{"id":26336,"date":"2026-07-01T10:00:27","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T15:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/?p=26336"},"modified":"2026-07-01T12:10:27","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T17:10:27","slug":"breaking-down-new-yorks-2026-climate-law-amendments-delayed-regulations-postpone-cuts-to-pollution-and-costs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2026\/07\/01\/breaking-down-new-yorks-2026-climate-law-amendments-delayed-regulations-postpone-cuts-to-pollution-and-costs\/","title":{"rendered":"Breaking down New York\u2019s 2026 climate law amendments: delayed regulations postpone cuts to pollution and costs"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

New York recently passed major rollbacks to its landmark Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act in an opaque process as part of New York\u2019s FY2027 budget negotiations. While the state\u2019s long-term climate commitments remain, these changes allow the state to delay action on cutting climate and health-harming pollution and slow the transition away from price-volatile fossil fuels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CLCPA amendments make changes to three major components of the law: the deadline for regulations to achieve statewide greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets, GHG emissions accounting methodology and the GHG emissions targets themselves. While strong long-term commitments are preserved, these changes collectively have the effect of allowing for less-ambitious near-term action to drive down climate pollution and improve energy affordability, risking the state\u2019s ability to timely and cost-effectively meet its long-term targets.

In this blog, we dive into the impacts of changes to the deadline for statewide regulations and how this change further delays already overdue benefits promised to New Yorkers when the CLCPA was first passed in 2019: cleaner air, decreased climate pollution and reduced dependence on price-volatile fossil fuels. Future blogs in this series will examine the impacts of other recently enacted changes to the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How climate law amendments pushed the deadline for pollution and cost-cutting regulations<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Among the amendments passed into law at the end of May was a shift to the deadline for regulations to achieve the state\u2019s GHG emissions limits. The original law required that these regulations be in place by January 1, 2024\u2014a deadline the state missed and was therefore subsequently found<\/a> by the New York State Supreme Court-Albany County to be out of compliance. Under the amended law, regulations are now not due until December 31, 2028 \u2013 nearly a decade after the law\u2019s original passage and five years after the original deadline. The state\u2019s 2022 Scoping Plan<\/a> identified cap-and-invest as the most cost-effective program design to drive down statewide GHG reductions, and the Hochul Administration previously drafted but never released cap-and-invest regulations to fulfill this requirement. If the state takes all the time it is given under the amended law, a program will not start generating pollution cuts, household energy cost savings and job creating investment programs until 2029.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CLCPA amendments delay public health, cost savings and job benefits<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Delays in these implementing regulations mean that New Yorkers continue to miss out on the public health and economic benefits promised since 2019. Looking at the effects of delaying cap-and-invest alone, the cost impacts are clear. In the intervening period between the program\u2019s originally anticipated 2025 start and a potential 2029 start, New Yorkers will have missed out on an estimated $16.7 billion in clean energy and affordability investments. These investments would fund utility bill rebates and help households adopt home efficiency measures and upgrade to clean, efficient technologies that lower bills, including electric vehicles, heat pumps, rooftop solar and more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
This chart shows the cumulative revenue New York is projected to miss between cap-and-invest\u2019s intended 2025 launch and a delayed 2029 start, totaling $16.7 billion that could have been available for affordability and climate investments over that period. Data from NYSERDA\u2019s Cap-and-Invest Preliminary Analysis<\/a>, Scenario C.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Based on prior analysis of how New York cap-and-invest dollars could flow<\/a> to clean energy programs, a delay until 2029 would mean hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers \u2013 particularly low- and moderate-income households \u2013 miss out on investments that make it cheaper and easier to access clean energy and efficiency upgrades that lead to month-over-month energy cost savings. To be clear, New Yorkers are paying more <\/em>for energy now than they would be if cap-and-invest were in place. For example, delaying cap-and-invest from 2025 to 2029 would mean:<\/p>\n\n\n\n