Climate 411

At COP29, Article 6 must deliver on urgent finance for forests and Indigenous communities

This blog was authored by Pedro Martins Barata, Associate Vice President, Carbon Markets and Private Sector Decarbonization and Santiago García Lloré, Senior Manager, IPLC & Conservation Partnerships, Forests

UN Climate Change, Kamran-Guliyev/ Flickr

At the start of COP29, negotiators in Baku secured a major breakthrough by agreeing on new standards for a UN-led global carbon market under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, potentially unlocking billions in funding for climate projects.

But the terms of the standards are still flexible, meaning there’s a real chance to shape them to make sure the money goes where it’s needed most – like Indigenous Peoples and local communities who are fighting to conserve the planet’s last intact forests, known as high forest, low deforestation (HFLD) regions.

The stakes are higher now than ever, especially after the recent US election, which casts doubt on future public climate funding from one of the world’s biggest economies. In this uncertain landscape, carbon markets must step up to fund critical climate solutions, especially nature-based projects like forest conservation.

Read More »

Posted in Carbon Markets, Forest protection, Indigenous People, Paris Agreement, REDD+, United Nations / Tagged , , , , | Authors: , / Comments are closed

From Cali to Belèm: Finding Common Ground for Nature and Climate

This blog was authored by Milloni Doshi, Project Manager, Global Engagement and Partnerships and Annie Mark, Senior Director, Global Partnerships.

Photo by Milloni Doshi at COP16

The Conference of the Parties (COP) of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is a global meeting focused on conserving nature. Unlike the United Nations’ larger annual climate conferences, CBD meetings are usually smaller and have a specific focus: conserving and restoring biodiversity. In 2022, countries adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), a landmark plan aimed at halting and reversing biodiversity loss by 2030. Many call it the “Paris Agreement” for nature.  

This year’s COP16 took place in Cali, Colombia and was the largest yet. Although discussions moved slowly and ended without a final agreement, COP16 sparked important conversations about how nature and climate are deeply connected. This was a positive development on the “Rio Trio” —a partnership between the leadership of the UN three conventions on biodiversity, climate, and desertification. These pathway ideas may help shape future climate talks, including next week’s COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, and COP30 next year in Belem, Brazil.  

Pathway 1: Recognizing Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs) and Their Vital Role Read More »

Posted in International, Policy, United Nations / Authors: , / Comments are closed

Beyond numbers: strengthening climate finance through evidence-based impact

As countries discuss a new goal on climate finance at the UN climate conference, COP29, we have an opportunity to boost the impact of every dollar we invest in climate action.  

In climate finance, impact represents the measurable, positive outcomes achieved through climate action—determined by tracking specific metrics like emissions reductions, adaptation results, co-benefits, and the timeliness of fund disbursement. In a recent report on quality climate finance, we argue that we need better evidence to ensure every dollar of finance has better climate impact.  

To measure impact well, we need measurable ways to track contributions to national climate plans (called Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), capture both immediate and long-term transformational change, enable learning for future interventions, and help identify scalable successful approaches.  

The evidence gap  Read More »

Posted in International, Policy, United Nations / Tagged | Authors: / Comments are closed

To increase NDC ambition, we need to change how we think about money

As we approach the United Nations climate talks, COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, UN agencies have published several reports highlighting both our progress to-date and the gaps in global climate action. The findings are concerning, but unsurprising: countries’ current climate plans, called Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), have a long way to go.  

To keep global temperature rise below 1.5°C, we need to see a 42% reduction in emissions by 2030 compared to 2019 levels – while current NDCs would only lead to 5.9% cut. But there is good news. Countries are currently writing new plans for climate action, to be submitted in 2025. Updated NDCs offer an opportunity to course correct, and turn ambitious targets into real action. 

But new targets alone aren’t a silver bullet. For countries to successfully set and implement aggressive plans, they will need climate finance to back them up. And alongside getting more money to where it is most needed, we also need to ensure that the money is quality: that countries can depend on fair, accessible and impactful finance to help them deliver results.  

In EDF’s new report ‘Quality Matters: Strengthening Climate Finance to Drive Climate Action,’ we have identified key reforms to the international climate finance system which can better enable countries to transform their NDCs into real action and put us back on track to meet the Paris Agreement goals.  

Finance as a Key to Action and Implementation 

According to the UNFCCC’s new NDC Synthesis Report, most Parties to the Paris Agreement say that finance is mission-critical to turning their NDCs into real action. 91% of Parties include specific information on finance in their NDCs, and 69% acknowledge that international climate finance is necessary to meet targets. Moreover, 76% of Parties identify stronger capacity building as key for implementation, which includes support in accessing climate finance. Many NDCs also include targets which are conditional upon receiving international financial support, meaning their goals can’t be met without the money. 

