<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making the Delta Work Tomorrow: Recovering fish while supplying water reliably</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/09/25/making-the-delta-work-tomorrow-recovering-fish-while-supplying-water-reliably/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/09/25/making-the-delta-work-tomorrow-recovering-fish-while-supplying-water-reliably/</link>
	<description>A water policy forum for the Golden State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:38:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the Feds take on the Bay-Delta Crisis &#171; Regurgitation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/09/25/making-the-delta-work-tomorrow-recovering-fish-while-supplying-water-reliably/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>the Feds take on the Bay-Delta Crisis &#171; Regurgitation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=267#comment-133</guid>
		<description>[...] in concert with the State of California and local authorities in producing the Bay Delta Conservation Plan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in concert with the State of California and local authorities in producing the Bay Delta Conservation Plan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Water Front &#187; An important week in CA water: the Feds take on the Bay-Delta Crisis - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/09/25/making-the-delta-work-tomorrow-recovering-fish-while-supplying-water-reliably/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Water Front &#187; An important week in CA water: the Feds take on the Bay-Delta Crisis - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=267#comment-132</guid>
		<description>[...] in concert with the State of California and local authorities in producing the Bay Delta Conservation Plan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in concert with the State of California and local authorities in producing the Bay Delta Conservation Plan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susans</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/2009/09/25/making-the-delta-work-tomorrow-recovering-fish-while-supplying-water-reliably/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>susans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/waterfront/?p=267#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I understand the primacy of the Delta in all things water (and applaud the efforts of EDF and others to protect its habitat), but wonder why the BDCP is only considered in regards to its impacts on the Delta, good or bad.  The canal will open up a new avenue for transporting water from the Sacramento watershed to users south of the Delta.  Some of us up north believe the Delta debacle is all that saves us from turning the Sac into the San Joaquin.  If the new conveyance infrastructure comes without adequate safeguards for the source areas producing the water to be conveyed, we could end up with two valuable aquatic ecosystems in the toilet.  Who represents the Sacramento River in these discussions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the primacy of the Delta in all things water (and applaud the efforts of EDF and others to protect its habitat), but wonder why the BDCP is only considered in regards to its impacts on the Delta, good or bad.  The canal will open up a new avenue for transporting water from the Sacramento watershed to users south of the Delta.  Some of us up north believe the Delta debacle is all that saves us from turning the Sac into the San Joaquin.  If the new conveyance infrastructure comes without adequate safeguards for the source areas producing the water to be conveyed, we could end up with two valuable aquatic ecosystems in the toilet.  Who represents the Sacramento River in these discussions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
