<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes More Like Asbestos Than We Thought?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/17/are-multi-walled-carbon-nanotubes-more-like-asbestos-than-we-thought/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/17/are-multi-walled-carbon-nanotubes-more-like-asbestos-than-we-thought/</link>
	<description>Our experts&#039; views on chemical and nano news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:21:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lung mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/17/are-multi-walled-carbon-nanotubes-more-like-asbestos-than-we-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>lung mesothelioma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/17/are-multi-walled-carbon-nanotubes-more-like-asbestos-than-we-thought/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>nice post , many accident asbetos have a bad effect for life. but you have good advice through this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post , many accident asbetos have a bad effect for life. but you have good advice through this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/17/are-multi-walled-carbon-nanotubes-more-like-asbestos-than-we-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 09:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/17/are-multi-walled-carbon-nanotubes-more-like-asbestos-than-we-thought/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Many people are feel scared of de nanons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people are feel scared of de nanons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary slattey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/17/are-multi-walled-carbon-nanotubes-more-like-asbestos-than-we-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>mary slattey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/17/are-multi-walled-carbon-nanotubes-more-like-asbestos-than-we-thought/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I would like to email Dr. Balbus; we are looking for a solid accurate assessment of potential health effects of building a refinery in Union County SD.  The proposed site would be 50 feet above the Missouri River aquifer; and of course be surrounded by crops, two schools withing 10 miles.  This is a 400000 gallon per day refinery.  There will be a vote this month by the county.  Clearly childhood ashma, luekemia and possibly lymphomas have been tied to living near a refinery.  Suface water contamination is a concern because of the Missouri River.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to email Dr. Balbus; we are looking for a solid accurate assessment of potential health effects of building a refinery in Union County SD.  The proposed site would be 50 feet above the Missouri River aquifer; and of course be surrounded by crops, two schools withing 10 miles.  This is a 400000 gallon per day refinery.  There will be a vote this month by the county.  Clearly childhood ashma, luekemia and possibly lymphomas have been tied to living near a refinery.  Suface water contamination is a concern because of the Missouri River.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->