{"id":3544,"date":"2012-06-28T13:01:41","date_gmt":"2012-06-28T18:01:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/?p=3544"},"modified":"2012-06-28T13:01:41","modified_gmt":"2012-06-28T18:01:41","slug":"a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/","title":{"rendered":"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections"},"content":{"rendered":"

On good days, the facts prevail \u2014 and Tuesday was one of those very good days.<\/p>\n

As Fred wrote<\/a>, on Tuesday the U.S. Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C. issued a unanimous, historic\u00a0decision <\/a>upholding EPA\u2019s actions to reduce climate pollution.<\/p>\n

In our press release<\/a>, Fred called it a good day for the \u201cthin layer of atmosphere that sustains life on Earth.\u201d<\/p>\n

He\u2019s right of course. But our planet wasn\u2019t the only big winner. It was also a great day for science.<\/p>\n

The court roundly rejected challenges to EPA\u2019s science-based finding that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare (commonly called the Endangerment Finding).<\/p>\n

In the process, the court reaffirmed the importance of having rigorous, independent science as the bedrock of efforts to protect our health and environment.<\/p>\n

The court\u2019s eloquent statement<\/a> speaks for itself:\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

EPA simply did here what it and other decision-makers often must do to make a science-based judgment:\u00a0 it sought out and revised existing scientific evidence to determine whether a particular finding was warranted.\u00a0 It makes no difference that much of the scientific evidence in large part consisted of \u201csyntheses\u201d of individual studies and research.\u00a0 . . .\u00a0 This is how science works.\u00a0 EPA is not required to re-prove the existence of the atom every time it approaches a scientific question<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

(That\u2019s from page 27 of the ruling. I added the emphasis.)<\/p>\n

The court dismissed the challenges to the Endangerment Finding as without \u201cmerit\u201d, noting that EPA relied upon an \u201cocean of evidence\u201d including 18,000 peer-reviewed studies. (You can find those quotes on pages 26,\u00a034 and 38 of the decision<\/a>.) \u00a0<\/p>\n

In dismissing this challenge the court acted in concert with our long history of relying on science-based evidence — not only to shape our health and environmental protections, but as the foundation of American innovation and ingenuity.\u00a0<\/p>\n

EPA\u2019s Endangerment Finding is based on an extensive review of climate change research, including assessments of climate research prepared by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences<\/a>, the United States Global Change Research Program<\/a>, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The creation of these assessment reports involved thousands of scientists<\/strong>, reviewing thousands of articles<\/strong> from peer-reviewed research journals.<\/p>\n

This massive body of research documents the effects that rising atmospheric concentrations of heat-trapping emissions are having on our climate. It also documents the harm that climate impacts cause to human health and welfare.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Affirming EPA’s reliance on state-of-the-art climate science, the court discussed the substantial evidence supporting EPA\u2019s Endangerment Finding on page 30 of the decision<\/a>:<\/p>\n

To recap, EPA had before it substantial record evidence that anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases \u201cvery likely\u201d caused warming of the climate over the last several decades. . . \u00a0Relying again upon substantial scientific evidence, EPA determined that anthropogenically induced climate change threatens both public health and public welfare. \u00a0It found that extreme weather events, changes in air quality, increases in food- and water-borne pathogens, and increases in temperatures are likely to have adverse health effects … The record also supports EPA\u2019s conclusion that climate change endangers human welfare by creating risk to food production and agriculture, forestry, energy, infrastructure, ecosystems, and wildlife.\u00a0<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The call from scientists worldwide urging swift action to curb climate-destabilizing emissions has been heard.\u00a0<\/p>\n

EPA\u2019s efforts to fulfill its statutory responsibility to protect human health and the environment from dangerous pollution have been resoundingly affirmed.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n

