{"id":568,"date":"2008-07-15T13:37:11","date_gmt":"2008-07-15T18:37:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/07\/15\/crp_withdrawal\/"},"modified":"2008-07-15T13:37:11","modified_gmt":"2008-07-15T18:37:11","slug":"crp_withdrawal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2008\/07\/15\/crp_withdrawal\/","title":{"rendered":"USDA: Rip Up Conservation Lands or Protect the Environment?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Lisa MooreThis post is by Lisa Moore, Ph.D.<\/a>, a scientist in the Climate and Air program at Environmental Defense Fund. You can meet Lisa at the Netroots Nation<\/a> conference, July 17-20.<\/i><\/p>\n

Congress and producer groups are pressuring the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to release millions of acres from Conservation Reserve Program<\/a> (CRP) contracts and open them up to crop production. Supporters say this move would increase production and bring down food prices.<\/p>\n

Wrong! Ripping up conservation lands would not make a big dent in commodity supplies or prices, but it would waste billions of taxpayer dollars that have been invested in conservation on these lands.<\/p>\n

It also would be a tragedy for wildlife, water quality, and climate.<\/b> <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

There are approximately 35 million acres protected under CRP, about the size of the state of Iowa. The program rewards farmers who take land out of production and use it to restore valuable ecosystems. Landowners who back out of their contracts early must reimburse the government for the payments they have already received, and pay an additional penalty.<\/p>\n

Now the USDA is considering waiving these costs for up to 24 million acres, allowing farmers to bail out early on their contracts and plant row crops on this land.<\/b><\/p>\n

As croplands, these fragile areas are marginal at best, and typically have yields that are half what you could get on good cropland. Why do you think they were taken out of production in the first place?<\/p>\n

But as restored wetlands, forests, and grasslands, they are tremendously valuable. They decrease erosion, improve water quality, store carbon<\/a>, and provide critical habitat for declining grassland birds and waterfowl. In fact, the CRP is sometimes called a "duck factory".<\/p>\n

Ripping up CRP land to plant row crops would have devastating effects:<\/p>\n