Sticking Point: Nanotechnology, Lizard Feet, and Taping Grown Men to the Ceiling

John BalbusCal Baier-Anderson, Ph.D., is a Health Scientist.

We often think of nanotechnology as the latest product of ultra-modern science, but humans did not invent the nanoscale. We were not even the first to use materials with nanoscale features: The gecko beat us to it by several million years. Even more impressive, this little reptile has managed to use nanoscale materials apparently without experiencing any ill effects. It remains to be seen if we will be able to do this.

Intriguing nanoscale features can be found in nature, including the “hairs” on the foot pads of the gecko, which have provided inspiration for the development of artificial adhesives, shown below in a figure from a paper recently published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences:

nano_adhesive.jpg

The photo collage illustrates how the researchers have tried to model the assembly of nanoscale features found on the gecko’s foot to engineer materials that have strong adhesive properties. The first two photos show the nanoscale features of the gecko’s foot, which consists of micrometer-sized “setae” (photo A) that are actually bundles of 100 – 200 nanometer “spatulas” (photo B). Photos C – H illustrate the researchers’ efforts to mimic these structures, by planting multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on a thin, flexible surface to create a “gecko tape.” The researchers report that a 1-cm2 area of gecko tape can support nearly 4 kilograms of weight! This means that a 180-pound (82-kilogram) man could be suspended by a piece of tape no larger than the cross-section of a 2 x 4.

While I am amazed and intrigued by this novel nanoscale material, as a toxicologist, my job is to also think about the potential downsides of new technology. In a recent post, my colleague John Balbus discussed some of the serious concerns emerging about possible health effects of certain MWCNTs.

So what measures are prudent to consider before we start making and using gecko tape all over the place? Certainly, we hope that workers in the laboratory making the stuff are already taking appropriate steps to prevent incidental inhalation or ingestion. But should we be concerned about tape capable of suspending grown men from falling, for example, into the hands of college fraternities?

I also wonder whether the MWCNTs will slough off of the tape during use. If they do and are inhaled, what kind of hazard might they pose to consumers? And then there is the question of how such tape is to be disposed of ….

So while I can get as excited about these new, cool technologies as the next person, I think all of us – researchers, manufacturers, regulators and consumers – need to take the broader view and think this through before we find ourselves in a sticky situation.

This entry was posted in Health Science and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

3 Comments

  1. astroknott
    Posted September 8, 2008 at 2:19 am | Permalink

    You say "But should we be concerned about tape capable of suspending grown men from falling, for example, into the hands of college fraternities?". AWESOME! I would never have thought of that. But you are right, no question about it, If I had this wonderful material….well spiderman look out…..her comes geckoman!

    BTW Life IS nano-technology, I didn't think that was unknown to most people. Science is about the study of the universe and the natural world. Life is something science tries imitate. Not a bad thing.

  2. Felix Elad
    Posted September 9, 2008 at 9:24 am | Permalink

    I was very pleased to be enriched by this scientific information. In fact, I am a professional translator who has worked for many researchers who want their articles translated in another language. This has helped acquaint me with much about the environment and postmodern science.I am an environmental defence advocate and love to get much more information on the environment and scientific evolution.
    Thank you.

  3. vijayvrao10
    Posted November 16, 2008 at 1:10 am | Permalink

    What is this Nano Technology means? and it was using in TATA nanocars?

  • About this blog

    Science, health, and business experts at Environmental Defense Fund comment on chemical and nanotechnology issues of the day.

    Our work: Chemicals

  • Categories

  • Get blog posts by email

    Subscribe via RSS

  • Filter posts by tags

    • aggregate exposure (9)
    • Alternatives assessment (3)
    • American Chemistry Council (ACC) (53)
    • arsenic (3)
    • asthma (3)
    • Australia (1)
    • biomonitoring (9)
    • bipartisan (6)
    • bisphenol A (18)
    • BP Oil Disaster (18)
    • California (1)
    • Canada (7)
    • carbon nanotubes (24)
    • carcinogen (21)
    • Carcinogenic Mutagenic or Toxic for Reproduction (CMR) (12)
    • CDC (6)
    • Chemical Assessment and Management Program (ChAMP) (13)
    • chemical identity (30)
    • chemical testing (1)
    • Chemicals in Commerce Act (3)
    • Chicago Tribune (6)
    • children's safety (22)
    • China (10)
    • computational toxicology (10)
    • Confidential Business Information (CBI) (51)
    • conflict of interest (4)
    • consumer products (48)
    • Consumer Specialty Products Association (CSPA) (4)
    • contamination (4)
    • cumulative exposure (4)
    • data requirements (45)
    • diabetes (4)
    • DNA methylation (4)
    • DuPont (11)
    • endocrine disruption (28)
    • epigenetics (4)
    • exposure and hazard (49)
    • FDA (8)
    • flame retardants (20)
    • formaldehyde (14)
    • front group (13)
    • general interest (20)
    • Globally Harmonized System (GHS) (5)
    • Government Accountability Office (5)
    • hazard (6)
    • High Production Volume (HPV) (22)
    • in vitro (14)
    • in vivo (11)
    • industry tactics (40)
    • informed substitution (1)
    • inhalation (18)
    • IUR/CDR (27)
    • Japan (3)
    • lead (6)
    • markets (1)
    • mercury (4)
    • methylmercury (2)
    • microbiome (3)
    • nanosilver (6)
    • National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (18)
    • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (7)
    • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (5)
    • National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) (6)
    • obesity (6)
    • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (3)
    • Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) (4)
    • Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (15)
    • Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) (3)
    • oil dispersant (18)
    • PBDEs (16)
    • Persistent Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT) (22)
    • pesticides (7)
    • phthalates (16)
    • polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) (5)
    • prenatal (6)
    • prioritization (35)
    • risk assessment (68)
    • Safe Chemicals Act (24)
    • Safer Chemicals Healthy Families (33)
    • Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) (19)
    • Small business (1)
    • South Korea (4)
    • styrene (5)
    • Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) (15)
    • systematic review (1)
    • test rule (16)
    • tributyltin (3)
    • trichloroethylene (TCE) (3)
    • Turkey (3)
    • U.S. states (14)
    • vulnerable populations (1)
    • Walmart (2)
    • worker safety (21)
    • WV chemical spill (11)
  • Archives