It is a good day to be a scientist, and an American.<\/p>\n

(You can read more about the court cases on our website<\/a> and in my colleague Megan Ceronsky\u2019s earlier blog<\/a> on the subject. And stay tuned for more analysis of the historic decisions.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On good days, the facts prevail \u2014 and Tuesday was one of those very good days. As Fred wrote, on Tuesday the U.S. Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C. issued a unanimous, historic\u00a0decision upholding EPA\u2019s actions to reduce climate pollution. In our press release, Fred called it a good day for the \u201cthin layer of …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7370,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[95,4017,202,44,42,99],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3544","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-basic-science-of-global-warming","category-clean-air-act","category-greenhouse-gas-emissions","category-policy","category-science","category-links-and-quotes"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nA Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections - Climate 411<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections - Climate 411\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On good days, the facts prevail \u2014 and Tuesday was one of those very good days. As Fred wrote, on Tuesday the U.S. Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C. issued a unanimous, historic\u00a0decision upholding EPA\u2019s actions to reduce climate pollution. In our press release, Fred called it a good day for the \u201cthin layer of ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate 411\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-06-28T18:01:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Steven Hamburg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Steven Hamburg\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/28\\\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/28\\\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Steven Hamburg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4a51623c1599128bf1f55012c448505a\"},\"headline\":\"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-28T18:01:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/28\\\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":621,\"commentCount\":1,\"articleSection\":[\"Basic Science of Global Warming\",\"Clean Air Act\",\"Greenhouse Gas Emissions\",\"Policy\",\"Science\",\"What Others are Saying\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/28\\\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/28\\\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/28\\\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\\\/\",\"name\":\"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections - Climate 411\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-28T18:01:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4a51623c1599128bf1f55012c448505a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/28\\\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/28\\\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/28\\\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate 411\",\"description\":\"Blogging the science and policy of global warming\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4a51623c1599128bf1f55012c448505a\",\"name\":\"Steven Hamburg\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b1953880453b1b930c0c50ca41df7a7e933c892135037059b929d64a43114113?s=96&d=mm&r=gb593875e735293d43a6e67d2ea441d2e\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b1953880453b1b930c0c50ca41df7a7e933c892135037059b929d64a43114113?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b1953880453b1b930c0c50ca41df7a7e933c892135037059b929d64a43114113?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Steven Hamburg\"},\"description\":\"Chief Scientist Steven Hamburg is EDF\u2019s public voice for its commitment to science-based advocacy and is responsible for the scientific integrity of EDF\u2019s positions and programs. His training and research specialty is ecosystem ecology, with a focus on forests.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.edf.org\\\/people\\\/steven-hamburg\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.edf.org\\\/climate411\\\/author\\\/shamburg\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections - Climate 411","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections - Climate 411","og_description":"On good days, the facts prevail \u2014 and Tuesday was one of those very good days. As Fred wrote, on Tuesday the U.S. Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C. issued a unanimous, historic\u00a0decision upholding EPA\u2019s actions to reduce climate pollution. In our press release, Fred called it a good day for the \u201cthin layer of ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/","og_site_name":"Climate 411","article_published_time":"2012-06-28T18:01:41+00:00","author":"Steven Hamburg","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Steven Hamburg","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/"},"author":{"name":"Steven Hamburg","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/4a51623c1599128bf1f55012c448505a"},"headline":"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections","datePublished":"2012-06-28T18:01:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/"},"wordCount":621,"commentCount":1,"articleSection":["Basic Science of Global Warming","Clean Air Act","Greenhouse Gas Emissions","Policy","Science","What Others are Saying"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/","name":"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections - Climate 411","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-06-28T18:01:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/4a51623c1599128bf1f55012c448505a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2012\/06\/28\/a-great-day-for-science-too-more-on-the-court-decision-affirming-historic-climate-protections\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A Great Day for Science Too: More on the Court Decision Affirming Historic Climate Protections"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/","name":"Climate 411","description":"Blogging the science and policy of global warming","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/4a51623c1599128bf1f55012c448505a","name":"Steven Hamburg","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b1953880453b1b930c0c50ca41df7a7e933c892135037059b929d64a43114113?s=96&d=mm&r=gb593875e735293d43a6e67d2ea441d2e","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b1953880453b1b930c0c50ca41df7a7e933c892135037059b929d64a43114113?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b1953880453b1b930c0c50ca41df7a7e933c892135037059b929d64a43114113?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Steven Hamburg"},"description":"Chief Scientist Steven Hamburg is EDF\u2019s public voice for its commitment to science-based advocacy and is responsible for the scientific integrity of EDF\u2019s positions and programs. His training and research specialty is ecosystem ecology, with a focus on forests.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.edf.org\/people\/steven-hamburg"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/author\/shamburg\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7370"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3544"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3544\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3544"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}