Fix-it-First is the Smarter Choice for Jobs, the Environment, and our Safety
December 3, 2009 | Posted by Carrie Denning in Federal Transportation Policy, Jobs
This past summer I worked in Mumbai, India, researching ways to help offset the cost of their 195.25 billion Rupee ($4.2 billion U.S. Dollars) metro system. What I discovered was that governments need to make smart planning choices when it comes to infrastructure, and often large, attention grabbing capital projects are not the best bang for the buck. While a metro system would solve some of Mumbai's urban mobility problems, 25% of the population cannot afford transit fares and 33% either walk or bicycle.

Fixing transportation infrastructure now avoids rough breaks later
There's another approach that would have a bigger, more equitable impact: fix-it-first, which prioritizes rehabilitation and operation of existing transportation investments, such as repaving roads and preventative bridge maintenance.
The U.S. needs to be wary of this, too. With unemployment at a 26-year high, Democrats in the House are suggesting jobs legislation by the December recess, and it is hinted that some of the funding might be spent on our nation's transportation infrastructure.
Numerous voices are in favor of using these dollars to repair our crumbling roads and bridges, including a recent Brookings Institution article, Oregon Representative Earl Blumenauer's USA Today Op-Ed, and Transportation for America's (T4) letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Fixing our existing system instead of funding new capital projects, such as adding new highways or financing bottom-up projects, is a win-win for American jobs, the environment, and safe transportation. Here's why:
- Fix-it-first creates immediate jobs: Money enters the economy within months because funds are not spent buying new land or acquiring right-of-ways. Unlike capital projects which require skilled engineers, fix it first projects, like repainting bridges and sealing cracks, require less intensive training, and most state employees are already trained to do maintenance work and are familiar with the needs of their region.
- Fix-it-first is better for the environment: By maintaining existing infrastructure, states avoid unnecessary highway expansion and road widening projects, which boost vehicle miles traveled, increase greenhouse gas emissions, and negatively impact public health.
- Fix-it-first is safer: Every day millions of Americans rely upon our nation's highways and bridges to get to work and transport goods across the country. Maintaining our existing investment is the responsible choice. The safer choice is the smarter choice, too, as the cost of proactive repairs are between 1/6 and 1/14 the cost of a complete overhaul once a bridge or road is in poor condition.
The transportation sector is responsible for approximately 28% of domestic greenhouse gases emissions, and smart transportation spending policies that improve mobility and reduce vehicle miles traveled are the kind of transportation policies we need for the 21st century. Fix-it-first is the smarter choice for our infrastructure investments, American jobs, our environment, and our safety.

6 Responses
Pingback from Streetsblog Capitol Hill » Senate Version of Wall Street Transportation Tax Coming Next Week
December 4th, 2009 at 2:01 pm
[...] spending, and it remains to be seen whether new revenue sources will translate into merit-based or "fix-it-first" funding of transportation [...]
Pingback from Streetsblog Capitol Hill » NY and CA: How Did They Spend Transportation Stimulus Money?
December 7th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
[...] federal "fix-it-first" mandate, which environmental groups and transportation reformers are urging Congress to include in the new jobs bill, would help break down the cultural divide between [...]
Pingback from Streetsblog San Francisco » NY and CA: How Did They Spend Transportation Stimulus Money?
December 7th, 2009 at 2:26 pm
[...] federal "fix-it-first" mandate, which environmental groups and transportation reformers are urging Congress to include in the new jobs bill, would help break down the cultural divide between [...]
Pingback from Streetsblog Los Angeles » NY and CA: How Did They Spend Transportation Stimulus Money?
December 8th, 2009 at 8:25 am
[...] federal "fix-it-first" mandate, which environmental groups and transportation reformers are urging Congress to include in the new jobs bill, would help break down the cultural divide between [...]
Pingback from Transportation Policy: A Wish List for 2010 | Sustainablog
January 21st, 2010 at 1:55 pm
[...] Federal funding for transportation infrastructure improvements should be prioritized so that existing roads and bridges are repaired before we expand our system. This saves money in the long run and provides immediate [...]
Pingback from Transportation in Jobs Bill: Chance to Act on Lessons Learned | TheCityFix DC
March 1st, 2010 at 1:13 pm
[...] first step in targeting transportation funding towards projects that support national goals is the “fix-it-first” initiative currently being discussed that would prioritize the rehabilitation and operation of [...]
Leave a Reply
User comments reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of Environmental Defense Fund. We reserve the right to delete comments that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate. We also reserve the right to delete duplicate comments, or comments that have no relationship to the original post.