Let Them Eat Crumbs!
July 12, 2007 | Posted by Scott Faber in Uncategorized
Farmers who produce fruits, nuts and vegetables account for roughly half of all farm sales but get virtually no support from USDA.
For the first time, fruit and vegetable producers producers have sought a relatively small slice of federal farm spending.
These growers — who take their cues from the market, not from the government — are not even looking for a fair share. They are not looking for income subsidies. They just want a small slice of the pie.
The EAT Healthy America Act introduced by Rep. Dennis Cardoza on behalf of fruit and vegetable growers would increase USDA conservation, research, rural development, and marketing programs — initiatives that boost the profitability of all farmers but that do not provide direct subsidies. In particular, the Cardoza bill — which has 118 bipartisan co-sponsors — would expand links between farmers and consumers, take steps to improve food safety, and reward farmers who use their pesticides with greater care.
The “specialty crop” provisions of the EAT Healthy Bill would cost about $1.6 billion a year. But, so far, the House Agriculture Committee has provided just $465 million over five years for initiatives support for fruit and vegetable farmers — and roughly $33 billion in direct subsidies over five years for the producers of corn, soybeans, cotton, rice and other beneficiaries of depression-era subsidies.
That’s not a slice. That’s not even a crumb.
No wonder Rep. Cardoza, quoted in today’s Congress Daily, is angry.
He told reporters that the Chairman’s bill, which also shortchanges, conservation, energy and nutrition spending, “needs substantial work” and could not “sustain a floor vote at this time.” While Cardoza would not support proposals to replace subsidies with risk management accounts, as proposed by Reps. Kind and Flake, he does supports efforts to cut subsidies. “The bill does not need a total overhaul, but it could use a different direction,” Cardoza said, and he warned that reformers will get “traction if we don’t make changes.”
Chairman Peterson has said writing the Farm Bill on the floor would be a “recipe for chaos.” But a Farm Bill that continues to send half of all farm spending to just 20 congressional districts will leave a lot of members of Congress with less than crumbs, including most members from New York, California, and Florida.
Here’s hoping the Chairman works with leadership to cook up a pie that feeds more than a few fat cat farmers in a few states and districts.


3 Responses
Comment from RB
July 12th, 2007 at 10:23 am
The farmers of fruits nuts and vegetable are fighting a very hard uphill battle against the Agricultural-Industrial Complex consisting of wheat, corn, soybeans, cotton, rice manufacturers (i.e. growers) and the giant agra-businesses (e.g. ADM, Cargill, ConAgra) built upon them and which control them. The houses Agriculture Committee is of course controlled by this Agricultural-Industrial complex. Its all about large profits for these giant companies.
Pingback from FarmPolicy.com » Blog Archives » Johanns Comments on the House Farm Bill
July 13th, 2007 at 6:14 am
[...] In more specific Farm Bill developments, Scott Faber noted yesterday at The Ruminant that, βThe EAT Healthy America Act introduced by Rep. Dennis Cardoza on behalf of fruit and vegetable growers would increase USDA conservation, research, rural development, and marketing programs β initiatives that boost the profitability of all farmers but that do not provide direct subsidies. In particular, the Cardoza bill β which has 118 bipartisan co-sponsors β would expand links between farmers and consumers, take steps to improve food safety, and reward farmers who use their pesticides with greater care. [...]
Pingback from The Ruminant » Cornspiracy Theories - Environmental Defense
July 15th, 2007 at 11:47 am
[...] Let Them Eat Crumbs! [...]
Leave a Reply
User comments reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of Environmental Defense Fund. We reserve the right to delete comments that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate. We also reserve the right to delete duplicate comments, or comments that have no relationship to the original post.