{"id":630,"date":"2008-09-11T11:24:06","date_gmt":"2008-09-11T16:24:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/"},"modified":"2026-03-13T15:06:50","modified_gmt":"2026-03-13T20:06:50","slug":"anwr_oil_drilling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Drilling in Alaska&#8217;s ANWR Is a Bad Idea"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>U.S. oil companies <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/leading-the-news\/pelosi-drilling-in-protected-areas-a-hoax-2008-07-10.html\">already have permission to drill in millions of unexplored acres<\/a>, but there is a push now to drill in one area where they don&#8217;t have permission: the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). A terrible idea, drilling in ANWR would:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Not produce much oil.<\/li>\n<li>Not lower gas prices.<\/li>\n<li>Harm the environment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you (or someone you know) does not believe this, read on!<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<h3>Drilling Cannot Produce Enough Oil<\/h3>\n<p>A recent U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) assessment says there is &#8220;considerable uncertainty regarding both the size and quality of the oil resources that exist in ANWR.&#8221; Even if 7.7 billion barrels a day could be recovered (as <a href=\"http:\/\/pubs.usgs.gov\/fs\/fs-0028-01\/fs-0028-01.htm\">estimated in one government study<\/a>), &#8220;the current upper limit to ANWR oil production is the transportation capacity of TAPS&#8221; (Trans Alaska Pipeline System), or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alyeska-pipe.com\/PipelineFacts\/PipelineOperations.html\">2.136 million barrels per day<\/a>. To put this in context, the U.S. burns <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eia.doe.gov\/basics\/quickoil.html\">21 million barrels per day<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Plus, DOE says that the <b>maximum potential capacity &#8211; accessing all the oil that&#8217;s available to be pumped &#8211; would not be realized until 2026<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p>ANWR oil would be too little <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2007\/10\/19\/urgency_of_action\/\">too late<\/a>. Our planning for 2026 should not be centered around oil, but rather on new energy technologies. As Thomas Friedman said in a recent interview, we should be shouting &#8220;Invent, invent, invent!&#8221; not &#8220;Drill, drill, drill!&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m actually not against drilling. What I&#8217;m against is making that the center of our focus because we are on the eve of a new revolution, the energy technology revolution. It would be, Tom, as if on the eve of the IT revolution, the revolution of PCs and the internet, someone was up there standing and demanding, &#8220;IBM Selectric typewriters, IBM Selectric typewriters.&#8221; That&#8217;s what &#8220;drill, drill, drill&#8221; is the equivalent of today.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h3>It Would Not Lower Oil Prices<\/h3>\n<p>EDF economist Gernot Wagner explained to me why drilling won&#8217;t lead to lower oil and gas prices. What&#8217;s mainly driving high oil prices today, he said, is increased demand. And the increase, in large part, is due to the newly mobile millions around the world who&#8217;ve been lifted out of poverty in the last few decades.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.eia.doe.gov\/oiaf\/aeo\/otheranalysis\/ongr.html\">DOE predicts<\/a> that world oil demand between 2010 and 2015 will increase by over 7 percent, and 30 percent by 2030. The U.S. only has 3 percent of the world&#8217;s oil reserves, and less than one-fifth of that is in federal offshore waters. So even if we were able to tap into the full 3 percent, it would scarcely make a dent in the demand-supply balance.<\/p>\n<p>Then there is this inconvenient fact: <b>OPEC would have the final say on whether increased U.S. production lowered world prices.<\/b> OPEC easily could scale back total production by the same amount to wipe out any price effects. <a title=\"Opec makes surprise cut to oil output\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0\/a0fad666-7ece-11dd-b1af-000077b07658.html\">They did it just this week<\/a> in response to falling oil prices.<\/p>\n<p>Drilling will not reduce fuel prices, and will not make us more energy independent. The only way to achieve these goals is to reduce our dependence on oil &#8211; foreign or domestic &#8211; through fuel economy, and a <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/06\/06\/republicans_block_action\/\">cap on carbon emissions<\/a>. A carbon cap will <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/05\/16\/race_for_clean_energy\/\">spur innovation<\/a> and shift us into a green energy economy.<\/p>\n<h3>It Would Harm the Environment<\/h3>\n<p>If drilling for oil in ANWR could possibly do us some good, then perhaps one could make the argument that we should do it &#8211; even if it did bring harm to wildlife and ecosystems. But to harm ecosystems for no benefit at all is just plain stupid &#8211; and it <i>would<\/i> cause harm.<\/p>\n<p>The northern coastal plain of ANWR &#8211; the proposed area for drilling &#8211; has been characterized by the &#8220;drill, drill, drill&#8221; crowd as a &#8220;wasteland&#8221;. But, says EDF geographer Peter Black, it&#8217;s in fact a vital part of the ANWR ecosystem. Just because it doesn&#8217;t look like an appealing tourist spot doesn&#8217;t mean it isn&#8217;t worth protecting.<\/p>\n<p>Nor does it make sense to argue that the area opened for drilling would be very small. First of all, these areas tend to expand. The nearby Prudhoe Bay oil fields were originally supposed to comprise 2100 acres, but today they spread over 640,000 acres. Plus, as EDF wildlife expert Michael Bean notes, &#8220;The effects of development extend well beyond the physical limits of that footprint.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And there&#8217;s no question that it would do harm. Oil spills in nearby Prudhoe Bay are common and the consequences are devastating (see this <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wilderness.org\/Library\/Documents\/upload\/Facts-OilSpillsAndFines.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Wilderness Society report [PDF]<\/a> for pictures and statistics).<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s another issue to consider: Drilling in a wildlife refuge is a slippery slope. What&#8217;s next? Drilling in wilderness areas? National Parks? What&#8217;s the value of a protective designation if the land isn&#8217;t protected?<\/p>\n<h3>There Are Other Places to Drill<\/h3>\n<p>ANWR isn&#8217;t our only option for domestic drilling. There are <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/leading-the-news\/pelosi-drilling-in-protected-areas-a-hoax-2008-07-10.html\">millions of acres already open to drilling where oil companies have not yet explored<\/a>. As my Mom used to say, finish what&#8217;s on your plate before you ask for seconds.