island Fluke Sector Program.  The approval of this year’s program was contingent on the results from the pilot sector last year.  

DEM presented the results of the 2009 program at a Roundtable meeting in mid-February.  The results from the 2009 program were very positive, showing benefits to the resource as well as the fishermen.  In fact, the pilot program participants discarded some 98% less fluke than non-participants and were also subject to higher monitoring coverage. 

The program’s proven ability to reduce regulatory discards will ultimately lead to an increase in the State of Rhode Island’s quota, benefitting the entire fishery.  The results also showed the program’s proven capacity to provide accurate data that facilitates a sound, scientifically based approach to the continuing analysis of sector allocation as a potential strategy for improving the management of fluke. 

The sector participants reported that their participation in the program resulted in enhanced economic efficiencies, an improved ability to make sound and safe business decisions, a cooperative and collaborative orientation among fellow participants, and a heightened sense of well-being and job satisfaction.  The University of Rhode Island also conducted an economic analysis on the performance of the sector in 2009.  Their preliminary results showed that not only did the sector participants benefit economically from the program, but the non-sector members benefitted positively as well. 

We applaud DEM for continuing to support this worthwhile program and are certain that the results from this year’s program will continue to show positive benefits to both the resource and the fishermen.

Posted in New England / Also tagged , , , | Comments are closed

Alaska Bering Sea Crabber Provides Insight and Lessons Learned from the Alaskan Crab Catch Share Program

As New England’s groundfish fishery prepares to move to cooperative-based catch share management later this week, Jim Stone from the Alaska Bering Sea Crabbers provides insight and lessons learned from the Alaskan crab catch share program.  In a column in the Juneau Empire, Jim, a 32-year fisherman, highlights the safety benefits, increased catch, and better jobs that have accompanied catch share management in Alaska’s crab fishery.

Posted in New England, Pacific / Also tagged , , , , , | Comments are closed

An Interview with Julie Wormser, New England and Mid-Atlantic Regional Director for EDF’s Oceans Program

EDF’s Oceans program team is comprised of knowledgeable people with a wide range of experience in fisheries, marine sciences and oceans policy. In continuing with our spotlight on EDF’s passionate and talented Oceans staff, we invite you to learn a little more about our New England and Mid-Atlantic Regional Director, Julie Wormser.

Julie Wormser, New England & Mid-Atlantic Regional Director for EDF Oceans program.

Julie Wormser, New England & Mid-Atlantic Regional Director for EDF Oceans program.

Where are you from?

 I was born in Salem and have lived in Massachusetts all but a few years of my life. I grew up three blocks from the ocean in Marblehead and as a kid played among the now-gone fishing shacks near Fort Sewall.  I grew up with two brothers and multiple official and unofficial foster kids my parents took in to live with us. My mom was kind of a freelance social worker before she finally became one for real when I was in high school.

What did you study in college?

I started out studying forestry and agriculture at Sterling College in northern Vermont.  I finished up my bachelor’s degree in biology at Swarthmore College.  Just a few years ago I went back to school to get a Masters in Public Administration at the Kennedy School of Government.

What do you do at Environmental Defense Fund?

I manage the Oceans program for the New England and Mid-Atlantic regions. I lead a team of tremendously talented, thoughtful people with backgrounds in marine biology, public policy, law, business and communications. The team is focused on making sure catch shares are designed and set up well. We work predominantly with New England fishermen and fishery managers to find out what goals are most important to them. We organize fishermen’s exchanges with colleagues in other regions so they can work with their peers on identifying successful policy options to achieve their goals.

EDF studies the nearly three hundred catch shares currently in operation worldwide and works to bring those lessons learned back to New England. For example, we are supporting efforts by the New England Fishery Management Council to protect small-scale fishermen and smaller ports by placing accumulation caps on groundfish species to limit the amount of quota any individual can hold.  We’d also like to see more explicit ownership requirements put on quota so that the benefits of the catch shares stay within New England fishing communities.

What is something you’ve done at EDF that you are really proud of?

It’s a really tough time for many groundfish fishermen in New England right now. Half the fleet has gone under since the late 1990s under current regulations.  Now, just as fishermen are working to learn how to fish under a new catch share system called “sectors,” the amount of fish they are allowed to catch is being reduced significantly.

My team spends most of our time working to reduce costs and improve revenues for New England fishermen who are transitioning to catch shares.  We have been helping some groundfish sectors with business planning to improve their bottom lines during the next few years while annual catch limits are low.  We also spend a lot of time in Washington lobbying for federal funding to cover the costs of transitioning to catch shares.  The Obama Administration’s budget for 2011 contains nearly $23 million for the New England groundfish industry; we want to make sure that funding makes it all the way through the federal budget process so that it can directly support fishermen’s jobs next year as they navigate the transition to sectors.

