Water policy reform package is good for California
November 4, 2009 | Posted by Spreck Rosekrans in Bay Delta, Conservation, Fisheries, Groundwater, Legislation, Rivers, Water Supply
Laura Harnish is the California Regional Director.
Spreck Rosekrans is an Economic Analyst at EDF.
Environmental Defense Fund is delighted that the package of water policy reform bills has passed both houses of California’s legislature and will be sent to Governor Schwarzenegger for his signature. We believe this package provides a foundation that will guide environmental protection and sustainable water supply management for many years to come. And we expect that as a result, California’s farms and cities, as well as fisheries in the Bay Delta and Central Valley watershed, will be better off.
Most obviously the legislation establishes a framework for managing the Delta and the rivers that supply it with freshwater. It formally recognizes the importance of the Delta as an ecosystem while acknowledging its role in moving water from north to south. It empowers our Water Board to determine the inflows that are necessary to meet public trust requirements under California law. And the legislation establishes important oversight roles for both the legislature and a newly created Delta Stewardship Council to ensure that any changes to water infrastructure accommodate protection of the Delta and its fisheries.
It is important to realize that the legislation does not authorize a peripheral canal. It does assure, however, that a canal will only be built if important habitats are restored, water exports from the Delta are biologically sustainable, and the beneficiaries of those exports pay the full cost of construction, including environmental mitigation.
The legislation also takes important steps toward achieving our stated goal of reducing per capita water conservation in our cities 20% by 2020, thereby reducing the pressure to withdraw increasing amounts of water from the natural environment.
We are also pleased that the legislation includes provisions to identify and prevent illegal diversions of water, though we regret that the initial language was “watered down”. Similarly, we are pleased that the legislature has finally made progress in moving toward statewide management of groundwater (the source of up to 40% of our overall supply in the driest years), though there is still much work to be done in this area.
Our largest concern is that the legislature passed an 11 billion dollar bond measure along with the policy reform bills. It is important to note that the bond measure does not become effective but will be on the ballot as an initiative in 2010. At that time California’s voters will have the opportunity to decide if we can afford it given our fiscal problems and other competing needs. Moreover, California’s electorate will be asked whether it is good public policy to make these investments as a State or if at least some of the investment decisions should be made with local funds. If approved by the voters, the funds would be used to pay for a variety of environmental, water quality and water supply programs, potentially including controversial dams in the Central Valley. In its place we would have preferred a beneficiary pays fee structure to fund the Council and needed ecosystem restoration efforts in the Delta and left the big dams and water projects to be funded directly by the users.
It would be nice to celebrate – get a six-pack, stroll down the river bank and watch restoration magically take place. But of course the ultimate outcome of this far-reaching legislation will not be known for many years and will depend considerably on how well its provisions are implemented. All stakeholders, including those who opposed the legislation, will need to work together to ensure as it is adopted that our public resources will indeed be protected as intended. The environment that Californians care so deeply about and the legacy we want to leave for our children depend on it.

3 Responses
Comment from jeffmichael
November 4th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
I look forward to EDFs vigorous campaign against the bond.
As you correctly state, it is bad public policy to put these costs on general taxpayers regardless of the state's fiscal position. Subsidized water is a leading cause of our current problems, and we shouldn't repeat our mistakes.
Comment from russianrvr
November 4th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
Slashing fines for stealing water in CA from $5000 a day to $1000 a day is victory? This legislation has removed the existing weak deterrent for stealing water and reduced any fine dollars that would go to our poverty stricken state and somehow helped our water supply situation too by lowering the price of water theft. Why do I feel so empty if we won?
On the Russian River we have hundreds of illegal diverters and they are causing the extinction of Salmon and Steelhead in our watershed.
So I also look forward to EDF's campaign to get the fines for stealing water reinstated to $5000 a day and standing up to the all people, businesses and corporations stealing water from the public trust wildlife uses we all champion!
Pingback from On the Water Front » No Slam Dunk for the Peripheral Canal - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
November 11th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
[...] our recent blog highlights , there are many reasons to be pleased about the recent passage of the water policy reform [...]
Leave a Reply
You must log in to post comments | Login | Register an account
User comments reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of Environmental Defense Fund. We reserve the right to delete comments that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate. We also reserve the right to delete duplicate comments, or comments that have no relationship to the original post.