New Carbon Sequestration Critique Disputed by Scientific Community

By Tim O’Connor, Attorney / Climate Policy Analyst

A recent issue of the UK Guardian has brought to the forefront the findings of paper published in the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.[1] This paper, purporting to call into question the ability of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology to serve as a solution for greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) is making waves in the scientific and climate change policy communities. Titled “Sequestering carbon dioxide in a closed underground volume,” the article suggests CCS is not a viable solution to the current problem of these emissions from fossil fuel power plants, an assertion flying in the face of accepted wisdom on the subject to date.[2]

Published by perhaps the only Texas-based husband and wife team specializing in petroleum and chemical engineering, Christine Ehlig-Economides and Michael Economides, the journal article has resulted in a significant amount of consternation[3] in the scientific community and an unfortunate level of attention by news outlets looking for a reason (scientifically supportable or otherwise) to undermine CCS as a bridge technology for greenhouse gas mitigation.[4]

In essence, the paper argues that CCS will require a much larger subsurface geographic area than previously thought to be effective.  According to the article, a single 500-MW power plant could require a land area about the size of a small U.S. state.  Due to this projected massive land need, the authors argue that CCS will be cost-prohibitive, essentially a boondoggle of the highest proportions in almost every foreseeable application.  Such an opinion is certainly not a sound bite the U.S. Department of Energy (which recently announced a $3 billion investment in CCS research, development and deployment) or power plants such as the proposed Tenaska Trailblazer site (projected to sequester 85% of its emissions using CCS) are likely to take seriously.[5]

This article has been met with an outpouring of support for CCS from a supermajority of experts making up the broader scientific community on this subject.  Indeed, a read of the responses to the journal, coupled with a review of the litany of CCS literature, show that the authors’ opinions on CCS potential are extreme outliers in the growing scientific consensus surrounding carbon sequestration.

In response to journal article and Guardian story, no fewer than four formal responses by leading CCS experts in the scientific community have been added to the public discussion, with more likely to be published.[6]

In addition, the World Resources Institute (WRI) and American Petroleum Institute (API) issued statements in response to the article, pointing out the authors’ misapplication of known petrochemical and reservoir management principles combined with improper assumptions. Of note is that no responses from the scientific community have supported the authors’ extreme projections on subsurface area needs, or their conclusions regarding limitations on pore space “injectivity” that are known to be posed by pressure considerations or other factors.

In general, scientific community responses to the article include five fundamental critiques of the authors’ methodology:

  1. A mischaracterization of reservoir outcropping leakage potential
  2. A misunderstanding of pore space dynamics and availability
  3. Fundamental errors in authors’ numerical model related to vertical and lateral migration potential (questioning the absolute impermeable boundaries assumption)
  4. Failure to take evidence from current CCS projects into account
  5. Inaccurate perception of reservoir pressure management at CCS sites

A sixth critique by the API questions the authors’ estimates (or underestimates) of the amount of enhanced oil recovery available for CO2 sequestration, a critical part of their assertion that the U.S. doesn’t have enough capacity to mitigate emissions on the level necessary to meet long-term reduction targets.

Such critiques, however, while tending to disprove the authors’ overall characterization of how much CO2 can be injected into an individual site, and how it will migrate, must make room for the valuable messages that can be drawn from their work.

First and foremost, the authors and response papers agree that, as an important first step to any project, it is necessary to confirm the aquifer size and characterize subsurface geologic conditions through an aquifer appraisal process before starting sequestration. This process of site selection will be the only way to know the subsurface characteristics of the injection site, model the probable plume migration pathways and make projections about storage potential.

Second, and perhaps as important, is that the authors and responders agree that reservoir pressure is linked to overall injectivity, and that detailed formation-scale capacity assessments should take pore volume and pressure into account.

Finally, since injected CO2 plumes can migrate laterally or vertically underground depending on geologic and injection conditions, it is critical that sequestration projects be equipped with sufficient subsurface monitoring to track CO2 migration once injection begins.

According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, when properly sited, operated and monitored, geologic sequestration projects can be expected to retain 99% of injected CO2 in the subsurface for 1000 years or more.

This finding underscores the importance of CCS as a low-carbon technology and shows the importance of educating the public about the merits of the technology.  With the fresh gut check provided by the Economides and the overwhelming response from both the scientific community, API and WRI, the desire to make CCS work as a mitigation option is receiving the attention is deserves.