If catch shares are so effective, then why is there controversy surrounding their implementation?

The truth is that fishermen, managers and non-profit conservation groups agree on a lot more than you would think. You have to compare catch shares to the alternatives.  The current system of days-at-sea and daily trip limits in New England has been a failure.  Other regions have more often used hard catch limits without allocations; this invariably leads to dangerous, wasteful derby fisheries.  We have decades of experience with alternatives to catch shares:  more closures, more fluctuations in harvest levels, lower trip limits, more bycatch and ultimately fewer jobs.

Any management system needs to be designed well and catch shares are no different.    Groundfishermen and agency staff have worked incredibly hard over the last year to get sectors ready to go on May 1st.  Everyone recognizes that there’s more work to do to improve the system once it’s up and running.  But we’ve checked in repeatedly with sector managers over the last year and hear again and again that they’d rather keep moving forward under sectors than have to continue to fish under days-at-sea another year.

Aren’t there already catch shares in New England?

Although groundfish sectors are by far getting the most attention and resources, approximately five percent of the sea scallop industry just started fishing under a catch share as of March 1st.  Groundfish sectors arose out of a smaller industry initiative in Cape Cod that was approved in 2003. 

Over the last few years, the number of state and federal fisheries moving to catch shares has significantly increased.  Rhode Island, for example, adopted a pilot sector for summer flounder that started operating in 2009.  The results were excellent—the sector stayed under their total allowable catch, they spent less and made more than they had for the same harvest in past years, and they had almost no bycatch and remained fishing throughout the year while the rest of the fleet had considerably higher bycatch and was shut down in the summer. 

This year twice the number of fishermen petitioned the state to be included in the summer flounder sector as last year.  One Rhode Island fisherman remarked on how fun it was to fish because he finally got to use his knowledge and skills to sometimes-avoid, sometimes-target summer flounder depending on his own business strategy: “It put a spring back in my step.”

What’s something that piques people’s interest when they hear it about you?

I have a twin brother who is nearly a foot taller than I am.  My mother’s family has lived in New England for almost 400 years.  I don’t have any depth perception; I regularly accidentally bump into my poor husband and daughter.

Posted in New England / Also tagged , , | Comments are closed

Seafood.com Editor and Publisher John Sackton: Time to Clean Up Hypocrisy and Mis-information in Catch Share Debate

Time to Clean up Hypocrisy and Mis-information in Catch Share debate
As originally printed on SEAFOODNEWS.COM by John Sackton – Dec 3, 2009.
Reprinted with permission.

Two editorials we print today against catch shares contain enough mis-information and hypocrisy that we felt compelled to set the record straight. Reading the Food and Water Watch editorial in the Portland Press Herald, or the editorial again slamming NMFS in today’s Gloucester Daily Times, you would think a conflagration is burning in New England against catch shares.

Nothing could be farther from the truth. The biggest issue causing consternation in the industry in New England is not catch shares, but whether blind adherence to bureaucratic procedures will doom the success of catch shares. About 97% of the fleet has signed on to sector programs, and they are focused on making them work.

Here is our attempt to set the record straight:

Huge errors in NMFS data

There have been repeated stories about how many errors exist in the NMFS catch history database, so that many boats are fishing on incorrect history, and have no opportunity to correct them until 2011. At the recent Council meeting, Pat Kurkul, NMFS regional administrator, said that out of 1480 eligible histories, only 66 have been challenged. This is far fewer than NMFS expected. As a result, they are able to have individual discussions with each person challenging their history.

On the other hand, if you don’t own the permit yourself, there is no way to challenge the history, so if you had been leasing a permit, it is the owner of the permit who is responsible for making any challenge. Therefore it is quite likely that there are additional vessels using leased permits where the lease holder thinks the history is inaccurate, but the owner either does not have the records or has left the fishery, and will not challenge the allocation. But in either case, the number of errors and challenges is not nearly as large as some would want you to believe. Read More »

Posted in New England / Also tagged , | Read 1 Response

Fishermen Voices: Dave Preble – Narragansett, Rhode Island

This clip is from a fall 2008 interview with Dave Preble, a 45-year commercial and charter boat fisherman currently serving on the New England Fishery Management Council. Dave describes both the pressure on a fishery and fishermen, and the safety concerns associated with current fishing regulations that trigger a “race to fish.”  Under “sector” catch shares management, New England groundfishermen have begun developing business strategies to maximize the benefits of harvesting specified allocations of fish when they choose rather than competing with other fishermen for a scarce resource.

Posted in New England / Also tagged , , | Comments are closed