Climate 411

Forests first: highlights from London on the way to COP30

Last month, London hosted London Climate Action Week (LCAW), a key moment in the international climate agenda as the world looks ahead to COP30 in Belém. Forests had a strong presence throughout the week, which included more than 700 events and brought together around 45,000 participants from different regions and sectors. 

Here are three major highlights that show how forests took the spotlight, each one pointing to important areas of progress and focus: 

Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF)

Led by Brazil and supported by BRICS and global partners, the initiative aims to mobilize up to US $125 billion to provide performance-based payments to tropical forest countries, ensuring long-term finance and inclusion of Indigenous communities. TFFF is designed to complement, not substitute, current forest finance approaches such as REDD+ and carbon markets. Building on these tools, it expands the chances for tropical forest nations to gain recognition and compensation for preserving forests, reducing emissions, and safeguarding biodiversity and water systems 

In London, TFFF gained strong momentum. Countries such as the UK, Norway, Colombia, Indonesia, DRC, and Ghana expressed support, along with leaders from the private sector, Indigenous organizations, and major NGOs. During one of these events, Brazil’s Minister of Indigenous Peoples, Sônia Guajajara, confirmed the TFFF’s commitment to allocate at least 20% of its funding to Indigenous and traditional communities, an unprecedented allocation at this scale. 

REDD+ and Jurisdictional REDD+ (JREDD)

Several high-level events focused on REDD+ and JREDD. Government officials from Brazil, Peru, Indonesia, Ghana, Vietnam, and Ethiopia shared updates on their progress and investment readiness. At the same time, investors called for clearer frameworks and trustworthy transactions. The message was clear: supply and demand are growing, but there is an urgent need to move from planning to action with fair and reliable deals in place before COP30. 

Still, challenges remain. One major concern is the gap between carbon credit prices and the actual costs of implementing REDD+ programs. Jurisdictions are responsible for complex and often expensive processes, including legal requirements, safeguards, and reporting systems, just to access payments. Delays in issuing carbon credits, caused by technical barriers and underestimating real costs of implementing REDD+, have also created frustration for many stakeholders, including Indigenous Peoples, local communities, and public agencies. These delays often extend beyond political cycles, putting at risk the support and momentum needed on the ground. 

To move forward, it is crucial to build proof-of-concept cases in countries where credits are already being issued. These examples can help others learn, stay motivated, and see the value, both economic and social, of REDD+ and JREDD implementation. 

Wildfires and forest resilience

Extreme Wildfires are both a cause and result of climate change. They threaten ecosystems, carbon storage, and human lives. Responding to them means improving forest governance, providing more funding, and recognizing the role of traditional fire knowledge. Supporting cultural fire practices and local strategies in combination with the right technology can reduce fire risks and strengthen the connection between climate, biodiversity, and land management. 

During LCAW 2025, wildfires were a discussion topic. One key event, hosted by the Global Wildfire Collective with academic and government partners, looked at the impacts of extreme fires from environmental to public health threats. Speakers including scientists, policymakers, NGOs, exchanged ideas on how to build resilience. They stressed the importance of blending science with local knowledge and called for stronger global coordination. Strengthening forest resilience is essential, not only to reduce the damage from extreme wildfires, but also to preserve natural wildfire regimes. 

Looking ahead: from London to New York

As LCAW came to a close, a few urgent messages stood out: The urgency for more flexible and directly accessible climate finance to kickstart and scale local initiatives was a recurring call throughout the week, and the importance of putting communities, especially Indigenous Peoples at the heart of climate action. Another emerging theme was the growing interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in the climate agenda. AI is being used for prediction, monitoring, and planning, but also brings new challenges, especially in how it is applied fairly and effectively across different contexts. 

All of these conversations help set the stage for the next big moment on the climate calendar: New York Climate Week 2025, where the global community will gather again to share progress, shape priorities, and get ready for COP30 in Belém. 

 

Posted in News / Authors: / Leave a comment

When power bills go up in North Carolina, remember this vote

The North Carolina General Assembly’s vote to override Governor Stein’s veto of Senate Bill 266 is a major setback for North Carolina households, clean energy progress and climate leadership. Despite warnings from economists, energy experts and everyday residents, the General Assembly chose to make law a bill that will raise customer energy costs and shift billions in risk and cost from utilities and larger commercial and industrial users onto families and small businesses — at a time when energy bills are already straining household budgets.

