Exposure to toxic flame retardants is an environmental justice issue: New research finds differential exposure in children

Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Senior Scientist.

A peer-reviewed paper released today documents that nonwhite toddlers in North Carolina carry nearly twice as much of certain toxic flame retardant chemicals in their blood compared with white toddlers.  The finding adds to a growing body of evidence that exposures to toxic chemicals are higher in communities of lower socioeconomic status.

Numerous other studies have found higher levels of the flame retardants known as polybrominated diphenyl ethers, or PBDEs, in children and adolescents relative to adults.  The current study – authored by Stapleton et al., and appearing in Environmental Health Perspectives – may be the first, however, to demonstrate differential exposure based on socioeconomic status.

The authors studied a group of about 80 toddlers 1-3 years old living in North Carolina.  PBDEs were detected in 100% of the blood samples drawn from the toddlers, as well as in all samples of house dust and 98% of hand wipes tested by the authors.

The authors note that children’s exposure to PBDEs is especially concerning “due to their known endocrine disrupting and neurodevelopmental properties as observed in animal studies.”  They also note recent human studies reporting correlations between blood levels of PBDEs and motor, cognitive and behavioral performance in children.  PBDEs were the primary focus of a scathing expose of chemical industry deception and manipulation of science that ran recently in the Chicago Tribune, about which I blogged earlier.

Time Magazine has an excellent article on the new research and the larger context.

Interestingly, the higher levels of PBDEs found in the blood of nonwhite toddlers could not be explained by higher levels in house dust in the homes in which those toddlers reside, as the authors found no statistically significant difference in the concentrations of the PBDEs the measured in house dust samples across their cohort.  House dust is known to be a major, but not the only source of PBDE exposure.  The authors note that in this study they did not take into account dietary differences or variability over time or other differences in exposure patterns that may help explain the differential blood serum levels they observed.

Other important conclusions of the authors about PBDE exposure:

  • Exposure via the indoor environment is substantial, and much of that exposure in toddlers is likely occurring via hand-to-mouth activity.
  • These factors likely explain the higher levels seen in toddlers than adults, because toddlers engaged in more hand-to-mouth activity and spend longer amounts of time at home.
  • One particular PBDE congener was an exception and showed higher levels in toddlers of higher socioeconomic status; the authors postulate that exposure via breastfeeding – the duration of which studies indicate is higher in women of higher socioeconomic status – may be a more important pathway for this particular PBDE.

This entry was posted in Emerging Science, Health Science and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

2 Comments

  1. Judy Robinson
    Posted May 24, 2012 at 5:34 am | Permalink

    Dr. Denison: Thank you for speaking to this issue and highlighting Dr. Stapleton's important research. Here are two additional studies that reinforce her conclusion that with respect to flame retardant exposure, race matters:

    • The University of California Berkeley found Mexican American 7-year-olds in California have more PBDE chemicals marketed as flame retardants in their bodies than almost all other people tested worldwide.
    • A study of PBDEs in 6 to 8 year old girls from California and Ohio found racial disparity in PBDE body burden. Higher concentration occurred in blacks compared to whites. (Windham et al. 2010)

    • Posted May 24, 2012 at 10:44 am | Permalink

      Judy: Thanks very much for noting these additional studies. I should have noted in my post that Stapleton et al. identified race as well as mothers' education as key measures of socioeconomic status, although due to low sample sizes they were able to use only a white/non-white categorization to show statistically significant differences in exposure. All of these data together point to higher body burdens of PBDEs in children in low-income communites and communities of color.
      Best, Richard

  • About this blog


    Science, health, and business experts at Environmental Defense Fund comment on chemical and nanotechnology issues of the day.
    Our work: Chemicals
  • Categories

  • Get blog posts by email

    Subscribe via RSS

  • Filter posts by tags

    • aggregate exposure (10)
    • Alternatives assessment (3)
    • American Chemistry Council (ACC) (55)
    • arsenic (3)
    • asthma (3)
    • Australia (1)
    • biomonitoring (9)
    • bipartisan (6)
    • bisphenol A (19)
    • BP Oil Disaster (18)
    • California (1)
    • Canada (7)
    • carbon nanotubes (24)
    • carcinogen (22)
    • Carcinogenic Mutagenic or Toxic for Reproduction (CMR) (12)
    • CDC (6)
    • Chemical Assessment and Management Program (ChAMP) (13)
    • chemical identity (30)
    • chemical testing (1)
    • Chemicals in Commerce Act (3)
    • Chicago Tribune (6)
    • children's safety (23)
    • China (10)
    • computational toxicology (11)
    • Confidential Business Information (CBI) (53)
    • conflict of interest (4)
    • consumer products (48)
    • Consumer Specialty Products Association (CSPA) (4)
    • contamination (4)
    • cumulative exposure (4)
    • data requirements (46)
    • dermal exposure (1)
    • diabetes (4)
    • DNA methylation (4)
    • DuPont (11)
    • endocrine disruption (28)
    • epigenetics (4)
    • exposure and hazard (49)
    • FDA (8)
    • flame retardants (20)
    • formaldehyde (15)
    • front group (13)
    • general interest (22)
    • Globally Harmonized System (GHS) (5)
    • Government Accountability Office (5)
    • hazard (6)
    • High Production Volume (HPV) (22)
    • in vitro (14)
    • in vivo (11)
    • industry tactics (41)
    • informed substitution (1)
    • inhalation (18)
    • IUR/CDR (27)
    • Japan (3)
    • lead (6)
    • markets (1)
    • mercury (4)
    • methylmercury (2)
    • microbiome (3)
    • nanosilver (6)
    • National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (20)
    • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (7)
    • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (5)
    • National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) (7)
    • National Toxicology Program (1)
    • obesity (6)
    • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (3)
    • Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) (4)
    • Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (16)
    • Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) (3)
    • oil dispersant (18)
    • PBDEs (16)
    • Persistent Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT) (22)
    • pesticides (7)
    • phthalates (17)
    • polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) (5)
    • prenatal (6)
    • prioritization (35)
    • report on carcinogens (1)
    • revised CSIA (3)
    • risk assessment (69)
    • Safe Chemicals Act (24)
    • Safer Chemicals Healthy Families (33)
    • Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) (20)
    • Small business (1)
    • South Korea (4)
    • styrene (6)
    • Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) (15)
    • systematic review (1)
    • test rule (17)
    • tributyltin (3)
    • trichloroethylene (TCE) (3)
    • Turkey (3)
    • U.S. states (14)
    • vulnerable populations (1)
    • Walmart (2)
    • worker safety (23)
    • WV chemical spill (11)