This post is by Elizabeth Thompson, Legislative Director at Environmental Defense.
The nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) just issued an analysis that says we don’t have to choose between solving the global warming crisis and protecting the lowest-income Americans. We can do both through a well-designed cap-and-trade system.
This post is by Keith Gaby, Communications Director for the National Climate Campaign at Environmental Defense.
Part of a series on the work of the Environmental Defense Action Fund to enact an effective climate law. You can help by writing to Congress.
"You don’t need to convince me to fight global warming. I’m already with you. You need to reach others and convince them." We hear that a lot from our online activists and members. We get it and we’re doing something about it.
In the last several years, we’ve deployed scores of on-the-ground organizers and communication specialists in key swing states to recruit unlikely allies. Our new 10-minute video, "Cap. Trade. Grow.", is part of that effort.
This post is by Elizabeth Thompson, Legislative Director at Environmental Defense.
Part of a series on the work of the Environmental Defense Action Fund to enact an effective climate law. You can help by writing to Congress.The US Climate Action Partnership (US-CAP) ran its first newspaper ad [PDF] last week in the widely read Capitol Hill newspapers Roll Call and the Politico. The ad urges Congress to “take prompt action” to reduce America’s global warming pollution and recommends a “cap-and-trade program that achieves emission reductions at the lowest possible cost.”
The ad is a clear signal that the partnership of 27 major corporations and 6 leading environmental organizations is eager to assert itself in the political debate and to push the global warming solutions agenda forward.
This post is by Elizabeth Thompson, legislative director.
Part of a series on the work of the Environmental Defense Action Fund to enact an effective climate law. You can help by writing to Congress.As we launch our campaign to demand a vote on a national global warming cap and trade bill this year, some may ask why now? And why cap and trade?
Both good questions. Here’s why.
The author of today’s post, Mark MacLeod, is Director of Special Projects for the national climate campaign at Environmental Defense.
This has been Climate Week in New York and D.C., starting with the U.N. conference on Monday, then the Clinton Global Initiative annual meeting Wednesday through Friday, and finally the White House Major Economies Meeting today and tomorrow.
This week’s focus on global warming has prompted a flurry of letters around Washington, D.C. urging President Bush to support mandatory caps on greenhouse gas emissions.
The author of today’s post, Sheryl Canter, is an Online Writer and Editorial Manager at Environmental Defense.
The energy bills passed by the House and Senate may have you thinking you can relax about climate change, but think again. These bills have some important provisions and we hope they pass, but a new analysis [PDF] by Environmental Defense shows that they don’t solve the global warming problem. Even if the best fuel-saving and renewable energy provisions in the bills were combined in conference committee, greenhouse emissions would continue to rise for the next three decades.
This underscores the urgent need for this Congress to pass comprehensive climate change legislation that reduces emissions far below today’s levels.