And there’s no mistaking where the blame for this new law and its damaging effects lies: squarely on the shoulders of the powerful utility, Duke Energy, that pushed it and the legislators who caved to Duke’s demands. As quoted in a WRAL story when the veto override vote passed both chambers, I summed it up by saying, “When your power bill goes up next year, remember this vote and the legislators who shifted risk and cost onto households.”

There’s no way around it. Senate Bill 266, which will now become law, has been a flawed approach from the start. It’s bad for customers and bad for the environment.

Read More »

Posted in Carbon Markets / Authors: / Leave a comment

How the Trump administration is obstructing clean energy – and why it raises your costs

A black and white photograph of solar and wind projects is being torn in half to reveal a coal plant overlaid with an upward trend line to reflect rising costs.

Last updated August 4, 2025.

Electricity prices are rising across the U.S. Demand for electricity is going up for the first time in 20 years. And more extreme weather and heat waves are causing blackouts.

Yet instead of expanding access to low-cost, reliable clean power, the Trump administration is making the problem worse. Since Day One, the administration and its allies in Congress have pushed policies that restrict the supply of affordable, homegrown clean energy – creating a self-inflicted rate hike just as the country needs more power.

Wind and solar offer some of the cheapest – and fastest – ways to provide electric power today. In contrast, the cost to build natural gas plants is at a 10-year high and a shortage of turbines is delaying construction, while coal remains the most expensive and dirtiest way to generate power. To put it simply: Blocking cheap, clean energy while doubling down on outdated fossil fuels makes no economic or environmental sense.

The attacks on clean energy will not only hike up our electricity bills, but they will also unleash more pollution in our water and air, kill thousands of jobs and make our electric grid weaker.

How is this happening? Here are major ways the Trump administration is obstructing clean energy: Read More »

Posted in Cars and Pollution, Climate Change Legislation, Economics, Energy, Green Jobs, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Health / Tagged , , , | Authors: / Leave a comment

Financing Forest Conservation: Guiding Quality Forest Finance in the Baku to Belém Roadmap

Aerial view of a Costa Rican rainforest. Flickr/ Francisco Guerrero 2020

By Mark Moroge and Zach Cohen 

At this November’s UN Climate Conference in Belém, progress on climate finance will be measured not just in pledges, but in delivery – including for forests, which are critical to regulating the climate, sustaining biodiversity, and supporting millions of people. The driving question: how do we get more money to the people conserving critical ecosystems at the speed and scale needed to make a difference? 

Last year’s climate conference in Baku set an ambitious goal to mobilize $1.3 trillion by 2035 for developing countries. Over the coming months, countries will provide inputs on a ‘Baku to Belém Roadmap’, guiding public and private sectors to deliver on this target. While scaling climate finance is essential, so is ensuring its quality. Strengthening the affordability, accessibility, and effectiveness of climate funding must be priorities to catalyze transformative action. 

As the Baku to Belém Roadmap takes shape, these principles of quality cannot just be abstractions – they need to be translated within specific sectors and contexts. This is especially true for the forest sector, where stakeholders face underlying barriers to securing the financing they need, and where there are ripe opportunities to unlock new resources, from leveraging public money to catalyze private investment, to deploying innovative models like the Tropical Forests Forever Facility.  Read More »

Posted in Brazil, Carbon Markets, Climate Finance, Extreme Weather, Indigenous People, REDD+, United Nations / Tagged , , , , , , | Authors: , / Comments are closed

States in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative take an important step forward — and there’s room to go further

On July 1, the ten states participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) concluded their Third Program Review and announced updates that strengthen the regional cap on climate pollution, beginning in 2027. These changes also introduce new measures to protect energy affordability and reaffirm the program’s commitment to cutting pollution, promoting clean energy and supporting local communities. 

As Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) analysis shows, the case for program improvements is well supported — delivering clean electricity and critical climate and health benefits while ensuring consumer affordability. And there’s still room to do even more.

Read More »

Posted in Carbon Markets, Cities and states, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, News / Authors: , / Comments are closed

The Science Is Clear on the Dangers of Planet-Heating Pollution

This post was co-authored by EDF Climate Scientist Fiona Lo

The Trump EPA is now reconsidering, and reportedly intends to reverse, the Endangerment Finding – the science-based determination that climate pollution harms public health and welfare. That’s in spite of mountains of scientific evidence confirming that climate pollution is driving extreme weather events and putting people at risk.

The scientific evidence was clear that climate pollution endangers public health and welfare when EPA issued the Endangerment Finding in 2009 – but it is even clearer now:

Read More »

Posted in Basic Science of Global Warming, Clean Air Act, Extreme Weather, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, News, Policy, Science, Setting the Facts Straight / Authors: / Comments are closed