<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Water policy reform package is good for California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/</link>
	<description>A water policy forum for the Golden State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:38:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On the Water Front &#187; How Much Water Does the Delta Need? State Board Set to Hold Hearing - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Water Front &#187; How Much Water Does the Delta Need? State Board Set to Hold Hearing - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...] supported the 2009 water policy reform package passed by the California legislature, but we have always maintained that the true test of the legislation will be how effectively its provisions are implemented. An [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] supported the 2009 water policy reform package passed by the California legislature, but we have always maintained that the true test of the legislation will be how effectively its provisions are implemented. An [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie2277</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>annie2277</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-149</guid>
		<description>standing up to the all people, businesses and corporations stealing water from the public trust wildlife uses we all champion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>standing up to the all people, businesses and corporations stealing water from the public trust wildlife uses we all champion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie2277</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>annie2277</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Water policy reform package is good for California，this is a good measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Water policy reform package is good for California，this is a good measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Water Front &#187; 60 Minutes misses opportunity to identify solutions - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Water Front &#187; 60 Minutes misses opportunity to identify solutions - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] 60 Minutes did not cover the comprehensive and historic water policy legislation, passed only 6 weeks ago, that will move California to a more sustainable water future. While they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 60 Minutes did not cover the comprehensive and historic water policy legislation, passed only 6 weeks ago, that will move California to a more sustainable water future. While they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Water Front &#187; No Slam Dunk for the Peripheral Canal - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Water Front &#187; No Slam Dunk for the Peripheral Canal - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] our recent blog highlights , there are many reasons to be pleased about the recent passage of the water policy reform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our recent blog highlights , there are many reasons to be pleased about the recent passage of the water policy reform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russianrvr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>russianrvr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Slashing fines for stealing water in CA from $5000 a day to $1000 a day is victory? This legislation has removed the existing weak deterrent for stealing water and reduced any fine dollars that would go to our poverty stricken state and somehow helped our water supply situation too by lowering the price of water theft. Why do I feel so empty if we won? 

On the Russian River we have hundreds of illegal diverters and they are causing the extinction of Salmon and Steelhead in our watershed.

So I also look forward to EDF&#039;s campaign to get the fines for stealing water reinstated to $5000 a day and standing up to the all people, businesses and corporations stealing water from the public trust wildlife uses we all champion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slashing fines for stealing water in CA from $5000 a day to $1000 a day is victory? This legislation has removed the existing weak deterrent for stealing water and reduced any fine dollars that would go to our poverty stricken state and somehow helped our water supply situation too by lowering the price of water theft. Why do I feel so empty if we won? </p>
<p>On the Russian River we have hundreds of illegal diverters and they are causing the extinction of Salmon and Steelhead in our watershed.</p>
<p>So I also look forward to EDF&#039;s campaign to get the fines for stealing water reinstated to $5000 a day and standing up to the all people, businesses and corporations stealing water from the public trust wildlife uses we all champion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffmichael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/11/04/water-policy-reform-package-is-good-for-california/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffmichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=365#comment-100</guid>
		<description>I look forward to EDFs vigorous campaign against the bond.

As you correctly state, it is bad public policy to put these costs on general taxpayers regardless of the state&#039;s fiscal position.  Subsidized water is a leading cause of our current problems, and we shouldn&#039;t repeat our mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to EDFs vigorous campaign against the bond.</p>
<p>As you correctly state, it is bad public policy to put these costs on general taxpayers regardless of the state&#039;s fiscal position.  Subsidized water is a leading cause of our current problems, and we shouldn&#039;t repeat our mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
