<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My CNT is Better than Your CNT&#8230; Or At Least It&#039;s Different</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/07/not-all-cnts-are-created-equal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/07/not-all-cnts-are-created-equal/</link>
	<description>Our experts&#039; views on chemical and nano news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:07:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Maynard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/07/not-all-cnts-are-created-equal/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/04/07/not-all-cnts-are-created-equal/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Cal,

An interesting aside to this - last year we published a paper looking at the physical characteristics of airborne aggregates released from single waled carbon nanotube paper.  One surprising outcome was that two different batches of what was purportedly the same material led to completely different particles being released; most likely with very different risk profiles.  From the first batch, particles were compact and predominantly non-nanotube carbonaceous material.  But from the second batch, very open-structured aggregates of carbon nanotubes were released.

Images and further details in: http://dx.doi.org:10.1007/s11051-006-9178-2

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal,</p>
<p>An interesting aside to this &#8211; last year we published a paper looking at the physical characteristics of airborne aggregates released from single waled carbon nanotube paper.  One surprising outcome was that two different batches of what was purportedly the same material led to completely different particles being released; most likely with very different risk profiles.  From the first batch, particles were compact and predominantly non-nanotube carbonaceous material.  But from the second batch, very open-structured aggregates of carbon nanotubes were released.</p>
<p>Images and further details in: <a href="http://dx.doi.org:10.1007/s11051-006-9178-2" rel="nofollow">http://dx.doi.org:10.1007/s11051-006-9178-2</a></p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