Financial support for climate action is especially important for developing countries, where underlying barriers can make climate action more expensive and challenging. For example, the costs of building a solar project in African countries is two to three times higher than in developed countries, due to high risk and low credit ratings. Additionally, more than half of low-income developing countries are currently facing some degree of debt distress, which can trap them in a vicious cycle of rising interest payments, less money to dedicate to climate action, and persisting vulnerability to climate disasters. 

[source: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/06/5-ways-align-debt-climate-development-goals/] 

The cost of climate action in developing countries is estimated to reach $2.4 trillion annually by 2030 – and NDCs have room for improvement in detailing just where that money needs to go. Just 46% of Parties provide quantitative estimates of their financial support needs, and these needs are often expressed simply as “total amounts over the time frame of the NDC.” This lack of specificity can make it a challenge to properly align finance flows – domestic and international – with climate solutions. 

Quality Finance can Enable Ambitious NDCs 

For developing countries to implement their NDCs, they will require significant financial support from donor countries and multilateral institutions. Unfortunately, current international climate finance flows often fall short – finance can be inaccessible, ineffective, or overly burdensome for countries that need it most, inhibiting their ability to meet their climate objectives. 

For example, in recent years only 23% of climate loans from Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) to developing countries were concessional, meaning they had more favorable terms than market loans. Higher proportions of non-concessional finance can drive up debt burdens and risk of economic instability, reducing the effectiveness of climate finance. Funding also often fails to reach local communities, and there is a lack of evaluation of impact when it does.  

These concerns have dangerous repercussions for the upcoming NDC updates – if countries lack trust that finance will be available or affordable, they may preemptively limit their ambition as they revise plans. Accordingly, climate finance must be high-quality to effectively support NDCs and deliver climate action.  

EDF’s new report presents key metrics of climate finance quality, including concessionality, or the terms of delivery of finance; access, or how easily finance can be secured and utilized; and impact, or how well finance results in measurable, positive outcomes. These quality considerations need to be incorporated into the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance at COP29, which will help scale resources for climate action in developing countries.  

Multilateral institutions will also play an important role in improving the effectiveness of finance. They must do more to improve access to resources and mobilize private investment in support of climate objectives to enable successful NDCs. These institutions can also align quality finance directly with the NDC process, by supporting countries with NDC investment planning approaches. Multilateral institutions should help countries to integrate climate objectives directly into national planning and budgeting processes, realign existing financial flows toward climate action, and create clear pipelines of bankable projects that support NDC targets. 

By improving the quality of finance, both through the NCQG at COP29 and structural reform beyond, we can encourage more ambitious NDC updates in 2025 and ensure that countries can successfully implement their plans. 

Posted in News / Authors: / Comments are closed

North Carolina can still avoid huge amounts of emissions (and stranded carbon emitting assets) under the state’s Carbon Plan Law. Here’s how.

On November 1, the North Carolina Utilities Commission issued an order in the Carbon Plan docket, almost two months ahead of schedule. It largely ratifies an agreement reached by Duke Energy and the state’s Public Staff, who are charged with protecting the state’s ratepayers. While the Commission drops the requirement for Duke Energy to model hitting the 70% carbon emission reduction by 2030 in state law, largely due to a boom in electricity demand, the utility is still required to take “all reasonable steps” to hit the target by the “earliest possible date.” Which begs the question, what is the earliest possible date? A new white paper from EDF comes to the conclusion that North Carolina can still hit the target by 2032, even with the new carbon-emitting resources moving forward under this order.

Read More »

Posted in Cities and states, Economics, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, News / Authors: / Comments are closed

Growing costs of climate emergency demand ambitious policy — not business as usual

 

Photo: Pexels

Fear, uncertainty and doubt are frequently-used tools to undermine environmental policy. For decades, polluters and their sympathizers rejected the existence of climate change. Now, they say climate action costs too much. This recurring argument ignores the costs working Californians are already facing from a changing climate and the clear benefits of California’s climate policy in order to justify “business as usual” for the biggest polluters.

Californians rightly want to understand fluctuations in day-to-day energy prices, but debates over these issues cannot conveniently ignore the significant costs of climate inaction, its impact on our cost of living and its disproportionate impact on families with low incomes.

  • A national report ranked California the worst state for natural disasters fueled by a changing climate, with expected annual losses totaling more than $16 billion statewide
  • Home insurance is harder and more expensive to get. Seven of California’s largest property insurers, State Farm, Allstate, Farmers, USAA, Travelers, Nationwide and Chubb recently limited new homeowners policies in the Golden State — raising questions about the stability of the California home insurance market.
  • During an 11-year period, exposure to wildfire smoke caused more than 50,000 deaths in California and more than $400 billion in economic impacts.
  • During seven extreme heat events over the past decade, California experienced $7.7 billion in losses.

Read More »

Posted in California, Carbon Markets / Authors: / Comments are closed