<\/p>\n<p><i>This post is by Sheryl Canter, an online writer and editorial manager at Environmental Defense Fund.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>U.S. oil companies already have permission to drill in millions of unexplored acres, but there is a push now to drill in one area where they don&#8217;t have permission: the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). A terrible idea, drilling in ANWR would: Not produce much oil. Not lower gas prices. Harm the environment. If you &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[116,202],"tags":[],"coauthors":[108200],"class_list":["post-630","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-energy-technologies","category-greenhouse-gas-emissions"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Why Drilling in Alaska&#039;s ANWR Is a Bad Idea - Climate 411<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why Drilling in Alaska&#039;s ANWR Is a Bad Idea - Climate 411\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"U.S. oil companies already have permission to drill in millions of unexplored acres, but there is a push now to drill in one area where they don&#8217;t have permission: the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). A terrible idea, drilling in ANWR would: Not produce much oil. Not lower gas prices. Harm the environment. If you ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate 411\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-11T16:24:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-13T20:06:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sheryl Canter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sheryl Canter\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2008\\\/09\\\/11\\\/anwr_oil_drilling\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2008\\\/09\\\/11\\\/anwr_oil_drilling\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sheryl Canter\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/10a6a5be439e69a039b6476eb09e81a8\"},\"headline\":\"Why Drilling in Alaska&#8217;s ANWR Is a Bad Idea\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-11T16:24:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-13T20:06:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2008\\\/09\\\/11\\\/anwr_oil_drilling\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":855,\"commentCount\":50,\"articleSection\":[\"Energy\",\"Greenhouse Gas Emissions\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2008\\\/09\\\/11\\\/anwr_oil_drilling\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2008\\\/09\\\/11\\\/anwr_oil_drilling\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2008\\\/09\\\/11\\\/anwr_oil_drilling\\\/\",\"name\":\"Why Drilling in Alaska's ANWR Is a Bad Idea - Climate 411\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-11T16:24:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-13T20:06:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/10a6a5be439e69a039b6476eb09e81a8\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2008\\\/09\\\/11\\\/anwr_oil_drilling\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2008\\\/09\\\/11\\\/anwr_oil_drilling\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2008\\\/09\\\/11\\\/anwr_oil_drilling\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why Drilling in Alaska&#8217;s ANWR Is a Bad Idea\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate 411\",\"description\":\"Blogging the science and policy of global warming\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/10a6a5be439e69a039b6476eb09e81a8\",\"name\":\"Sheryl Canter\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/bac98415e9c06f185f4cb60754d82d498c204e2918f8d43912c0a034ae57ba50?s=96&d=mm&r=g4d18299e79bcedd6bb3a81941c16d9e1\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/bac98415e9c06f185f4cb60754d82d498c204e2918f8d43912c0a034ae57ba50?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/bac98415e9c06f185f4cb60754d82d498c204e2918f8d43912c0a034ae57ba50?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sheryl Canter\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/author\\\/scanter\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why Drilling in Alaska's ANWR Is a Bad Idea - Climate 411","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why Drilling in Alaska's ANWR Is a Bad Idea - Climate 411","og_description":"U.S. oil companies already have permission to drill in millions of unexplored acres, but there is a push now to drill in one area where they don&#8217;t have permission: the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). A terrible idea, drilling in ANWR would: Not produce much oil. Not lower gas prices. Harm the environment. If you ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/","og_site_name":"Climate 411","article_published_time":"2008-09-11T16:24:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-13T20:06:50+00:00","author":"Sheryl Canter","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sheryl Canter","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/"},"author":{"name":"Sheryl Canter","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/10a6a5be439e69a039b6476eb09e81a8"},"headline":"Why Drilling in Alaska&#8217;s ANWR Is a Bad Idea","datePublished":"2008-09-11T16:24:06+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-13T20:06:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/"},"wordCount":855,"commentCount":50,"articleSection":["Energy","Greenhouse Gas Emissions"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/","name":"Why Drilling in Alaska's ANWR Is a Bad Idea - Climate 411","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-11T16:24:06+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-13T20:06:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/10a6a5be439e69a039b6476eb09e81a8"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/09\/11\/anwr_oil_drilling\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why Drilling in Alaska&#8217;s ANWR Is a Bad Idea"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/","name":"Climate 411","description":"Blogging the science and policy of global warming","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/10a6a5be439e69a039b6476eb09e81a8","name":"Sheryl Canter","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bac98415e9c06f185f4cb60754d82d498c204e2918f8d43912c0a034ae57ba50?s=96&d=mm&r=g4d18299e79bcedd6bb3a81941c16d9e1","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bac98415e9c06f185f4cb60754d82d498c204e2918f8d43912c0a034ae57ba50?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bac98415e9c06f185f4cb60754d82d498c204e2918f8d43912c0a034ae57ba50?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sheryl Canter"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/author\/scanter\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/630","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=630"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/630\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25909,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/630\/revisions\/25909"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=630"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}