The completion of a few successful commercial scale projects at home and abroad should quell concerns such as those raised in the article and allow CCS technology to grow as a major solution for reducing emissions and provide another reason to invest in innovative technologies that can help us transition to a clean energy economy.

[1] Guardian, April 27, 2010, “US research paper questions viability of carbon capture and storage”

[2] Ehlig-Economides and Economides, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 70 (2010) 123–130

[3] Haszeldine et al., Response to the article April 27, 2010 article in the Guardian

[4] Canada Free Press, Feb., 25, 2010, “Geologic Carbon Storage Can Never Work, says new US study”

[5] The Clean Economy Group, April 19, 2010, “Tenaska agrees to capture, sequester 85% of CO2 emissions in settlement with Environmental Defense Fund”

[6] 1) Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, 2) Pacific Northwest National Lab, 3) ZEP (Zero Emissions Platform), 4) Formal Reply by A. J. Cavanagh, R. S. Haszeldine and M. J. Blunt

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

50 Comments

  1. Posted May 1, 2010 at 1:03 am | Permalink

    What’s Up! Just thought I’d leave a comment. I really loved your post. Keep up the phenomonal effort.

  2. Posted May 6, 2010 at 12:49 am | Permalink

    Poor kid can’t even spell appropriate right. Tsk tsk tsk…

  3. Posted May 7, 2010 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Hello,Great blog dude! i am Fed up with using RSS feeds and do you use twitter?so i can follow you there:D.
    PS:Have you thought putting video to this web site to keep the readers more entertained?I think it works., George Mchughes

  4. Posted May 8, 2010 at 2:42 am | Permalink
  5. Posted May 9, 2010 at 8:19 am | Permalink

    Wonderful work! I also have got my own , personal weblog I simply think it is difficult to post good quality articles similar to this.

  6. Posted May 10, 2010 at 3:06 am | Permalink

    I love your blog! Good work. Hope my site get’s so popular too.

  7. Posted May 10, 2010 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    This valuable post was very significant to read, I were pleased with it a whole lot of. I’m going now to mail it to my collegues to let them read this too. Thank you a whole lot of.

  8. Posted May 13, 2010 at 6:40 am | Permalink

    Seit einigen Tagen rankt unsere Unterseite für den SEO-Contest bzw. das Keyword “WasserbettenGuerilla” in den TOP5. Nach dem ersten Beitrag zum Thema Wasserbetten Guerilla haben wir begonnen Links aufzubauen, die nun ihre Wirkung langsam aber sicher entfalten.

  9. Posted May 14, 2010 at 3:57 am | Permalink

    Some time before, I did need to buy a car for my firm but I did not earn enough cash and couldn’t purchase something. Thank God my colleague suggested to take the home loans at reliable creditors. Thus, I acted that and was happy with my term loan.

  10. Posted May 15, 2010 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    I was just searching google and found your blog, it looks great.

  11. Posted May 16, 2010 at 2:33 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the blog loaded with so many information. Stopping by your blog helped me to get what I was looking for.

  12. Posted May 16, 2010 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    Hey, cool article dude. I really like your site.

  13. Posted May 17, 2010 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    You’ll know all touching on single mother welfare in just a short amount of time.

  14. Posted May 17, 2010 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for such a cool blog. Working in community services kind of sucks sometimes. I hate finding sites that just have zero info, jobcommunity in Australia i like the only one i’ve really visited that is any good.

  15. Posted May 17, 2010 at 10:40 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for such a cool blog. Working in community services kind of sucks sometimes. I hate finding sites that just have zero info, jobcommunity in Australia i like the only one i’ve really visited that is any good.

  16. Posted May 18, 2010 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    Retain operating ,wonderful job!

  17. Posted May 19, 2010 at 2:11 am | Permalink

    My cousin recommended this blog and she was totally right keep up the fantastic work!

  18. Posted May 20, 2010 at 1:29 am | Permalink

    Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained! I’m sure you had fun writing this article.

  19. Posted May 20, 2010 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    I really enjoyed your article and would like to know if I provide a link back to your site if I can use your article on one of my sites?

  20. Posted May 20, 2010 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    Wow, that is extremely nice information, thanks.

  21. Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    Just wanted to say you have a great site and thanks for posting!

