<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for On the Water Front</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront</link>
	<description>A water policy forum for the Golden State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:28:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How Much Water Does the Delta Need? State Board Set to Hold Hearing by waterguy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2010/03/15/how-much-water-does-the-delta-need-state-board-set-to-hold-hearing-2/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>waterguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=674#comment-154</guid>
		<description>More political b******t.  Until we get some way of valuing the water it is never going to be allocated properly.  EDF made this point back in 1994 during the last drought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More political b******t.  Until we get some way of valuing the water it is never going to be allocated properly.  EDF made this point back in 1994 during the last drought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Slam Dunk for the Peripheral Canal by On the Water Front &#187; How Much Water Does the Delta Need? State Board Set to Hold Hearing - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/11/no-slam-dunk-for-the-peripheral-canal/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Water Front &#187; How Much Water Does the Delta Need? State Board Set to Hold Hearing - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=374#comment-153</guid>
		<description>[...] its recommendations into the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan (“BDCP”). As my colleague Ann Hayden noted, the BDCP Steering Committee has struggled to determine the instream flows needed to protect and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its recommendations into the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan (“BDCP”). As my colleague Ann Hayden noted, the BDCP Steering Committee has struggled to determine the instream flows needed to protect and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Water policy reform package is good for California by On the Water Front &#187; How Much Water Does the Delta Need? State Board Set to Hold Hearing - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Water Front &#187; How Much Water Does the Delta Need? State Board Set to Hold Hearing - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...] supported the 2009 water policy reform package passed by the California legislature, but we have always maintained that the true test of the legislation will be how effectively its provisions are implemented. An [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] supported the 2009 water policy reform package passed by the California legislature, but we have always maintained that the true test of the legislation will be how effectively its provisions are implemented. An [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Putting the Cart Before the Horse: The Legislature calls out the Administration on rushing water decisions by The Necessity of Recycling for the Future &#124; Your Traffic Manager World Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2010/03/11/putting-the-cart-before-the-horse-the-legislature-calls-out-the-administration-on-rushing-water-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>The Necessity of Recycling for the Future &#124; Your Traffic Manager World Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=649#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] On the Water Front &#187; Putting the Cart Before the Horse: The Legislature calls out the Administ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the Water Front &raquo; Putting the Cart Before the Horse: The Legislature calls out the Administ&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Slam Dunk for the Peripheral Canal by On the Water Front &#187; Putting the Cart Before the Horse: The Legislature calls out the Administration on rushing water decisions - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/11/no-slam-dunk-for-the-peripheral-canal/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Water Front &#187; Putting the Cart Before the Horse: The Legislature calls out the Administration on rushing water decisions - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=374#comment-150</guid>
		<description>[...] specific concerns about the substance and schedule of the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan. As we highlighted before, there are specific provisions in the recent Delta legislation that are specific to the development [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] specific concerns about the substance and schedule of the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan. As we highlighted before, there are specific provisions in the recent Delta legislation that are specific to the development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Water policy reform package is good for California by annie2277</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>annie2277</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-149</guid>
		<description>standing up to the all people, businesses and corporations stealing water from the public trust wildlife uses we all champion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>standing up to the all people, businesses and corporations stealing water from the public trust wildlife uses we all champion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Water policy reform package is good for California by annie2277</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>annie2277</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Water policy reform package is good for California，this is a good measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Water policy reform package is good for California，this is a good measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The ESA: Again at the Center of the Blame Game by Meg Whitman and the Delta Smelt &#171; Real Meg Whitman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/08/18/the-esa-again-at-the-center-of-the-blame-game/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg Whitman and the Delta Smelt &#171; Real Meg Whitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=211#comment-147</guid>
		<description>[...] Of The Blame Game,&#8221; Environmental Defense Fund&#8217;s &#8220;On The Water Front&#8221; Blog, blogs.edf.org, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of The Blame Game,&#034; Environmental Defense Fund&#039;s &#034;On The Water Front&#034; Blog, blogs.edf.org, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Only a Reprieve for the Endangered Species Act by farmer2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2010/03/04/only-a-reprieve-for-the-endangered-species-act/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>farmer2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=630#comment-146</guid>
		<description>South of the delta growers are currently at a 5% allocation. You and I both know you can&#039;t trust that the feds and Ken Salazar. We have seen nothing from them to make us trust them. The fact that we may receive 30% someday after planting season&#039;s over is of no comfort. That is in no way &quot;water reliability&quot;!!! The banks won&#039;t lend on smoke and mirrors from the feds. The way I see it, the ESA is costing us at least 85% reduction in our allotment at this current time. What is fair and sensible about that. I would agree with you if they came right out and said that we are going to be at 30-45% allocation. After all Shasta is at a least 101% of average right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South of the delta growers are currently at a 5% allocation. You and I both know you can&#039;t trust that the feds and Ken Salazar. We have seen nothing from them to make us trust them. The fact that we may receive 30% someday after planting season&#039;s over is of no comfort. That is in no way &#034;water reliability&#034;!!! The banks won&#039;t lend on smoke and mirrors from the feds. The way I see it, the ESA is costing us at least 85% reduction in our allotment at this current time. What is fair and sensible about that. I would agree with you if they came right out and said that we are going to be at 30-45% allocation. After all Shasta is at a least 101% of average right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Water policy reform package is good for California by On the Water Front &#187; 60 Minutes misses opportunity to identify solutions - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Water Front &#187; 60 Minutes misses opportunity to identify solutions - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] 60 Minutes did not cover the comprehensive and historic water policy legislation, passed only 6 weeks ago, that will move California to a more sustainable water future. While they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 60 Minutes did not cover the comprehensive and historic water policy legislation, passed only 6 weeks ago, that will move California to a more sustainable water future. While they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
