{"id":21966,"date":"2021-12-15T15:18:25","date_gmt":"2021-12-15T20:18:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/?p=21966"},"modified":"2021-12-16T10:15:17","modified_gmt":"2021-12-16T15:15:17","slug":"safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/","title":{"rendered":"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Coal companies and supporting states recently filed opening briefs in\u00a0West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency<\/em>, a case involving the Trump Administration\u2019s repeal of, and weak replacement for, the 2015 Clean Power Plan regulating carbon dioxide emissions from power plants.<\/p>\n

Although neither regulation is in effect \u2013 indeed, EPA has indicated that it plans to adopt a new rule working from a clean slate — Petitioners seek to use this case to effect sweeping changes in longstanding legal doctrine and well-established norms. Petitioners are not only asking the Court to do extraordinary damage to EPA authority, but also set forth their arguments expansively so as to apply to a wide range of vital services and laws \u2013 turning this case into one broadly relevant to the ability for expert agencies to protect human health, the environment, and other public values.<\/p>\n

These concerns are not theoretical. Petitioners have filed papers with the Supreme Court<\/a> that argue that tight constrictions should be put around EPA\u2019s efforts to address climate change. What Petitioners seek stands in stark contrast to what this moment demands and ignores the fact that Congress intended EPA, through the Clean Air Act, to address big problems like nationwide air pollution coming from the country\u2019s largest industries.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

These arguments are also out are out of touch with today\u2019s realities. Already one in three Americans are affected by extreme weather events, which climate change magnifies. The consequences of climate change are challenging all of society, be it through extreme drought affecting much of the western United States, power outages like those during Winter Storm Uri in Texas, flash flooding like during Hurricane Ida in Louisiana, or the roughly six million acres of land destroyed last year by wildfires.<\/p>\n

These climate change harms extend beyond singular events and put us at risk from cascading damage. Multiple reports have found that America\u2019s \u201cfamilies, workers, and businesses large and small are\u00a0vulnerable<\/a>,\u201d that climate change poses \u201ca major\u00a0risk<\/a>\u00a0to the stability of the U.S. financial system and to its ability to sustain the American economy,\u201d and that climate change exacerbates\u00a0existing\u00a0societal inequity<\/a>, disproportionately affecting low income communities and communities of color.<\/p>\n

Impeding EPA\u2019s ability to act ignores these urgent challenges. It\u2019s the climate equivalent of impounding a firetruck during a five-alarm fire.<\/p>\n

That Petitioners seek to broadly hamstring our nation\u2019s capacity to confront the climate crisis should not even be at issue before the Supreme Court. EPA has the authority and obligation to take action to protect public health and the environment. The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed as much, concluding that consistent with the Clean Air Act, EPA has the responsibility under the Clean Air Act to limit the pollution that causes climate change and regulate greenhouse gas pollution. Yet Petitioners hope that the Court will dramatically depart from settled law and legal interpretation, asking that it scrutinize rules for reasons such as the degree of \u201cpublic attention to the issue<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Additionally concerning is the basis by which Petitioners request the court to act. Here, Petitioners have asked the court to depart from decades of established legal precedent and substitute it with a greatly expanded \u201cmajor questions doctrine\u201d \u2013 requiring that any expert agency rule of significance be subject to heightened review. This doctrine has typically applied only in the most narrow of circumstances, where an expert agency took action in highly consequential matters where there was reason for serious doubt that the agency had authority at all. This would not be at issue here; the Court has already confirmed that EPA has authority to regulate power plants\u2019 carbon dioxide emissions.<\/p>\n

To undermine EPA\u2019s action, Petitioners thus seek to depart from this established understanding and substitute their own that would invalidate any regulation addressing such issues so long as challengers could characterize its implications as important.\u00a0 This change in approach may sound arcane but would \u2013 if accepted \u2013 be a norm-breaking new development that would exchange agency accountability with free-wheeling judicial activism. This outcome would inject major uncertainty across the entire realm of federal law, diminishing the capacity and predictability of vital services and expert agencies.<\/p>\n

Our nation must accelerate solutions to address climate change. Three in four\u00a0 Americans<\/a>\u00a0support regulating carbon as a pollutant. So do American businesses \u2013 it\u2019s notable that despite the rule at issue being focused on carbon pollution from the power sector, a coalition of power companies have consistently filed in defense of EPA\u2019s authority<\/a>.<\/p>\n