  22. Posted May 21, 2010 at 6:26 am | Permalink

    I like what you have to say. I’m going to tell my friends.Visit This

  23. Posted May 21, 2010 at 7:17 am | Permalink

    Vielen Dank für eine gute post

  24. Posted May 21, 2010 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    well done post. i depleted a time searching that swimwear with the graphic. this unique brazilian bikini as well as some similar scorching swimsuits are availble in the following. bikinis

  25. Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    wrote this cougar info.

  26. Posted May 22, 2010 at 1:01 am | Permalink

    I like what you have to say. I’m going to tell my friends.Visit This

  27. Posted May 22, 2010 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Good topics, it open my eye , thanks

  28. Posted May 22, 2010 at 6:39 pm | Permalink

    Patience is a plaster for all sores.

  29. Posted May 23, 2010 at 8:30 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the blog loaded with so many information. Stopping by your blog helped me to get what I was looking for…
    free ecards

  30. Posted May 24, 2010 at 4:57 am | Permalink

    Ho..That’s right,got it

  31. Posted May 24, 2010 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for taking the time to talk about  this, I feel  fervently  about it and I enjoy learning about this topic.  Please, as you gain data, please add to  this blog with more information.  I have found it extremely useful.

  32. Posted May 24, 2010 at 9:16 pm | Permalink

    I have been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

  33. Posted May 25, 2010 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    This is my third visit to this blog. We are starting a new initiative in the same category as this blog. Your blog provided us with important information to work on. You have done a marvellous job.

  34. Posted May 25, 2010 at 9:59 am | Permalink

    This is my third visit to this blog. We are starting a new initiative in the same category as this blog. Your blog provided us with important information to work on. You have done a marvellous job.

  35. Posted May 26, 2010 at 7:38 am | Permalink

    Have you ever considered adding more videos to your blog posts to keep the readers more entertained? I mean I just read through the entire article of yours and it was quite good but since I’m more of a visual learner,I found that to be more helpful well let me know how it turns out! I love what you guys are always up too. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the great works guys I’ve added you guys to my blogroll. This is a great article thanks for sharing this informative information.. I will visit your blog regularly for some latest post.

  36. Posted May 26, 2010 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  37. Posted May 26, 2010 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    Amazing post! I initially found your blog a week or so ago, and I subscribed to your RSS feed the very same day. I have several cool ideas for some upcoming posts you could write. I’ll send you an email shortly. Keep up the great work.

  38. Posted May 26, 2010 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    I just wanted to thank you for writing this. It really made my day :)

  39. Posted May 26, 2010 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own BlogEngine blog now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up is a fine example of it.

  40. Posted May 27, 2010 at 5:44 am | Permalink

    Hi webmaster, commenters and everybody else !!! The blog was absolutely fantastic! Lots of great information and inspiration, both of which we all need!b Keep ’em coming… you all do such a great job at such Concepts… can’t tell you how much I, for one appreciate all you do!

  41. Posted May 27, 2010 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  42. Posted May 27, 2010 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    This is my second visit to this blog. We are starting a new initiative in the same category as this blog. Your blog provided us with important information to work on. You have done a marvellous job.

  43. Posted May 28, 2010 at 2:27 am | Permalink

    There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you bring up where the most important thing will be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game.

  44. Posted May 28, 2010 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  45. Posted May 28, 2010 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    Thank you for another fantastic blog. Where else could I get this kind of info written in such an incite full way? I have a presentation that I am just now working on, and I have been looking for such information.

  46. Posted May 28, 2010 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    Have you had problems with spammers?  I also use Blog Engine and I have some good anti-spam practices; please Email me if you are interested in an exchange of practices.

  47. Posted May 28, 2010 at 9:00 pm | Permalink

    i know i’m a little off topic, but i just wanted to say i love the layout of your blog. i’m new to the blogegine platform, so any tips on getting my blog looking good would be appreciated.

  48. Posted May 29, 2010 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Check this site out if you want a job in community services http://www.jobcommunity.com.au – they totally kick ass. Oh, it’s Australian BTW.

  49. Posted May 29, 2010 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    Of course, what a great site and informative posts, I will add backlink – bookmark this site? Regards, Reader.

  50. Posted May 30, 2010 at 8:40 am | Permalink

    I downloaded Fallout 3 torrent from http://www.games-iso.com about a week ago and, despite the fact its an old game, its the best PS2 game ever made in my opinion ;-)