Climate 411

Analysis: Costly gas and infrastructure are driving Virginia’s soaring power bills

Utility bills spread out on a table.

Analysis underscores that renewable energy sources like solar are the key to keeping energy prices stable and protecting Virginians from high costs

By David Kelly, EDF Senior Director – Mid-Atlantic Region

Virginians are facing rising costs on multiple fronts, and electric bills are no exception. Virginia’s electric bills are increasing at a pace faster than general inflation and, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), bills have increased nearly 30% since 2021. It’s easy to understand the growing frustration, as some Virginians are forced to choose between paying for doctor’s visits and prescription drugs – or even food – over their electric bill. 

Drawing on Dominion Energy’s and Appalachian Power’s own filings at the State Corporation Commission (the agency that oversees utility investments and regulates ratemaking in Virginia), a new analysis from EQ Research underscores that volatile fossil fuel prices and skyrocketing utility investment in power system infrastructure are the primary drivers behind surging electricity costs for Virginia households.

While not explicitly addressed in this report, we’d be remiss, as we consider cost drivers, not to highlight that data centers represent a significant element of the need for new power system infrastructure. As the Joint Legislative and Review Commission (JLARC) data center report pointed out, this booming industry brings economic benefits to the state, but comes with cost impacts to Virginia’s electric customers. Just recently, the SCC issued an order aimed at corralling transmission and distribution system costs brought on by data center energy demand. By requiring data centers and other large users to pay a minimum of 85% of contracted distribution and transmission demand, and 60% of generation demand, among other requirements, the SCC order seeks to protect Virginia ratepayers from those costs.

While the SCC’s order is notable, the consequences to customers in a more fossil-fuel focused future are clear: the more utilities seek to invest in gas power plants and associated infrastructure, the more Virginia households will remain financially tethered to a price-volatile and increasingly expensive energy system. Meanwhile renewable energy, particularly solar paired with battery storage, is the most affordable, most rapidly-scalable energy resource available to meet Virginia’s energy needs while keeping electricity prices in check.  Read More »

Posted in Cities and states, Energy, News / Authors: / Comments are closed

Washington’s fourth cap-and-invest auction of the year shows strong demand

Results were released today for the fourth and final auction of the year in Washington’s cap-and-invest program, with strong demand projected to raise $394 million in revenue for investments in communities, affordability and climate resilience.

As Washington wraps up its third full year in operation, this still-young program continues to demonstrate how effective an ambitious cap-and-invest program can be at reducing pollution and raising revenue. And with program linkage with California and Quebec’s linked market on the horizon, Washington is at an exciting point in its program trajectory.

Read More »

Posted in California, Carbon Markets, Cities and states, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, News, Policy / Authors: / Comments are closed

How cap-and-invest can cut pollution and bring down costs for Coloradans

Colorado is facing rising costs, a rapid increase in energy demand and attacks on clean energy from the federal level. On top of all of this, the state is far from meeting its climate targets as climate-related disasters, like wildfires and droughts, become more frequent and extreme.

As Colorado leaders confront these challenges, they should consider policies that cut costly pollution and improve people’s lives right away. Cap-and-invest is a proven program that offers a two-in-one solution: Driving down dangerous pollution, while investing in stronger communities and Colorado businesses and lowering energy costs to help meet our climate goals.

Colorado Senator and candidate for Governor, Michael Bennet, just published a proposal that would create a cap-and-invest program in the state. In this blog, we will break down the basics of cap-and-invest, and how this type of program can deliver a stronger and more affordable Colorado. 

Read More »

Posted in Carbon Markets, Cities and states, Economics, News, Policy / Authors: , , / Comments are closed

California regulators prioritize keeping electric bills affordable over increasing utility shareholder profits

Energy bills have been on the rise across the nation — and California is no different. A recent study highlights a variety of factors impacting Californians electric costs, including increased costs to harden the system from wildfires and more investments in fixed-capital infrastructure.

Fortunately, energy regulators in California are poised to take two steps to address energy bill affordability, while still protecting the environment. The first is a critical decision on how energy utilities structure their profits, known as the “cost of capital”, and the second is a new set of rules focused on how California measures the affordability of utility services. 

EDF projects that, by bringing shareholder profits in check, these actions could result in over $300 million in annual savings for Californians.

Read More »

Posted in California, Cities and states, Economics, Energy, News, Policy / Authors: / Comments are closed

California’s latest cap-and-invest auction highlights opportunity for stronger climate action

Results released today for the California-Quebec cap-and-invest auction demonstrate that, while California’s reauthorization of the program through 2045 has helped keep prices off the floor, there’s clear appetite for greater ambition as California Air Resources Board (CARB) resumes its rulemaking process on program updates. The auction delivered largely stable results, with current vintages settling at a slightly lower price compared to the August auction while future vintages settled slightly higher. All current and future vintage allowances sold.

While these results demonstrate continued but modest improvement in market confidence (for context, uncertainty in the market cost California some $3 billion over the past year), they also show that there’s room for greater program ambition. The market can afford for CARB to do more to maximize the benefits of this landmark program for the state’s economy, cost of living and climate through the rulemaking process.

Read More »

Posted in California, Carbon Markets, Cities and states, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, News, Policy / Authors: , / Comments are closed