EDF similarly and forcefully continues to oppose Petitioners, and will be filing alongside an array of entities next month in support of public health and EPA\u2019s authority to confront the climate crisis. Those entities include the Biden Administration, a number of states, power companies, and public health and environmental groups.<\/p>\n

We also have all the briefs in the case publicly available on EDF\u2019s website. You can find everything here<\/a>. And for more about this lawsuit, please see these posts from our partners at NRDC<\/a> and Sierra Club<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Coal companies and supporting states recently filed opening briefs in\u00a0West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, a case involving the Trump Administration\u2019s repeal of, and weak replacement for, the 2015 Clean Power Plan regulating carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Although neither regulation is in effect \u2013 indeed, EPA has indicated that it plans to adopt …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39943,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4025,4024,20,44],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-21966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-carbon-pollution-standards","category-epa-litgation","category-news","category-policy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nSafeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative - Climate 411<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative - Climate 411\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Coal companies and supporting states recently filed opening briefs in\u00a0West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, a case involving the Trump Administration\u2019s repeal of, and weak replacement for, the 2015 Clean Power Plan regulating carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Although neither regulation is in effect \u2013 indeed, EPA has indicated that it plans to adopt ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate 411\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-15T20:18:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-16T15:15:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael Panfil\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Michael_Panfil\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael Panfil\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Michael Panfil\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7\"},\"headline\":\"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-15T20:18:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-16T15:15:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/\"},\"wordCount\":846,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Clean Power Plan\",\"EPA litgation\",\"News\",\"Policy\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/\",\"name\":\"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative - Climate 411\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-15T20:18:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-16T15:15:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/\",\"name\":\"Climate 411\",\"description\":\"Blogging the science and policy of global warming\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7\",\"name\":\"Michael Panfil\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/f70f279706d713c2d12907f2d1a2b88e\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/703517206ad34c5bee9c3a3f1e6aa9d349fd16823c012cd1654f9686f3f5767f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/703517206ad34c5bee9c3a3f1e6aa9d349fd16823c012cd1654f9686f3f5767f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Michael Panfil\"},\"description\":\"Attorney Michael Panfil is an attorney for the EDF Clean Energy Program, focusing on reducing energy demand throughout the electric power grid. He also engages on efforts to reduce emissions throughout the United States by advocating for the deployment of smarter technology, improved design standards, and sustainable practices. Follow Michael on Twitter \u00bb\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.edf.org\/people\/michael-panfil\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Michael_Panfil\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/author\/mpanfil\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative - Climate 411","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative - Climate 411","og_description":"Coal companies and supporting states recently filed opening briefs in\u00a0West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, a case involving the Trump Administration\u2019s repeal of, and weak replacement for, the 2015 Clean Power Plan regulating carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Although neither regulation is in effect \u2013 indeed, EPA has indicated that it plans to adopt ...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/","og_site_name":"Climate 411","article_published_time":"2021-12-15T20:18:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-16T15:15:17+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Michael Panfil","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Michael_Panfil","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael Panfil","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/"},"author":{"name":"Michael Panfil","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7"},"headline":"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative","datePublished":"2021-12-15T20:18:25+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-16T15:15:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/"},"wordCount":846,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg","articleSection":["Clean Power Plan","EPA litgation","News","Policy"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/","name":"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative - Climate 411","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg","datePublished":"2021-12-15T20:18:25+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-16T15:15:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/7\/files\/2021\/09\/Supreme-Court.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/2021\/12\/15\/safeguarding-epas-authority-at-the-supreme-court-is-a-climate-imperative\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Safeguarding EPA\u2019s authority at the Supreme Court is a climate imperative"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/","name":"Climate 411","description":"Blogging the science and policy of global warming","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/9329f039b49a976133e6ae676f044fa7","name":"Michael Panfil","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/f70f279706d713c2d12907f2d1a2b88e","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/703517206ad34c5bee9c3a3f1e6aa9d349fd16823c012cd1654f9686f3f5767f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/703517206ad34c5bee9c3a3f1e6aa9d349fd16823c012cd1654f9686f3f5767f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Michael Panfil"},"description":"Attorney Michael Panfil is an attorney for the EDF Clean Energy Program, focusing on reducing energy demand throughout the electric power grid. He also engages on efforts to reduce emissions throughout the United States by advocating for the deployment of smarter technology, improved design standards, and sustainable practices. Follow Michael on Twitter \u00bb","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.edf.org\/people\/michael-panfil","https:\/\/x.com\/Michael_Panfil"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/author\/mpanfil\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39943"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21966"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21966\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21966"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/climate411\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=21966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}